User talk:Wikisyzygy

hey!
how's it going?

Reinamg (talk) 16:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Peer Review by Barrie
Hi Deepa, I think you have a solid start, you have really put in A LOT of work! There seems to be a typo (omission) in the Assumptions section. When adding to that, you may also want to add a key factors section. I see you have done some grammar editing and restructuring as well. I think that your re-titling as well as bibliographical additions are a huge improvement to the page. On a strictly content note, you may want to add Kats et al. (1974 to your New Media review. You also did an amazing review of this on the blog this week so I know you have a solid content foundation. THis is an except from YOUR WORK that I would just plop into the Assumptions section here:

Given these differing theories, UGT is unique in its assumptions (West and Turner, 397):


 * The audience is active and its media use is goal oriented
 * The initiative in linking need gratification to a specific medium choice rests with the audience member
 * The media compete with other resources for need satisfaction
 * People have enough self-awareness of their media use, interests, and motives to be able to provide researchers with an accurate picture of that use.
 * Value judgements of media content can only be assessed by the audience.

Great work.

BarrieMichelle (talk) 15:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)BarrieBarrieMichelle (talk) 15:53, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Tweets
Bazonka (talk) 20:04, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi Deepa! Happy ambassador training day. What's a syzygy? Readersara (talk) 19:04, 10 January 2013 (UTC)