User talk:Wildad

Regarding the deletion of G. Edward Griffin
I am not familiar with the particular article, so i can't judge if the deletion was conform the rules. In case the article has been deleted, and you wan't to challenge this deletion, you might want to read Deletion_review to determine the necessarily steps for this. Re-creating the article with a request to undelete however, is in violation of the CSD guidelines. Such articles will just be removed. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 13:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of G. Edward Griffin
A tag has been placed on G. Edward Griffin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 13:29, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/LakeOswego for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. &mdash; Scientizzle 02:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)