User talk:Wikki cinematic universe

March 2023
Hello, I'm 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco. I noticed that you recently removed content from Christopher (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

R. L. V. Ramakrishnan moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, R. L. V. Ramakrishnan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 15:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of R. L. V. Ramakrishnan


The article R. L. V. Ramakrishnan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of R. L. V. Ramakrishnan


A tag has been placed on R. L. V. Ramakrishnan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Tollens (talk) 07:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of R. L. V. Ramakrishnan for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article R. L. V. Ramakrishnan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/R. L. V. Ramakrishnan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''

Your frequent, widespread and unexplained changes to the summary of critics' reviews of films are disruptive.

'' &mdash;  Archer1234  (t·c) 14:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Bro Daddy. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Your edit was a misrepresentation of the view of critics, including the source you cited. &mdash;  Archer1234  (t·c) 14:38, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at CBI 5: The Brain, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kala (2021 film). - Arjayay (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pattabhiraman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 (film). - Arjayay (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2018 (film). - Arjayay (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 15:36, 9 June 2023 (UTC)