User talk:Wikpedia Emperor

January 2017
The article Comparisons between Donald Trump and Fascism was in need of considerable clean up before it is suitable as a Wikipedia article. If the article were left as it was when you created it, then it is likely that it would be deleted, and if not then it would not make a good impression on any reader of the encyclopaedia who saw it. I have therefore moved it to Draft:Comparisons between Donald Trump and Fascism. You may work on it there, and when you think it is ready to be posted as an article you can submit it for review by clicking the "Submit your draft for review" link. A reviewer will then decide whether to accept the page as an article, and if not, he or she will give yu guidance as to what improvement is needed. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:06, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Ok. Well, I don't really have much much time to write anything now or very soon, so I thought others could collaborate once I posted the article and provided the sources establishing notability of the topic. I do think I have more than an adequate amount of reliability sources to establish that this is an extremely notable topic, which has been discussed ad nauseaum everywhere I  preferred initially not to say too much to avoid objections based on the content. Maybe I'll write this in the future, but to be perfectly honest, I'd rather see if the article stays before I spend any time working on it..I think I've added a more than adequate amount of sources to meet notability guidelines, and I noted that it's a stub. I guess I'm not really sure why you wouldn't leave it open and put it to a vote before expecting it to be written on- I don't see why the topic and the sources are not sufficient to determine whether it meets notability. You haven't really indicated what your problem is here. I didn't think articles just got deleted for being stubs. I marked it as a stub, and I've seen other articles that are stubs. So what was wrong with it? I didn't really say anything contentious, I just said "this is a notable topic that has been discussed and gave 120 sources to back that up and seed the article. What does "would not make a good impression" mean? Why would it be deleted? You haven't even really explained why you've deleted it. Wikpedia Emperor (talk) 12:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC)