User talk:Wikiz876

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Verdena with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Verdena&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   01:06, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to East Coast hip hop, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Noise rock into Punk rock. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to make a note in an edit summary at the source page as well. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. --IllaZilla (talk) 21:13, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Hip hop music. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 07:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Generation Y, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 18:23, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to 1990s. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:00, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to White Anglo-Saxon Protestant, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.  Mbinebri  talk &larr; 23:41, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hip hop music, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 08:31, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Warning 2
Please do not remove content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, Human skin color, Mike Tyson, Generation Y, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Such repeated actions may be treated as disruption of wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:26, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The Rumble in the Jungle, you may be blocked from editing. Staszek Lem (talk) 23:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation in your restored edit of "Mike Tyson". Please be aware that without proper edit summary, removal of references or referenced text does not look good. Staszek Lem (talk) 02:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Changing Dates on Gen X and Y Page
There are a number of sources that show 1982 as an end year for Generation X. See as followed. In addition there was a previous consensus conducted by users of the Generation X page where we came to an agreement to use years 1981 and 1982. Before you change the dates, please read the talk page and the previous consensus. Thank you.

Elwood Carlson "The Lucky Few: Between the Greatest Generation and the Baby Boom"

“Factoring for X: An Empirical Study of Generation X’s Materialistic Attributes” Nora M. Martin: University of South Carolina and Diane Prince: Clayton State University; Year of Publication Unknown; Journal of Management and Marketing Research. Generation X 1960-1982.

“Commerce Concepts”: Market Updates, Asset Allocation and Investment Education for Plan Participants and Individuals. Volume 12, issue 2, 2nd quarter; 2008. Generation X: Born Years 1965-1982.

“Generations at Work”; Andrew Schwartz; April 22, 2009. Generation X: Born 1965-1982.

Steadfastly Forward”; Timothy R. B. Johnson, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI Received for publication February 24, 2005; revised May 5, 2005; accepted August 1, 2005. Generation X 1965-1982. “Tools for Effective Teaching”; Judy Campbell ARNP: Ed.D. Christine Brooks MSN, FNP-BC; Palm Beach Atlantic University School of Nursing; November 10, 2008. Generation X Born 1965-1980 (1982), Generational Classroom Implications Chart: Gen X (1965-1982).

“Maximizing Return on Your Training Investment: A Reference Guide for Managers”; Michael Polowy, Andrew Reitz, and Floyd Alwon: (Year of publication unknown). Generation X 1965-1982.

“Recruiting Ideas for a New Generation” Sharon Cureton, IPMA-CP Human Resources Director City of Daphne; (Year Published Unknown): Generation X (1965-1982).

“The Organizational Generation Gap”; Pharmafocus July 2008; Wiley-Blackwell Publications; Generation X 1965-1982.

“Generations X and Y in Law School: Practical Strategies for Teaching the 'MTV/Google' Generation” Joan Catherine Bohl Stetson University - College of Law Loyola Law Review, Vol. 54, p. 1, Winter 2009  Stetson University College of Law Research Paper No. 2009-21. Generation X 1965-1982. “NJPS 2000: Jewish Baby Boomers”; NORTH AMERICAN JEWISH DATA BANK; Laurence Kotler-Berkowitz; Director, Research and Analysis United Jewish Communities; June 5, 2006. Generation X 1965-1982.

“Opinion: American Generations and the Happiness Index”; Samantha A. Torrence; July 1, 2008; Digital Journal; Generation X 1965-1982.

“Facilitating the Career Development of Today’s and Tomorrow’s Academic Rheumatologists”; Janet Bickel: Career and Leadership Development Coach and Instructor; March 14, 2009. Generation X 1965-1982.

“Generation X” Generational Advisor Newsletter (2009), Generation X 1965-1985 and Generation Y 1983-2002. http://generationaladvisor.com/2009/03/generational-primer-gen-x/

Caroline Perkins; “Don't lose all the best Gen-X talent.” (Generation X, born between 1964 and 1982) (Editorial) ID: The Voice of Foodservice Distribution, May 1, 1998, Vol. 34, Issue 5, p15. Frank Feather “Future Consumer.Com: “The Webolution of Shopping to 2010”, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2001. Gen X – Born 1965-1982, Web-Gen 1983-2000. “Wham! Boom! On the brain”; The Los Angeles Times June 25, 2008, RACHEL ABRAMOWITZ Generation X 1965-1982. http://articles.latimes.com/2008/jun/25/entertainment/et-brief25/2

Generational Cycles in Mass Psychology: Implications for the George W. Bush Administration by Ted Goertzel, Rutgers University “Hancock, Obama and the summer of heroes: What does the influx of super-human power say about society?” http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-brief25-2008jun25,0,2013251.story Generation X born 1965-1982

The University of Adelaide Today's generations can be described as matures (1900-1946), baby boomers (1946-1964), generation x (1965-1982) and net generation (1982-1991). http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/online/current/pedagogy/

What makes a Christmas classic? Generations cherish different yuletide traditions Carl Hoover Tribune-Herald entertainment editor Thursday December 23, 2010 http://www.wacotrib.com/accesswaco/arts/What-makes-a-Christmas-classic-Generations-cherish-different-yuletide-traditions.html Generation X 1965-1982.

Birmingham Business Journal “Age differences challenge managers” Birmingham Business Journal - by Tiffany Ray, Staff http://www.bizjournals.com/birmingham/stories/2005/11/21/story5.html Generation X 1965-1982

In Mixed Company: Communicating in Small Groups and Teams J. Dan Rothwell

Educatedlady (talk) 06:42, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to Hip hop music. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 06:07, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Gangsta rap. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 19:13, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1990s. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Taroaldo (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Curb Chain. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Chain (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2000s energy crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CFTC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:24, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for rapid fire editing, vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — G FOLEY   F OUR!  — 01:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)