User talk:Wikiupd

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Terry George with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terry_George&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Chip123456 (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

RE: Terry George
Please do not remove material because it is "contentious" -- only if it is demonstrably untrue. Edit warring will lead to WP:1RR or page protection at WP:ANI. Quis separabit? 15:49, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Warning:
 * There is nothing libelous in the Terry George page; if you think so then let his lawyer contact Wikimedia. This material comes from the same source that provided additional text which you were content to leave but which makes no sense without the rest. If you continue edit warring I am going to have to report this to ANI for resolution. Quis separabit?  16:52, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello!

May I ask in what way do you think that the article Terry George is libelous?--5 albert square (talk) 23:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. I have reviewed the article and cannot see how it is libelous. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 5 albert square (talk) 00:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC) o grinf

All detail regarding Northern Ireland in the period discussed is both subjective and contentious. According to the profile of rms125a the person is blocked from editing related to the Troubles - either your rules apply or dont. The person obviously has an axe to grind which I do not believe is the purpose of Wikipedia