User talk:Wikiwarrior21

WP:COIDISCLOSEPAY
Created page for VantageFX, hired by Navin through Freelancer

Created page for Treeium Inc, hired by Edgar Lima

Created page for Christian Young, hired by a PR company

Created page for Ashwin Dhanraj Porwal, hired by Franklin Fernandes via a personal reference

Nomination of VantageFX for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VantageFX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/VantageFX until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 17:20, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about David J. Cherry
Hello, Wikiwarrior21,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether David J. Cherry should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/David J. Cherry.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 21:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Treeium Inc for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Treeium Inc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Treeium Inc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SeraphWiki (talk) 02:59, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Please stop
Please stop moving articles that have been submitted for review via AFC to main space until such a time you are accepted as a reviewer. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  20:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll add this a bit more firmly: it appears that you have been paid to edit Christian Young (Entrepreneur). You were correct to edit it in draft space. Our guideline on paid editing and conflict of interest high suggests this. While you technically can move your own creation to mainspace, the way you did it makes it look like it was someone else's work that that you approved and accepted unless you get down into the diffs. This type of conduct can appear deceptive and is strongly discouraged by our guidelines, and continuing to do so when combined with promotion or other issues with the articles you edit can lead to blocks or other sanctions. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:30, 16 January 2018 (UTC)