User talk:WildElf

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Transdimensional TMNT.jpeg
Thanks for uploading Image:Transdimensional TMNT.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Taken care of with the proper template. WildElf (talk) 23:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

D&D articles for Wikipedia 0.7
Hi there! :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 18:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Transdimensional TMNT.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Transdimensional TMNT.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Lot
I'm not sure what is going on with your recent  edits to Lot (biblical person). After fault was found with the first edit and reverted back to the status quo, you re-did it without correcting the attribution problem. I neglected to mention that your edit also eliminated one of the three items in the notability sentence in the first paragraph, which at one time had a fourth item noting that Lot's wife became a pillar of salt, which I'm putting back in with my latest edit.
 * That is probably fine. I'm confused by what you are changing, since I didn't change any wording, I just moved the last sentence from the first paragraph to the second paragraph, where it fit better with the context of the article. If there is a missing or erroneous attribution, you are welcome to fix it. Your issue with the word incest is completely besides any point or edits that I made.

I'm sorry for the confusion about the definition of incest. Your second edit summary defining incest is wrong: "The word 'incest' means sexual relations between family members." Look above the opening sentence of the incest article at the hatnote: "This article is about the variable social/legal/religious/cultural infraction of sexual relations with close kin." Before the law of Moses in the Bible, there is no mention of any social, legal, religious or cultural restrictions on sexual relations among near kin. We simply can't claim that Lot committed incest. His daughters seduced him. It sounds like Lot was the victim of sleep rape. Note that sexsomnia, a condition in which a person will engage in sexual activities while still asleep, can be triggered by excessive consumption of alcohol, and there is usually no memory afterwards of the event. "... he perceived not when she lay down, nor when she arose." (Genesis 19:33,35)

I tend to be long winded. Thanks for your patience. &mdash;Telpardec (talk) 13:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I don't understand what Moses has to do with any of this. If a dinosaur raped her father, it is still incest, regardless of what Biblical writings say about it, and regardless if it took place 100 million years before Moses, and regardless of any reasonings or mitigating circumstances. Moses did not create the English language, and even if he did, he has no authority on how we use words today. His opinions on what incest really means have absolutely no place on Wikipedia except in articles about Moses, and Mosaic definitions of sexual acts. The definition of incest is sexual unions between close relatives, and that is exactly what happened between Lot and his Daughters, according to the Jewish and Christian versions of the Bible.


 * However, it's pretty important for Biblical context in later stories that Moab was a child of incest, as it gave moral weight to the desire of the ancient people who told these stories to kill their Moabite neighbors. The entire Old Testament is a web of stories about name calling and insults for the people whom the early Israelites hated and wanted to kill without violating God's commandments against killing (which date back to Noah). Yes, I agree, it's pretty awful that the story in the most popular Bibles makes sure to include a bit where Lot's daughters inexplicably rape their own father and give birth to children of incest, but Wikipedia is about capturing modern interpretations and words and stories and concepts, not limiting them according to some ancient laws, even if those laws are attributed to Moses.


 * You are right in pointing out that Lot was also a victim of rape. Incest does not need to be consensual, and is in fact unfortunately a common additional factor in many cases of rape. The only thing really unusual about the end of Lot's story (beside the motivations of his daughters not being well established for such an offensive violation) is that women were the perpetrators of the rape.

Disambiguation link notification for February 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Apocalypto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Strategicon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strategicon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Strategicon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:19, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gamex


A tag has been placed on Gamex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 21:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Warlord (Dungeons & Dragons) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Warlord (Dungeons & Dragons) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Warlord (Dungeons & Dragons) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Not a very active user (talk) 10:28, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)