User talk:Wikipita

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising, and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox", is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. --GreenJoe 19:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. --GreenJoe 19:37, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. GreenJoe 14:03, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles. Advertising, and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox", is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. --GreenJoe 14:04, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Simon Fraser Student Society
I wanted to extend an olive branch, and invite you to discuss the additions of material to the article, on the article's talk page. I'd love to help you with the issue so you can better conform to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. :-) GreenJoe 15:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi Greenjoe, while I agree with your assertion that Wikipedia is not a directory nor myspace, I take issue with you removing these names wihout replacing it with appropriate information. I think a list of the positions and what they do, is worthwhile, considering that the SFSS is a mix of exec and non exec positions. Can we give a better presentation of structure that is not necessarily in list format?


 * You're wordsmithing. A directory is any list of names. Doesn't have to have contact info. Student executives don't merit inclusion in the article unless they're already notable outside of their union activities. See WP:EiC. A list of positions they can get from the website. That's not notable. --GreenJoe 15:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! GreenJoe 15:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)