User talk:Wild Wolf/Archive 2

Cat
Hi, WW. I see some of the campaign articles are showing up in a new category. If you look in Category:Military operations of the American Civil War I think you'll find that you're duplicating categories. Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The Campaigns and theaters of the ACW category was created back in May 2007 by Roger Davies. I thought that this category was for campaign articles (such as Maryland Campaign) while the Campaigns category was for the campaign battles categories (such as the Battles of the Gettysburg Campaign category). If these categories are duplicates, should the campaigns and theaters category be nominated for deletion? Wild Wolf (talk) 12:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

I apologize for mentioning it. I do not normally worry about these categories because I have a feeling that nobody really uses them for anything. So I do not really know the background of the category, which I had assumed you created because you are adding articles to it. I do not want to get involved with any official discussions about deletions. My personal opinion is that the three categories have names that are confusingly similar and that the campaign articles could easily be put into the same categories as the constituent battle articles. By the way, if you check my user page, you will see that you have not found all of the campaign articles. Hal Jespersen (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Battles of the Expedition to Port Royal Sound of the American Civil War
Category:Battles of the Expedition to Port Royal Sound of the American Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Campaignbox Joint Expedition Against Franklin
Template:Campaignbox Joint Expedition Against Franklin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. —  pd_THOR  undefined | 04:14, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Battles of the Kilpatrick-Dahlgren Raid of the American Civil War
Category:Battles of the Kilpatrick-Dahlgren Raid of the American Civil War, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. McMuff (talk) 20:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Campaignbox Operations near Saint Mark's
A tag has been placed on Template:Campaignbox Operations near Saint Mark's requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --Patar knight - chat/contributions 16:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:13, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 07:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 06:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Your adminship on Wikisource
Hi there, your adminship on Wikisource is currently under discussion in accordance with our policy on restricted access. Your annual confirmation vote has been opposed by three users, thus triggering a confidence vote. Jude (talk) 01:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

83rd Pennsylvania
Saw that you reverted some vandalism on the Battle of Olustee page today. Thanks. I am on the Board of directors for the Olustee Battlefield Historic Site Citizens Support Organization and am Webmaster for our Battle of Olustee Web site at http://battleofolustee.org/.

I see you are interested in Pennsylvania regiments and looked over your list. Why not create a page on the 83rd Pennsylvania in the future? 1st Lt. Oliver Willcox Norton was a private in the 83rd when he and General Dan Butterfield rewrote Tattoo into Taps during the Seven Days Battles in 1862. Norton was in most of the battles in the Eastern theater up to and including Gettysburg, where he was the standard bearer for Col. Vincent and was beside him when he was killed. Years after the war Norton wrote "Attack and Defense of Little Round Top," and a compilation of his war letters, "Army Letters." The latter is hard to find but I have both books. Norton left the regiment in the summer of 1863 to become an officer in the 8th USCT. This regiment fought at the Battle of Olustee and I do an impression of Norton for living history there and at other places.

Our site has a number of pages devoted to Norton (http://battleofolustee.org/8th_usct.html) and I have a history of the Norton family someone sent me.

In Florida, you spend the late Fall, "Winter," and early Spring doing stuff outside. When it gets hot, as it is now, then you do stuff inside. I plan to spend more time on WP now that it is hot. I also plan to do more work on the Battle of Olustee site. I think my first chore will be to rework the Foods of the Civil War page in WP. I have a couple of books here to cite and that article is too scant as it is. Take care and thanks for looking out for the Battle of Olustee page. Obviously, it is on my watchlist and I have heavily edited it as well as the Olustee State Park page.

If you were to work on a 83th Pennsylvania I would be happy to contribute material from Norton's books and other materials I have on him. Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 00:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVIII (April 2009)
The April 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)
The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

re:Milhist assess
You'll almost there with the Civil War trio. I've copied the comments here as they might be archived before you see them.


 * Battle of Elizabeth City - Was wondering if this was B-class. Wild Wolf (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Still start, I'm afraid. It needs more refs and could use an image.  Roger Davies  talk 11:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Battle of Fort Macon - Was wondering if this was B-class. Wild Wolf (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If you get a ref or two into the "Aftermath" section, it meets B-class.  Roger Davies  talk 11:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Battle of New Bern - Was wondering if this was B-class. Wild Wolf (talk) 16:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Good luck! And keep up the good work. Roger Davies talk 11:05, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)
The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)
The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:53, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)
The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)
The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 16:26, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Egyptian jackal
Hy, I wanted to ask whether you have entered all the current information on the egyptian jackal.--Inugami-bargho (talk) 15:40, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!
As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)
The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)
The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Battles in New Mexico and Arizona
Sorry, but I must continue to remove the useles "Confederate Occupation of New Mexico" template. There are at least four different templates all for the battles in New Mexico and Arizona during the American Civil War, another is not nesseccary. The Conederates did not occupy southern Arizona, it was their own territory which had it's beginning before the Civil War. Later the Southern Arizonans and Southern New Mexicans joined the Confederacy and became a Confederate territory. The only engagements in New Mexico that can be considered part of an occupation are the ones above the 34th parallel, the battles in the New Mexico Campaign and the battles involving native Americans. The occupation of Santa Fe and Albuquerque would be examples of a Confederate occupation of New Mexico.

The occupation of Mesilla, below the 34 parallel, first Arizonan militia of Confederate Arizona and the town of Mesilla, aided John R. Baylor's army, defeated the Union garrison of Fort Filmore and basically liberated the Confederates living in the town, they did not occupy Mesilla, they were welcomed by the rebel Arizonans who requested their aid. What I am trying to say is the Confederates did not occupy southern Arizona and southern New Mexico like the Allies did Germany during and after World War 2. The campaign was simply fought between rebel Arizona militia of Confederate Arizona, with aid from John R. Baylor's Texas cavalry and later Henry Sibley's army, against the Union Army and northern New Mexican militia.

The New Mexico campaign already has a template so the only one left is a template such as "Battles in Union New Mexico", for engagements such as the Navaho expedition in 1864 in northern Arizona and for battles involving Union and Confederate forces above the 34th parallel in Northern New Mexico. (there were skirmishes between New Mexican insurgents and Union forces in northern New Mexico, those engagements should have some light shown on them.) Please give me a response and do not re-add the template, it has no use, especially when half the battles are excluded from the "Confederate Occupation of New Mexico" template, which is something you must explain to me. Thanks for reading all of this, I hope I made no spelling mistakes.--Az81964444 (talk) 07:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)
The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)
The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 05:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)
The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)
The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Wikisource
Hey mate, just curious if you were coming back to Wikisource? I know there was a flare-up, but I hope it was recognised for what it was - a single incident that nobody considers to have been fair to you; hence its overturn. We definitely miss your presence on the project, you were one of our hardest workers and had more than a few good ideas on the direction of the project. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 02:56, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:13, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Operation Brothers At War
I saw that you joined up over at Operation Brothers at War and I just wanted to welcome you to the project and tell you that I look forward to working with you. I know the project is a little unorganized at the time being, but that shall be changing shortly. Feel free to ask me any questions. Best Regards, LeonidasSpartan (talk) 19:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LI (May 2010)
The May 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:54, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LII (June 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:50, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIII (July 2010)
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 19:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Question
Many thanks for rating Targeted killing. A quick question. The "start" rating makes it appear as though you have reviewed it, and it is start quality. In fact, I gather that you have only rated it start quality because one of the various rating aspects (citations) has not yet been engaged in (and the others are "B" quality). I wonder whether that does not, however, make it appear to the reader as though the article is start quality -- a conclusion that has not been reached (and may well not be the case). Given that, if you agree, does it not perhaps make more sense to leave it as unrated for mil his purposes, rather than make it appear to be of that lower quality? Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:37, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 14:18, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

The Peacemakers
Thanks for the WPMILHIST class review. It looks like the only area keeping The Peacemakers from being a B-class article is "B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations." From my limited wikipedia experience, it appears that the major points do have citations. Can you please advise? Thanks in advance! Scewing (talk) 21:12, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hamas and the Taliban analogy‎


The article Hamas and the Taliban analogy which you recently rated "B class" as part of the Military history WikiProject has been proposed for deletion. Feel free to join the discussion. Marokwitz (talk) 11:06, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVI, October 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Gordon Steege
Hi mate, when you assessed this for MilHist you made all criteria "yes" but left Class as "Start" -- although the code treats it as an overall B, could I get you to confirm that's what you meant? If you think it's a B, best that the Class paramenter says so as well to be clear... ;-) Tks/cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:25, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

SS Persier
Are you sure that the article is only Start class? It was rated as start class before I considerably expanded it. Mjroots (talk) 20:55, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LVII, November 2010
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

The Bugle: Volume LVIX, January 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 17:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Message from BMSprint
I'm contacting you because I wanted to talk to you about your 'monarchist' userbox. We can talk back and forth, edit my user talk page here I am just curious about the different reasons people identify as monarchists! BMSprint (talk) 19:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LX, February 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:04, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Wyse Fork
Hi, friend. I just saw your Confederate Order of Battle piece in the New Articles queue. I was wondering if I could persuade you to add a short introductory paragraph and a link or two explaining the what, where, and when of that battle along with a link or to a main article. I was a little lost without it. I hope you agree this would improve the piece. Nice contribution! Carrite (talk) 16:35, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXI, March 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 05:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXII, April 2011
To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 00:01, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIII, May 2011
To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:47, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Battle of the Wilderness GA review
Hi there. I notice that you maintain the above article, so I was hoping you could help with the GA review here. Thanks Wild Wolf (talk) 19:03, 22 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't see that any review activity is taking place. What would you like me to do? Hal Jespersen (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Jackson's Valley Campaign articles
Hi. Yesterday, I was enthused that someone was finally starting to clean up the Jackson's Valley Campaign articles. I corrected a few typos and then moved on, without recalling that the primary problem with some of these articles is that they are word for word copies from National Park Service articles. The NPS articles are in the public domain and therefore it is legal to copy the text, but over the years Wikipedia has determined that this is plagiarism and now deprecates the practice. I was the original creator of these articles with this text copying, but I have never found the time to go back and rewrite them (and I am quite busy with other projects, so that time will not be available in the near future). I simply added the NPS citations and a note in the talk page that this was a problem. It is not appropriate to remove the NPS citations and simply replace them with other books unless the text is rewritten to remove the plagiarism. Let me know whether you plan to correct this problem or would like me to help. Hal Jespersen (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Thanks. No hurry on my behalf (obviously :-)), although it would be nice to have these corrected by 2012 for the sesquicentennial. By the way, the Jackson's Valley Campaign article has some good detail and citations and none of the plagiarism problems. Hal Jespersen (talk) 21:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIV, June 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 00:23, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Battle of the Wilderness
Hi can you view Talk:Battle of the Wilderness and comment. Jim Sweeney (talk) 06:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi, WW. Given this demonstration of arbitrary opinions, you may see why I never bother to nominate articles I've written. Please do me a favor and do not nominate any more of my ACW articles for review unless you choose to undertake major rewrites yourself first. Thanks. Hal Jespersen (talk) 18:04, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Just to point out that anyone can nominate at GA review, without having edited the article. Also you might want to read WP:OWN. Jim Sweeney (talk) 18:35, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXV, July 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:26, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 18:55, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Oak Grove
Wild Wolf,

Article: Battle of Oak Grove

Do you know what "Units Involved" on the United States (Union) side was? (In the Infobox section). Adamdaley (talk) 05:02, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Is there anything else you can contribute to the above article? I'll also contact another user who has helped with the article if that user can contribute a tiny bit more to it. It would be appreciated!  Adamdaley (talk) 22:54, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Battle of White Oak Swamp
Wild Wolf,

Article: Battle of White Oak Swamp,

Could you add information such as the "Units Involved" and "Strength" in the Infobox and possibly any other information in the Infobox. Adamdaley (talk) 12:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

1st Arkansas Infantry Regiment
Would you access 1st Arkansas Infantry Regiment against Class B requirements? Thanks!Aleutian06 (talk) 14:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Thoroughfare Gap
Hi there. I did a couple of minor edits. Do you really have the 1993 edition of Hennessy's book? I have never seen any version other than the 1999 University of Oklahoma paperback. The page numbers appear to be the same. Hal Jespersen (talk) 00:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Monmouth OOB
I rewrote the Monmouth order of battle with much more comprehensive data. At first I hesitated to do it, but I finally removed the Dr. Jeff Glasco order of battle. The 2-5 and the SK notations are fine for a war game but they just didn't look right in an article. Also, it was uncited, or at least it was not cited in the normal way to a book, magazine or internet article. If the professor wants to add his strength information back in, he can do so and I hope he will cite it. Ironically, much of my information also comes from a war game (cited), which however gave an order of battle down to regimental level. I submitted it for B-class review. Djmaschek (talk) 02:25, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

50th United States Colored Infantry Regiment
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 50th United States Colored Infantry Regiment, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.civilwarreference.com/armies/commands.php?comID=501.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)