User talk:Wikiuser100/archive 5 (2012)

Archive 2012 Talk here.

Adobo
Any reasons why you removed several perfectly good references? -- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  15:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your enquiry. The references at issue were wholly redundant as applied (to the passage in the Lede); when I made my edit I did not realize they were employed elsewhere in the article: I should have looked closer.  Happily, AnomieBOT [(talk | contribs)‎ (7,057 bytes) (Rescuing orphaned refs ("oxford" from rev 476063039; "rodell" from rev 476063039))] rescued and reintroduced them later in the article where they were relevant.  Yours. Wikiuser100 (talk) 02:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, cheers. :) -- O BSIDIAN  †  S OUL  06:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Virago
Thanks for improvements to the lead of the Virago article. One of the good things about a DYK appearance is that the article gets lots of "fresh eyes".  Tigerboy1966  12:40, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. My pleasure.  You're doing a yeoman's job with champion British horses, by the gross.  Good.  Cheers.  Wikiuser100 (talk) 21:36, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Derrick
Thank you for patiently listening to what I had to say, and for your cool headed, highly intuitive, response. . :) Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 00:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. Good luck on your next, and your studies. Cheers. Wikiuser100 (talk) 11:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Great works
Hi Wikiuser100, please feel free to make Great Works, currently a redirect to Megala Erga, into a disambiguation page. (If that's the right thing to do ... I never know when to dab and when to just hat.) — [dave] cardiff &#124; chestnut — 15:38, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads-up, Dave. I think a hat is OK for now, since there are only two pages sharing "Great Works" and one can only end up at the River's page by adding that descriptor to their search.
 * There are two Great Works Dams, one on the Great Works River, a much larger (and more newsworthy one) on the Penobscott in Down East (Maine). The latter is/was scheduled for removal in 2012 (to accommodate fish migration).  Its license to operate was set to expire March 31, 2012.  I'm not sure where the project stands.
 * Last, there is a Great Works Land Trust and a Great Works River Watershed Coalition, both dedicated to the subject of the current Wikipedia page. If any of these other entities come to meet Wikipedia notability guidelines and earn pages then a dab would be warranted. Cheers.Wikiuser100 (talk) 18:55, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Gotcha. Thanks for the info, and for tweaking the first sentence of Megala Erga. — [dave] cardiff &#124; chestnut —  19:18, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * My pleasure, both.Wikiuser100 (talk) 19:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Seau
Thanks for your copyedits to Junior Seau. The infobox lists him as being born in San Diego, though it is not in the body. A source can probably be cited and added to the text. Also, readers who are not familiar with the NFL or linebackers might appreciate restoring American football to the lead sentence. Keep up the good work!—Bagumba (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. I never thought to look in the Infobox for place of birth. It would be helpful to be added to the Early Years section, as obviously I was confused as the copy bounced from Pago-Pago to an unspecified "Camp Pendleton" (before I added a general geographic reference for those who otherwise would not have a clue where it was) to American Samoa and back to the U.S.
 * Readers who are not familiar with the NFL can figure out in a single click what sport it is, but that rationale is weak (as it would apply to an unspecified Camp Pendleton as well). I'll see if I can work "American Football" in neatly in the lede. Appreciate your acknowledgment. Cheers. Wikiuser100 (talk) 15:45, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Typically, we would list the subject's nationality and profession in the lead sentence of a bio, like "American basketball player", but American American football player doesnt seem right. Based on a quick sampling of articles, it doesnt seem that WikiProject National Football League has a standard either, other than to assume most NFL players are usually American.—Bagumba (talk) 15:54, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Both requested edits done.
 * I prefer the convention of birth date and place/death date and place in parentheses in the 1st sentence, but it seems as though that has lost favor here. Or am I not looking in the right places? Cheers. Wikiuser100 (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * See WP:OPENPARAGRAPH. Birth/death place typically not mentioned in lead, but this might be the exception as "they are relevant to the person's notability."  Not sure if they belong in the first sentence though, even if they are placed in the lead.—Bagumba (talk) 16:10, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

I'm fine with it the way it is. As a preference, though, I like those four items of info there so I don't have to hunt around for them. Not every bio has an Infobox displaying them. I'll have to make it a habit to look there first for those that do. Cheers. Wikiuser100 (talk) 16:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything in an infobox should ideally be in the body and cited, but the infobox usually has more info in the case of less mature articles.—Bagumba (talk) 18:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Allard
Hi Wikiuser100. I've noticed your amendments to Allard and I don't really know enough to comment except that the opening paragraph does not now, it seems to me, make sense. The events - as I understand them - you may know better, were that 25 yr-old Sydney Allard used a spare corner in the premises of his father's Putney Ford dealership to make some specials beginning about 1936 and by the start of the war in 1939 he had made about a dozen. After the war in 1945 he took over some war-surplus premises three miles away in Clapham that his father no longer needed, incorporated the company to own the business and made Allard cars. Yes it can be said that he started making cars in 1936 but the company didn't exist for nearly another decade. Best wishes Eddaido (talk) 12:14, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the additional background on this. Can you provide a cite for this information, and any other I might add to the patchwork in the lede to improve it?  Thanks.  Cheeers. Wikiuser100 (talk) 10:31, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm just trying to explain why the lead was the way it was before you altered it and muddled things up. Do you follow my logic? You can easily verify what I say through Google. But in any case which bit of the above do you regard as new to you? Regards, Eddaido (talk) 11:57, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you, but it's not my job to "verify things through Google". That is the responsibility of whomever adds content to a Wikipedia article.  As I indicated, I will make an effort to sort out the Allard article's lede.  It would be helpful if you provided the sourced content to support your contentions. Yours, Wikiuser100 (talk) 01:52, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Hold on, you've added content in the lead (by re-writing it as you believe it should be) and your result is misleading and confusing. I'm just trying to help you understand (by giving you a fuller version of the events you tried to summarise) what has gone wrong with your edit. Do you see the problem? If you see the problem it will be a moment's work for you to rephrase your edit. If you can't see the problem just say so and I will try harder to explain. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 03:26, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Needing Wiki contribution assistance!
Hello Wikiuser100,

I am looking for an experienced Wikipedian to contribute an article for our band Mr. Meeble. I have checked and we meet the Wikipedia "notability" guidelines for a band. We have a very basic Wikipedia article written already, but I know that someone like yourself may be able to point out our formatting errors and critical omissions. You can hear our music and see our videos here:

http://youtube.com/mrmeeble http://soundcloud.com/meeble

Let me know if you would be willing to help!

Regards, Devin mm @ meeble.com

Devbot (talk) 04:14, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your invitation but I am not actively editing Wikipedia at this time. Yours. Wikiuser100 (talk) 12:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Avery Brundage FA
On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for editorial efforts that helped Avery Brundage become a WP:FA.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the acknowledgement. The article was in much rougher shaped back at that ime.  Good to see it has come along since. Wikiuser100 (talk) 10:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Metolius Climbing


A tag has been placed on Metolius Climbing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. noq (talk) 19:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Wikiuser100. I wanted to explain to you why I deleted this, since you had a left a detailed note on the talk page. First and foremost, the article did not explain what makes the company significant - it just sounds like a small, specialist company of which there are millions. As you left a note I did have a search for possible references which could be added to the article and explain its significance, but couldn't find anything beyond very brief mentions. Considering this, speedy deletion was justified. If you want to recreate the article, can I suggest you track down some good sources first? Cheers SmartSE (talk) 20:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
SmartSE (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Pike pole
thank you for your interest in cleaning up articles. I know, It is a tedious work not many wikipedians like much. However when you are dealing with unfamiliar subjects you mast be extremely careutious with rephrasing, especially moving thihgs around. In praticular you got yourself quite confused with Cossacks. Therefore I had to revert you. Sorry I killed other your cleanup. If you are not willing to repeat the job, I will restore your cosmetic changes in the page a bit later, in spare time. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:24, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You explained what you did, not why. See Talk:Pike pole Yours.Wikiuser100 (talk) 10:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes I explained why: you are quite confused on the subject (Also later I noticed you start your own guesswork without comparing your hypotheses against article text, which was refernced, by the way. Reverting a referenced text is a no-no, unless you can prove that the references are misquoted or orther serious reasons.). A smart man humbly stands corrected and asks for explanations (if curious enough) rather than immediately dives into revert wars. Staszek Lem (talk) 00:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Skip the condescension, Lem. There is no substance to what you've written here. User Vmenkov has responded satisfactorily with cited content at the Pike pole Talk page, where I have twice besought interested parties to engaged this dialogue. Yours. Wikiuser100 (talk) 12:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Bobbyandbeans (talk) 17:23, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Bobbyandbeans (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Bobbyandbeans (talk) 21:30, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Talk page archives
Hello Wikiuser100. Looks like you accidentally put your archives in the article namepsace. I've fixed it, I hope. Happy holidays! --Noiratsi (talk) 15:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * No worries! I caught 2009, 2010 and 2011; they are now at User talk:Wikiuser100/archive 2 (2009), User talk:Wikiuser100/archive 3 (2010) and User talk:Wikiuser100/archive 4 (2011) respectively. One common way to do subpages is to put link starting with a "/" on your talk page or user page. Here's a link to /archive 5 (2012) (which will point to User talk:Wikiuser100/archive 5 (2012)) so you can easily do the next one ^^. Alternatively put "User:" or "User talk:" in the search box when you enter the name of the page you want to make. --Noiratsi (talk) 16:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Cheers! Got it. Thanks for your help. Wikiuser100 (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Season's tidings!
To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:11, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Back at you. Wikiuser100 (talk) 05:47, 23 December 2012 (UTC)