User talk:Wildwikiwookie

Regarding your link additions to Jimmy Wales
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:02, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

How many links are the hoi poloi allowed to add then Master? Wildwikiwookie (talk) 08:07, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not accuse other editors of vandalism
In content disputes such as this, accusing other editors of vandalism is not polite. Please respect that others may have a different opinion about what should be on Jimbo's userpage, and that our external links policy should be followed. This edit, in particular, violated WP:EL. Please do not accuse editors who follow our policies of vandalism. Thank you, Kusma (talk) 08:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

But it's ok for them to accuse me of spamming? I see. Whatever you say great leader. Wildwikiwookie (talk) 08:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * When you have multiple people removing the links, and only you adding them, then you need to step back. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 08:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Forty million germans can't be wrong you mean? I wish you had told the allies that before WW2. Could have saved a lot of bloodshed. Wikipedia is a joke. Goodbye. Wildwikiwookie (talk) 10:12, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Your userpage
I saw the message on your userpage. Non-administrators do have rights here. I am not an administrator and have had good luck editing here. Sorry to see you go. Jons63 (talk) 08:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Haven't logged out yet. Wikipedia is a failed experiment as far as I'm concerned. While researching the "far far far too long" list of links that very very very briefly appeared at the Jimmy Wales page I came across a lot of worrying articles which I dismissed out of hand. Similarly I've come across a lot of disgruntled users. Nobody seems to stick around here very long except a thousand odd administrators. I'm a linguist and spotting the same person using multiple names is rather easy for me. I've seen no less than 6 examples of administrators backing themselves up in debates. Just in the last week. This is my last message. I hope your luck continues. Wildwikiwookie (talk) 09:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Shut the hell up you fraud. Timeshift (talk) 17:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Timeshift9 gives a classic example of the type of bullying which goes on around here. Anyone an administrator dislikes is instantly defamed and attacked personally. You will find better behaviour amongst a troop of monkeys than among the administrators here. Jimmy Wales himself has been caught out embezzling money and vandalising pages in exchange for secret payments. Its been reported widely in the media. Yet anyone who follows the tutorial advice and 'dives right in' is called a vandal and hounded by the executive elite here. Wildwikiwookie (talk) 06:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC)