User talk:WikipedStander

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wiki wiki dollar, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wiki wiki dollar was changed by WikipedStander (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961361 on 2012-02-17T22:21:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:21, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Dude!
W-what did you do that for? I mean, writing, "I like to have conversations with my sockpuppet on talk pages," is probably clear vandalism. I mean, I'm just waiting for you to start taking Wikipedia a bit more seriously.

ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 22:26, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

I am fairly new to Wikipedia, just joined a couple hours ago or something. I don't know if now I am well fit to understand that Wikipedia is not a blog or whatever. This is possibly the last point I'll make an inappropriate edit, and if you're waiting for me to take Wikipedia a bit more seriously, you're not doing a very good job, no offense (literally!) :D.

Can you please sign your posts! Daan.

ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 23:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

No. It is not clear vandalism. I read your Assume good faith thing. Think about what you're doing. You're refusing to assume good faith in a seven hour old user who by comparison has barely read a square inch of your guidelines. And you are being to assumingly pushy reminding me to sign my posts.

WikipedStander (talk) 02:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

See, that's what you did right there!

ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 03:01, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

All right. Well, anyway, it says do nota overthrust and assume good faith when something is obviously clear vandalism. Writing, "I like to have conversations with my sockpuppet on talk pages" is obviously clear vandalism. God, I don't wanna sound like a dirty jerk or anything but you are being disruptive, annoying, and ruining the quiet peace and harmony that is our encyclopædia. (Wow, sorry but I do sound like the dirty bad guy now*).

ObiwanLostToBarney (talk) 03:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Exactly.

WikipedStander (talk) 03:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:Jimbo Wales with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 03:30, 18 February 2012 (UTC)