User talk:Wikisergiospain

Leader of the Opposition (Spain)
This is issue is sourced and explained enough throughout the article, and any substantial change such as the one you made should be discussed. Cheers. Impru20 (talk) 16:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Firstly, Iglesias position is disputed, and it's listed as such. He is not the official officeholder, but nowhere is he listed as that. Removing him altogether just deprives readers of that information.
 * Secondly, the PP do partially recognizes Iglesias as Opposition Leader. Even some PSOE deputies recognized him as such in Rajoy's investiture debate, as well as the media (Sources:, , ). He is obviously disputed, but for he being disputed he must be a claimant to the title. And that's why he is listed, because he is a partially-recognized claimant, and you've sources pointing out so.
 * Thirdly, I don't know why did you remove other info from the article altogether. You maybe should be more careful with your edits.
 * On the Podemos/Unidos Podemos issue, only "Podemos" is listed because it is the party for which Iglesias is a member. Unidos Podemos is not formally a party, but just a joint electoral platform between Podemos, IU and other parties which, however, do not have a joint membership. Thus, in my opinion Unidos Podemos is better left just for election articles, at least until (and if) it turns into a fully-fledged political party itself, though this is quite open to discussion, actually. Impru20 (talk) 16:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Stop your random removal of content. Your edits actually have no sense, since you're just removing Iglesias from the table... to add him yourself in a different way. And you keep removing other info from the article which have nothing to do with Iglesias. STOP this disruptive behaviour. Impru20 (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
 * On this comment of yours: "I think that the tittle is: "List of Opposition Leaders" not Possible Leaders of Opposition or candidates to be the Leader". No, he is not there because of him being "possible" or "candidate", but because there are sources which recognize him as Opposition Leader, at least in some point or in some degree. He may be disputed, but it's not just a case of him regarding himself as such: there are media recognizing him as such at some point. Besides, it's just absurd that you say that and then you add him back to the table in other format. Impru20 (talk) 17:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Leader of the Opposition (Spain). If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.