User talk:Wikiphin2

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiphin2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Evolphin Zoom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ialsoagree (talk) 05:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Evolphin Zoom
A tag has been placed on Evolphin Zoom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ialsoagree (talk) 05:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Adobe Version Cue. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ialsoagree (talk) 05:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Removed a link on Adobe Version Cue
Hi, I removed a link you posted on Adobe Version Cue. I've read through your edit comment, but wanted to inform you that "Links to web pages that primarily exist to sell products or services" fall under the "Links to be avoided" category of Wikipedia's external linking policy. I've posted this message here to make sure you were aware of why this link does not appear to be appropriate for Wikipedia, and avoid an edit war. If you're affiliated with Evolphin Software, you should read Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest before making further edits that include or reference Evolphin Software, or anything in which you may be related or involved in. ialsoagree (talk) 21:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Removed a link on Adobe Version Cue
Hello - I have no wish to start an edit war. I have read through the Wiki guidelines and I can appreciate what your general push is about. Yes certainly we do not wish to have pages with adverts screaming.

That said I think you are doing a bit of disservice to the Adobe Version Cue community who are struggling right now due to the lack of viable alternatives. There are 2-3 products I have seen in the market place that address the issues with version Cue as well as serve as valid alternatives. More may come about.

Perhaps we could have a separate section below that discusses the pros and cons of Version Cue CS3/CS4 as well as outline of what the creative professionals are doing to mitigate the discontinuation of Cue in CS5. In that section viable alternatives could be discussed with valid technical explanation as opposed to blanket links like I had put ?

The page would then become more comprehensive I feel if we took that path, what do you think ?
 * Personally, I question whether this is the right aricle for such a discution as I suspect that if this software and similar software share the same role, there may be a more general article for the category of software that might be a more appropriate place for this discussion, but I could be wrong. In any event, I'd encourage you to get feedback from the rest of wikipedia as they might have better advice than I. You can request feedback here. If you have other questions, feel free to ask me or put   on your talk page and type your question after. ialsoagree (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)