User talk:Wikireader41/Archive3

== Wikipedia Signpost : 11 May 2009 ==


 * News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
 * Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Dealing with Admins and Nangparbat
Hey, I have noticed that that jerk has been targeting you. When dealing with admins in relation to his actions, remember to show them this Sockpuppet_investigations/Nangparbat/Archive. Only a handful of admins know the protocol for stopping Nangparbat.

Thegreyanomaly (talk) 07:46, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * i know. but I think he is getting better known now. Thanx for your efforts anyway17:29, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

banned Freind of Nangparbat
- Easy to spot, eg likes creating cats and lots of articles, check User:AlexNewArtBot/PakistanSearchResult a lot of his new accounts show up there. Same POV  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 01:54, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Nangparbat
Ignore this user's edits to user talk pages. I'll deal with those myself. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 17:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * OK Wikireader41 (talk) 01:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Reply
The report actually comes to generally positive conclusions about Pakistanis and Indians. And the report also states its own unreliability due to the small numbers used. I am not the only one to reach the conclusion that the sentiments you expressed in the article were incorrect and unsupported. Alan 16 talk  22:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * and what makes you think that I did not mean it to be a positive reflection on British Pakistanis??? This is a reliable source and  the fact that the report was published and is still available on the website means their is enough merit in it if you look at it from NPOV Wikireader41 (talk) 22:59, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The report states that there has been a decline in the number of teenage pregnancies for Pakistanis, quote:

"Pakistani women – much higher than the white average twenty years ago – showed a consistent fall over the period, and were very similar to whites in recent years."
 * And I believe you do not intend to be positive because you failed to mention in your statement on the British Pakistanis article that Pakistanis are praised for having almost all child births in marriage whereas for whites it is almost half. Alan 16  talk  23:13, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * feel free to mention both those points. i do not see any issues with it. the fact still remains that they had the among the highest teenage birth rate and even though it has been falling recently.  Looks like some degree of assimilation is taking place.  i am sure lot of people would take issue with a statement that praised child births within a a marriage especially if you are implying heterosexual marriage. Wikireader41 (talk) 00:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, so you think having a child when a single parent is better? And read the quote, The pregnancy rating is basically identical to white people. So the comment is wrong. Alan 16  talk  00:39, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I prsonally dont. but many people think it does not impact children in any negative way. perhaps thats why this practice is relatively common in the west. have you looked at Table 2.  also do not turn a blind eye to 'Key Points'

-A method of estimating age-specific fertility rates from cross-sectional surveys of households has proved reliable.

-About 30 white teenagers have a baby, out of every 1,000 at risk.

- Teenage motherhood is more common among Caribbean, Pakistani and, especially, Bangladeshi women than among white women.- But young Indian women are less likely than whites to have a baby before they are 20.- Many white and most Caribbean teenage mothers are unmarried; but the majority of births to teenagers of South Asian origin are within marriage.

-The rates of teenage births among white and Caribbean women are stable, but there has been a marked decline in early parenthood in South Asian communities in Britain.

have a good day. 00:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Reply (II)
The IP address is not blocked, so I worked under the assumption that they could edit under the Wikipedia policy Anybody can edit. I have never came into contact with Nangparbat, and know nothing about him. I have broken no rules, and will continue to edit without breaking rules. Keep your attacks and POV to yourself. All my edits to these controversial topics are sourced. Alan 16 talk  23:30, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * see my response on your talk page alan. best wishes Wikireader41 (talk) 01:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Making sockpuppet accusations on talk pages isn't right:. Open an investigation instead, please. Fences and windows (talk) 23:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 18 May 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Writers needed
 * Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
 * Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
 * News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 13:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Nangparbat
There's no point in leaving warnings on his user talk pages (he's just going to edit war over them using other IPs). Just report him on my talk and I'll deal with the user. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 23:27, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * OKWikireader41 (talk) 23:29, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 25 May 2009 ==


 * License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
 * News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:24, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 1 June 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Browsing the archives
 * Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
 * Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
 * News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 23:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Nangparbat

 * Dealt with. CAn't believe there's so much hagiography Featured article review/Pakistan. REads like a govt advert.  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) 04:58, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
 * ThanxWikireader41 (talk) 21:53, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Yousaf465-llike editor
 YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 07:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Apparently he was not a sock :( Another troublemaker to deal with  YellowMonkey  ( cricket calendar poll! ) paid editing=POV 06:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Kindly refrain from labeling me as a trouble maker... I maintain a very NPOV and WP:RS .... and keep in mind wp:civil policy before calling someone names such as rubbish, trouble-maker and calling my edits as problem.... Adil your (talk) 10:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 15 June 2009 ==


 * Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
 * News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
 * Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:34, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Good job(s). South Asian Terrorism Portal and Ajai Sahni :)
Thank you for your work, very much. I have very much enjoyed working with you, and hope we do so again, and that we get to agree more than we disagree, and find common ground where we can't. All the best.- sinneed (talk) 19:43, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost : 22 June 2009 ==


 * Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
 * News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

fyi
User:MoRsE, if I understand him correctly, is asserting that you agree with his move. User_talk:MoRsE As you can see from my questions to him, I do not agree with his move.

He said he believes his behavior is consistent with the wikipedia's policies. I am troubled by this. I do not regard his behavior as compliant with the obligations on all of us to behave accountably, and to try to give civil meaningful answers to civil questions.

Has your interest in the name of the article survived?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 16:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I am troubled too. I do not know if you realize that I am the original author who started this article.  A major part of the article has been contributed by me.  So yes my interest in the article is very much alive no matter what the title is.  I think we should continue the debate and revert the name back as soon as we have consensus ;-). Cheers. Wikireader41 (talk) 22:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)


 * No, I didn't know that.


 * How would you feel about a name halfway between? Instead of:
 * Drone attacks on Pakistan by the United States
 * Drone attacks in Pakistan by the United States
 * Something like:
 * Unauthorized Drone attacks on Pakistani targets by the United States
 * Unauthorized Drone attacks on Pakistani territory by the United States
 * Unauthorized Drone attacks on targets within Pakistan by the United States
 * Unauthorized American drone attacks on targets within Pakistan
 * Unauthorized American drone attacks on targets on Pakistani territory
 * Unauthorized American drone attacks on targets in Pakistani territory
 * Unauthorized American drone attacks on Pakistani targets


 * Of all these I prefer your original choice. If you agree to this, do you think we should yield on the "Unauthorized" part?


 * I started an article originally entitled Allegations that Tablighi Jamaat has ties to terrorism.
 * A different uninvolved administrator strolled by and unilaterally moved it to the current name: Tablighi Jamaat and allegations of terrorism. They claimed: "more appropriate name".  Someone else came along and tried to rename it to Tablighi Jamaat and allegations of terrorism by U.S intelligence.  Both the passing administrator's name, and the other guy's suggested name suffer from being ambiguous.  They are open to the interpretation that TJ is the target of alleged terrorist acts, not the alleged actor.


 * A former administrator, and vile vandal and sockpuppet, User:KI moved Charities_accused_of_ties_to_terrorism to Charities with ties to terrorism. He is the only person to file an rfc on me.


 * At WP:Requested moves there are tools for polls. Have you ever initiated one?  We could initiate a poll on the original name, but I think one of the compromise names is more likely to succeed.  Proponent of the most recent name say our preferred choice is POV.  And we think theirs is POV.  So I think our poll should rule out both names.


 * Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 01:34, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
 * I think those are reasonable. but we need to discuss this on article talk pageWikireader41 (talk) 14:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

KPS Gill
It's like trying to arm-wrestle octopi. :) I have people on both sides "He is great! Yay!" and "He is a fiend!  Boo!".  Thanks for the support.  Much appreciated. :) - sinneed (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * It actually isn't the POV pushers that bother me. It is the other editors (and most especially admins) that assume that if you oppose a POV push that you have a POV.  I have written a very early (less than 1st) draft of what I hope will be an essay on that problem. ;)- sinneed (talk) 00:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Neat about Gill. Ah, neutrality...we are humans, we can only strive for neutrality... if nothing else our societies, languages and training filter our view of the world.  Best of luck to you.  If this is a holiday weekend for you, have a happy one... and if not have a great weekend anyway! :)- sinneed (talk) 00:40, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 6 July 2009 ==


 * News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Kashmir conflict Timeline
I feel then this should be restricted to few things like wars, CBM's, Indo-Pak, Indo-Kashmir and Pak-Kashmir meetings etc only. The rest of day to day affairs should be cited in the main page. What do you say? Kashmirspeaks {talk} —Preceding undated comment added 19:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC).

I was editing that...
I wanted the links out of the template. Sorry you got to it before I did.- sinneed (talk) 04:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
Sent you a very important link I think you should eat them also. A kind of wikilove. '''yousaf465'  09:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * sorry I dont like eating pineapples though I dont mind pina coladas once in a while. I read the links to dawn. Thank you very much Kindly.  I think Dawn has been taken over by RAW agents.  You know Mohajirs anyway always were more Indians than Pakistani. ;-)Wikireader41 (talk) 13:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well than make a cup of pine colda without the rum, it will you. Also Pakistanis were perviously Indian whether Majors nor no majors. '''yousaf465'

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 27 July 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
 * Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
 * Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
 * Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
 * News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
 * Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe Delivered by -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> Tinu  <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000">Cherian BOT  - 14:52, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

POV
Good idea. Alan16 (talk) 23:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
'''yousaf465'  05:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

BLA
I didn't put the Cristine fair comment, it was already there, I merely shifted it. I only added two lines regarding "Support" with 7 refs to back it up, so POV pushers like you can't remove it... Stop posting these silly warnings, You clearly don't have a case... And I am not accusing YellowMonkey, I am Exposing him, and for your information, I already have reported him... You don't need to worry about that... And please stop Pushing POV... Adil your (talk) 12:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 3 August 2009 ==


 * News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Morefire34 reverting you
Hi, just noticed new Morefire34 is reverting your edits, eg Avicenna and also deleted a warning at another user's talk page: User talk:Adil your.  Esowteric + Talk  13:37, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

MD
Which university ? -- '''yousaf465'  07:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Panjab University, ChandigarhWikireader41 (talk) 01:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Which college. '''yousaf465'  04:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 10 August 2009 ==


 * Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
 * News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 06:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 17 August 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
 * Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
 * News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:58, 18 August 2009 (UTC)