User talk:Wildaztec

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Roeey.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Roey.jpg. The copy called Image:Roey.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:32, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Roe
Chris Roe has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 20:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:P10exr1f0S0s04.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:P10exr1f0S0s04.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)