User talk:Wikipaediasucks

Welcome!
Hello, Wikipaediasucks, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 22:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

March 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Malaysia Airlines Flight 370. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Dwpaul  Talk   22:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

My edit is actually a logical inclusion of other causes which impact aircraft while in flight. Your reversions are unproductive, harassing, and contribute to a hostile Wikipedia user experience.

And this is my ONLY Wikipedia account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipaediasucks (talk • contribs) 22:27, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * You better calm down son, calling a Wikipedian unproductive, harassing is also a personal attack. TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * @AirplaneGuy- I am NOT your son. My father is, in fact dead, so I am NOBODY's "son."  I find this comment to be patronizing, offensive, and an attempt to bully me.  Further, your comment is a THREAT ("You better..), and contributes to a hostile Wikipedia user experience.  AND further, FURTHER, My comments were descriptive and not personal in any way.  A personal attack would be something like:  "You ARE (an) unproductive and harrassing person."  Since I did not say that, I my comment cannot be construed as a "personal attack." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipaediasucks (talk • contribs) 22:54, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * A warning that an editor's behavior violates Wikipedia policy, and an accurate observation that continuing the behavior will generally result in a block, is not a threat but, rather, good advice. You might consider it in that light.  Dwpaul   Talk   23:07, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I can only interpret what I see on the page. For example, as a Master's Degree trained Social Worker, we in practice, find that DESCRIBING behavior is more likely to produce behavior change, in contrast with telling people how to act (PRESCRIPTION).


 * Your edit is a violation of Wikipedia policies against presenting speculation (even identified as such) without sources. If a credible expert says the same thing, and is quoted in a citable source, then this information can be included (with a citation).  The encyclopedia does not speculate in its own voice (hence you as an editor may not do so).  Dwpaul   Talk   22:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * I frequently find many uncited (unreferenced) passages in Wiki articles. In the past, under my "publicly visible" URL, I have, in accordance with Wikipedia policy (re: uncited passages) rempved those uncited passages, only to have my edits reverted.  This is extremely frustrating and reduces the quality of the wiki in general.  It's also the reason I chose this user name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipaediasucks (talk • contribs) 22:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The fact that there are other uncited passages in Wikipedia articles is not a justification for adding more.  Dwpaul   Talk   22:51, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Actually, it is. See article: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_route" with the comment:  "This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed."


 * You have since be reported and may face a possible block TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 22:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

I have reported both you and user Dwpaul as well. I previously cancelled an account due to similar behavior by various "editors." Complex editing formatting rules and hostile members, not to mention ongoing quality issues (spelling, grammar, composition, etc) will ultimately relegate Wikipedia to irrelevance. And that would be a shame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipaediasucks (talk • contribs) 23:16, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * In retrospect, we are just trying to help you. Both of us are highly experienced editors so there really isn't a point in reporting us, just a waste of time. TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 23:22, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * With regard to this, a) your request was improperly submitted, b) you apparently missed the information (here) that "formal mediation is only suitable for disputes over article content, so requests to mediate grievances with other editors will not be accepted", and c) beware the boomerang.


 * And would you PLEASE learn to sign your comments. I'm really getting quite tired of doing it for you.  Dwpaul  Talk   23:24, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification
Hi Wikipaediasucks, a couple things:
 * 1) Please select a different username as the one that you have is disruptive, a request for a username change can be made at Changing username. Wikipedia's username policy is at Username policy.
 * 2) Please do not add your own unsourced speculation about the aircraft accident/incident/missing

please don't use patronizing language with other users, such as referring to them as "son", it is unhelpful, and will generally make the person you are talking to inclined to act in the opposite manner that you are hoping they will. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Sure TheAirplaneGuy (talk) 23:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the name selection. I had intended to explain my choice on my user page, but got caught up in a dispute with a couple of Wikipedia members.


 * I looked into changing my user name, but can't figure out how to do so (see my previous comments re: diffic7ulty editing/formatting Wikipedia articles).  Perhaps Wikipedia could consider a more user friendly interface. For example, most word processing programs like Microsoft Word, Open Office, etc are more intuitive.
 * If you put your requested username here I will submit the request for you. If you would like a more user friendly interface visual editor is available.  Some people think it is easier to use, some people think it is more difficult.  I tend to think it is easier for some things.  To activate it, click on the word "beta" at the top of this (or any) Wikipedia page. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:45, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note the simple change page is actually located at Changing username/Simple, my mistake, I should have looked closer at the page I linked. I will still submit the request for you if you wish. --kelapstick(bainuu) 23:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, nor is trolling or other disruptive behavior ever tolerated. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text on your user talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Man, I go take a shit, & I get blocked. Way to go, Wikipedia!