User talk:Wikiwind/Archive 1

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

CFC
Thanks for your attempt to keep the article sane and based on reliable sources. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 15:18, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Unsourced people in Ex-gay movement
I've gone ahead and sourced everything that you contested as unsourced. Feel free to drop me a note if you see errors or omissions. Providing encyclopedic coverage of such a controversial topic is indeed a delicate BLP balance, isn't it? Jclemens (talk) 00:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit war
I suggest you stop moving the edit war you are involved in to new language versions all the time. Discuss things on one language version (why not here on enwp?) and then move on to other language versions. GameOn (talk) 08:32, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Etiquette, policy, etc.
Hi, regarding some of your recent comments at the RfD, I gently suggest that you leave out (and even go back and strike) your thoughts regarding other editors' motivations. See WP:Etiquette - there are various procedures for handling difficult situations with other editors (e.g. WP:WQA, WP:DDE, WP:DR), but until that point it's best to stick to policy; don't give others the ability to bring action against you. Best, AV3000 (talk) 14:09, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I striked some of my comments per WP:AGF. Thanks for your advice. But, user who started AFD didnt even read instructions how to do that. Please read my comment on talk page of the AFD page.--'' В и к и в и н д  T a L k  14:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Good, thanks. Yup, I've requested assistance. AV3000 (talk) 14:36, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

...
sorry, I said talk page but meant discussion page

All the best

Boynamedsue (talk) 18:33, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

curiousity killed the cat
a strange question in deed. a simple answer: why should u see me on other language wikis, anyways? i don't know, since i don't see any point on wasting my time there. goodone (talk) 14:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * u will find that my answer is not so strange, if u realize that the main points u had for asking ur question in the 1st place r invalid by themselves. however, this is only valid if u do not think i should be wasting my time on at least seven different language wikis. if u do, well, then, i simply do not agree. i have a life after all. goodone (talk) 15:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * as for translation of the article, asaik, there is such an article on sr wiki already. well, it may not be complete, precise, or well structured and written as the one u r referring to, and it surely is outdated, but there is one. counted that somebody didn't delete it meanwhile, since the last time i checked was in 2008, and i somehow got the feeling it wasn't updated either. moreover, i don't want to waste time searching for it now; the entire cyrillic nonsense is too much for me. anyways, have fun translating. wikipedia surely could use more activity. goodone (talk) 15:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

National Socialism
As the article is a redirect from National Socialism and there is NO separate article thereon, it is clear that referring to National Socialism and making it extremely clear that the reference is not about Nazism must belong properly in some article, and this is "the only game in town". Please self-revert the Nazism revert you made, or show me what article it belongs in -- noting that there is NO "National Socialism" article. Cheers. Collect (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Zoosexuality
What about this as a sexual orientation? You want to support its inclusion at the Sexual orientation article? Homosexuals and zoosexuals, in the same boat. You can come in and comment on the talk page. 120.203.215.11 (talk) 01:17, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I am aware of the discussion, and the only reason why I didn′t commented is because I know  it will not happen . There are no reliable scientific sources that classify "zoosexuality" as a sexual orientation. It is a pathetic attempt of one user, and it will never pass. And message for you - be careful because this can be seen as canvassing. Regards!--  В и к и  T   08:54, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

eh srbine...:(
ne verujem...frapirao sam se kad sam video da si ti predlozio brisanje clanka potpisani...nije te mrzelo da trazis clanak po engleskoj vikipediji i od milion stranih korisnika i urednika ti budes bas taj koji ce predloziti brisanje clanka o srpskoj seriji na engleskom vikiju??? ...ej, srbine, srbine... najgori smo...sad razumem izreku ko ce kome ako ne svoj svome...i treba da izumremo i medjusobno se istebimo kad smo ovakvi...lepo je patrijarh Pavle rekao: budimo ljudi iako smo Srbi...ali dzaba :((((...apsolutno ne znam koji ti je motiv (korist, cilj ili bilo sta drugo) za ovo osim da komsiji (meni) crkne krava...uzasnut sam...--Astreriks (talk) 19:59, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * ne radi se uopte o tome da li ce na kraju clanak biti obrisan ili ne, vec tvoj motiv da uradis tako jednu, po meni, podmuklu stvar koja ce, bez obzira na ishod, ostaviti oziljak na mom srcu poput bratski zabijenog noza u ledja. izvini ako sam te necim povredio, ali zaista ne mogu da pronikenem u tvoju glavu i pronadjem opravdavajuci motiv za tvoj postupak. cak i da je clanak potpuno irelevantan kako kazes (a nije), cak i da su neki autori zloupotebljavali vikipediju sa lutkama ili cime vec (mada ne znam kakve to veze ima sa ovim engleskim vikijem), pa ne bi trebalo da se brukamo i pljujemo medjusobno pred strancima i da od svih mogucih administratora, urednika i koriisnika budes bas ti koji ce to uraditi. pa majku mu, nasi smo ako nista drugo...pljujmo se u svom dvoristu ali bar ne iznosimo taj prljavi ves napolje...ja to ne mogu da shvatim zaista...umesto da ti je drago, koliko god smatras clanak irelevantnim, da je neki srpski clanak prosao na stranom jeziku, tebi je jedini motiv da oblatis i srozas komsiju...jos jednom izvini, na mozda nekim grubo izrecenim recima u afektu, ali zaista ne znam kako drugacije da protumacim tvoje postupke...kao sto rekoh, zgranut sam.--Astreriks (talk) 06:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

For your consideration
Don't revert due solely to "no consensus" regarding. Respectfully. Crazynast 13:29, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * But you need a consensus to change four years old policy. That's how things works here. For your information, I supported the change during the RFC, but this is wrong way to go. Regards!-- В и к и  T   13:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * (Procedural note: I got you on my list, so can we keep the discussion here for my sanity?)
 * Oh really? WP:BOLD, WP:BRD, do not apply to policies now?  Crazynast 13:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * WP:BRD is an essay, and you should read that ...but please be careful part of WP:BOLD.-- В и к и  T   14:14, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Heads up
Letting you know about this, in case you want to weigh in. Flyer22 (talk) 22:11, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Please see
As you participated in discusion before, please see here the last proposition. Thanks! -- WhiteWriter speaks 22:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Santorum vs santorum
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Santorum vs santorum". Thank you. --The Gnome (talk) 07:55, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Freedom to Marry, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anne Hathaway, Jack Reed and Bob Casey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit-warring report on NYyankies51
As one of the editors involved, you may want to comment: [] Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 05:57, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks.  An  optimist on the  run!  16:34, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks.-- В и к и  T   16:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Hej Brate!

 * Kako baš mene nađe :) Ima još mnogo korisnika sa prostora Bivše Juge. Možda ih lakše možeš pronaći preko wikiprojekata (npr: WikiProject_Serbia) ili preko kategorija (Category:User sr. Nisam ni ja nešto aktivan na engleskoj vikipediji. Pozdrav!-- В и к и  T   19:10, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Welcome
{| style="border: 2px solid #CC3333; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: lightsteelblue; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles and content that have been nominated for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable, and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles and content to quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

AfD request
Please explain why you think an AfD is appropriate? The article was previously redirected by consensus, therefore the article should remain redirected until consensus changes. Fasttimes68 (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't know all relevant facts but if I'm not mistaken, article is deleted 8 months ago. In the meantime she got news coverage as a result of lawsuit against the NYPD, so it's not the same article that was deleted 8 months ago. You should really start new deletion request if you think she's not notable. -- В и к и  T   21:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

PS. If you continue to abuse your rollback privileges, I will ask their removal. See WP:ROLLBACK.-- В и к и  T   21:32, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * One use isn't abuse. This article is essentially the same as the earlier version.  If there is a disagreement about this, it should be discussed first..  This is really just a procedural issue, and I don't think AfD is the place for it at the moment -- the talk page of the article should sufficent to respect the previous consensus.  Of course I'm open to being convinced otherwise.  Regards. Fasttimes68 (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The correct place to debate this is DRV and that what what you should do, take the draft to DRV and see if community consensus supports restoration. Spartaz Humbug! 18:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 04:50, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Account activation codes have been emailed.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * The 1-year, free period begins once you enter the code.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Think of it this way
With a significant number of Opposes, a ban right now would be controversial and noisy. With that closure in place, it is very unlikely that POV editing will get by the onlookers, and any ban will be much easier to enforce and defend because it comes after an unambiguous warning of consequences.

The alternative is a "no consensus" close and punt it to ArbCom, which would leave you arguing for another month or two.

Watch, wait, and let Anupam dig their own grave if that's how it must be. Guy (Help!) 11:51, 9 May 2012 (UTC)


 * I can agree that there was no consensus for site ban (although, there was growing support), but there was consensus for topic ban. More than 75% of users supported TB, and if you discount comments of those involved (including mine), that percentage is even higher. I don't think that you will be attacked by all sides, because Anupam is more than satisfied with this outcome. -- В и к и  T   14:30, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It's not a vote. I looked at the opinions, there were credible objections from people whose view I had no reason to discount. This way any ban resulting from continuation should have approaching 100% support. Guy (Help!) 15:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Serbia!
Hi, and welcome to the WikiProject Serbia!

Добродошли!

We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to Serbia. A few features of the project that you might find helpful:


 * All important discussions take place on our project's main discussion page; you can also [ watch] this page to keep up with discussions.
 * You might also be interested in placing our userbox User WikiProject Serbia on your user page.
 * The project has some departments, which handle article quality assessment and new page patrolling. These pages have slowed recently and are looking for extra eyes!
 * If you spot an article within the scope of our project please add our tag   to its talk page.
 * Cleanup some of the articles listed for cleanup.


 * We also have a two sister WikiProjects, one on our capital, Belgrade at WP:BGD, and other on our cultural heritage, at WP:CHS. Consider joining them too!
 * Add some of your accomplishments and best articles into our Serbian showcase list.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask me or any other member of the project, we'll be happy to help you.

Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Happy editing! WhiteWriterspeaks 23:22, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Tomislav Nikolić". Thank you. -- ◅PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 16:53, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Questions about Wikipedia & SuggestBot
Hi, we’ve been running a research experiment with SuggestBot and would like to ask you some questions about Wikipedia and SuggestBot. You can find more information and the questions on this page. It should take less than ten minutes to respond. We would greatly appreciate if you had the time to participate! Regards, Nettrom (talk) 19:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, just stopping by with a one-time reminder that we would really like to hear from you! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 20:42, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Regnerus study
Given your earlier interest, perhaps you'd care to comment at Talk:LGBT parenting Thanks. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 16:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Your Credo Reference account is approved
Good news! You are approved for access to 350 high quality reference resources through Credo Reference. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 17:24, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Fill out the survey with your username and an email address where your sign-up information can be sent.
 * If you need assistance, ask User:Ocaasi.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Credo article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Credo pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Credo accounts/Citations.
 * Credo would love to hear feedback at WP:Credo accounts/Experiences
 * Show off your Credo access by placing on your userpage
 * If you decide you no longer can or want to make use of your account, donate it back by adding your name here

Category:Gay Wikipedians
Hello fellow Wikipedian!

Because you were a participating member of the Deletion review for Category:Gay Wikipedians, I've contacted you to let you (and all others involved) know about and participate in the current category discussion. Thanks for your participation!

Ncboy2010 (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Flags and Same-sex marriage legislation around the world
Could you give your opinion here? Ron 1987 (talk) 12:55, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Could you give your opinion about this edit here? Ron 1987 (talk) 20:12, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Credo account access has been sent to your email!
All editors who were approved for a Credo account and filled out the survey giving their username and email address were emailed Credo account access information. Please check your email. If you have any other questions, feel free to contact me. I hope you enjoy your account! User:Ocaasi 15:40, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you didn't receive an email, or didn't fill out the survey, please email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com
 * If you tried out Credo and no longer want access, email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email! If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia). Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
 * 2) Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code.  Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
 * 3) Create your account by entering the requested information.  (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
 * 4) You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID.  (The account is now active for 1 year).
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
 * Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
 * Show off your Questia access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

BSA membership controversies 'Positions on homosexuality' section Discussion
Just wanted to tell you that there is discussion happening on the changes you made to the discussion, although I wan't 100% sure which changes your comment was referring to. I also wanted to state that I personally find your casual threats of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and casual inappropriate use of Requests for comment to be immature. If you could actually discuss concerns on the talk page and act civil, it would make me happier and probably please other users on Wikipedia. ZybthRanger(talk) (contribs) 21:54, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Homosexuality
I have read the article. Please read the talkpage. I dispute the use of this in the lead as original research and undue weight. While thauthor does use the term its weight on this article is more than questionable. Would you be inclined to discuss on the talkpage?--Amadscientist (talk) 22:09, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, i will discuss on talk page, where I will also raise question of your removal of sourced content from "Etimology" section.-- В и к и  T   22:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Mail
Flyer22 (talk) 17:27, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase
Hello. As a participant in Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:34, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

YRC edits
By any chance, did you save a copy of the edits on YRC's user talk page before they got oversighted last night? Please drop me an email if you did. Prioryman (talk) 02:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

It would also be very helpful, since you saw the edits in question, if you could describe their nature on AN/I and why you reverted them. It's understandable that some people are frustrated that they can't see the evidence but I think it would help if those who did see them could explain what they saw. Prioryman (talk) 03:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at WP:ANI regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User North8000 disruptive talk page editing at talk:Homophobia. Thank you. - MrX 19:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Youreallycan case declined
Hi there. Just letting you know that the case you filed against Youreallycan has been declined. Best, NW ( Talk ) 22:50, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:35, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Holiday Cheer

 * Thanks :)-- В и к и  T  10:28, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Lionhead99 again at the Lesbian article
You might have missed it, but he reduced the lead in mostly the same way you reverted him before. I reverted him this time and left a message on his talk page about it.

And Happy Holidays. Flyer22 (talk) 16:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I missed that edit. I have 700 pages on my Watchlist, so it's hard to monitor everything. Thanks for the notice and Happy Holidays :)-- В и к и  T  18:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

FYI
Since you filed an 3RR report 12 hours ago with no result yet, I thought I should let you know I have followed up at ANI, where I have broadened the scope of the complaint somewhat. Rivertorch (talk) 10:41, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Category notices
Hi; FYI, please see my comment in this section. Good Ol’factory (talk) 03:04, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Can you tell me which part of my notice was not neutrally worded?-- В и к и  T  04:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
 * There are a couple of different parts that could be interpreted as implying a preference for a particular outcome, though that may not have been your actual intent. In particular, the sentence—"If that argument is accepted, than all subcategories from Category:LGBT people by occupation will probably be deleted." That statement (1) is speculative, (2) is very probably not true, (3) goes beyond the necessarily information to inform others of the discussion, and (4) inflates the importance of the individual discussions to appear to make their saving necessary in order to save the entire Category:LGBT people by occupation tree. Based on this sentence, a user might well be influenced to !vote "keep" on the individual discussions because he wants to keep the Category:LGBT people by occupation tree rather than !voting on the merits of the individual discussions themselves. With these types of notices, less is usually better to maintain neutrality and the appearance of neutrality. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

thank you --Mstudiodf (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification of discussion
A few months ago, you participated in a discussion on Wikipedia talk:Did you know about Gibraltar-related DYKs on the Main Page. I am proposing that the temporary restrictions on such DYKs, which were imposed in September 2012, should be lifted and have set out a case for doing so at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/Gibraltar-related DYKs. If you have a view on this, please comment at that page. Prioryman (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Note
Yeah, I just saw your revert. (I didn't see it until after my second edit.) Sorry about that bad edit summary. I really did get the 404 error...in hindsight I think it may have been because I was clicking on the link from a diff. Even though the edit summary was wrong, I still think the removal was valid for other reasons. ~Adjwilley (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't have opinion on inclusion of Eckists. I only reverted because link was working. If you want to remove Eckists for other reasons, I will not revert.-- В и к и  T  20:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I will probably do that, per WP:STATUSQUO and because the link was forced in by edit warring. I personally think the group is not nearly notable enough for mention. ~Adjwilley (talk) 20:57, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Sometimes as an ordinary contributer I feel somewhat powerless when up against an administrator that knows the system better than I do. I've never been out to distort articles and promote something that isn't there. All I want to do is improve visbility and coverage of LGBT issues in a modest and balanced way. Contaldo80 (talk) 15:42, 17 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I'd appreciate your advice though on how to handle the material on Mehmed II. My concern is that this will be lost as other editors ignore requests to engage in debate. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:28, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


 * I have no opinion on whether to include this material, but if they refuse to discuss, then feel free to restore deleted text after the protection expires. Perhaps you should call them again to discuss the issue on the talk page.-- В и к и  T  09:09, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you very much with your help in getting my name settled there. — Ched : ?  16:35, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

2guys1horse.com
Hi, just letting you know that although you nominated 2guys1horse.com for deletion, someone has already redirected the page to Enumclaw horse sex case—you seem to have accidentally added the AfD template to the target page, so I've removed it. Scratch that; your edit beat mine! – 296.x (talk) 11:25, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, the article is redirected at 07:18‎, 22 April 2013, and I nominated it for deletion at 07:19, 22 April 2013‎. I don't know how to close AFD discussion?-- В и к и  T  11:34, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * You can withdraw the nomination and, in this case, close as speedy keep. There are instructions on how to close it; I would only bother carrying out the first step (just "Closing the AfD", not "Carrying out the AfD close" on down) as it was an accidental nomination. – 296.x (talk) 11:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. It's done.-- В и к и  T  11:54, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Is the content itself even viable for the merge-target, or are the refs that support it (as the AFD nom says) too unreliable and/or the site not notable enough to avoid WP:UNDUE? DMacks (talk) 12:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
 * It should not be merged. The only reliable source (Seattle Times) does not mention this site, other sources are completely unreliable.-- В и к и  T  12:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions =
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:23, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

FYI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. You aren't really the subject of it, only mentioned, but better safe than sorry thought I'd tell you. ''CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie &#x1f5fd; 01:36, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Serbian help needed
Hello Wikiwind, I'm contacting you because we need some Serbian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Serbian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Jovanovic
I posted the bib.irb.hr link for Jovanovic's doctoral thesis – http://bib.irb.hr/prikazi-rad?lang=en&rad=385960 – to the Croatian biography's talk page last night. Article unchanged, still locked. Andreas JN 466 15:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I saw your comment last night. I expected from them to remove that content, not because they want to but as a part of damage control, but it seems that I was wrong. Aministrator who locked the article has made a lot of edits since then, so he probably saw your comment but chose not to respond. This morning, one user posted a link to facebook profile of that administrator, where he had picture of Ante Pavelić in his gallery. He quickly deleted the picture, but I have screenshot.-- В и к и  T  16:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I noticed that they do actually cite a secondary source further down: Still, the statement that there is no ID number for him is just plain wrong, and it's clear that much of the paragraph is original (and faulty) research by people who don't like him. Not good. Best, Andreas  JN 466 16:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Response to e-mail
For some reason, the e-mail reply I've sent you has bounced. Here's the answer:


 * Pozdrav! Ne suradjujem cesto na hr wikipediji pa se ne smatram kompetentnim da o tome komuniciram s Jimbom, ali razmisljam o tome da napisem osobno misljenje o trenutacnom skandalu na svojim korisnickim stranicama na engleskoj i na hrvatskoj vikipediji.  Hocu li to uciniti ovisi o vremenu, a ako se to dogodi javit cu vam.


 * U zadnjih par dana od kad se digla ova b(r)uka naisao sam na nekoliko komentara na hr wikipediji koji se dijelom slazu s kritikama, pa mozete mozda kontaktirati njihove autore. To su par suradnika koji su na kaficu izrazili svoje neslaganje s "demantijem", zatim Flopy i Megnut, cija se misljenja o ovoj situaciji razlikuju i od vecine administratora i medjusobno, te Fausto koji je napustio Hr wikipediju pred par godina iz nevezanog razloga ali je opsirno pisao o problemima na njoj.


 * Hvala na povjerenju i sretno. – MirancheT C 19:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
 * OK. If you change your mind, here is the link:User_talk:Jimbo_Wales -- В и к и  T  19:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I had a chance to get a better sense of what's been going on so I left a comment on Jimbo's page. – MirancheT C 23:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter
Books and Bytes Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013 by , Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved... New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted. New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis?? New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration Read the full newsletter ''Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)''

The Wikipedia Library Survey
As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 15:31, 9 December 2013 (UTC)