User talk:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI/Archive 1

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI! Thank you for your contributions. I am Vanjagenije and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!  Vanjagenije  (talk)  19:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Unspecified source/license for File:Dasho Dawa Dem.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dasho Dawa Dem.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like (to release all rights),  (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 13:00, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dawa Dem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhutanese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:40, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Arati Saha Google Doodle.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Arati Saha Google Doodle.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement&#32;of https://www.google.com/doodles/arati-sahas-80th-birthday. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wikiacc (¶) 23:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please go ahead with the deletion. I realised the file was copyrighted only after I uploaded it. It was a mistake and I'll ensure it never happens again. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 00:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Restore my updation.
http://www.keralaculture.org/malayalam-language/547 This is my source. I changed the origin and etymology of malaylam which is written wrong. Please restore my updation. Realknowledgesharer90 (talk) 08:13, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please see my message on your talk page. Regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 08:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the rv, that was my dumb! I was actually looking for the copyright violation by that editor, and mistook your last revert for another edit by them. –Austronesier (talk) 08:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * All cool, no harm done. Cheers, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 08:52, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

access to book
Do you have digital or physical access to C. T. Dorji's book "100 Prominent People of Modern Bhutan"? I imagine it would be very useful in creation of many Bhutanese biographies. If yes, would it be possible to email portions of the book? Regards, TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 11:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't. I only saw a web preview of the book. Lots of pages were skipped, but as luck would have it, two out of three pages on Dawa Dem were in the preview. This is where I saw it: https://www.exoticindiaart.com/book/details/100-prominent-people-of-modern-bhutan-NAM619/. The free web preview contains only bits of Jigme Singye Wangchuck, Dawa Dem, Dr. Dechen Tsering, Rinzin Ongdra Wangchuck, Jey Yeshey Singye and Je Yonton Tharchhin. Dechen Pem and the current Druk Gyalpo are the only ones with complete entries freely visible.
 * Oops, forgot to sign off... Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 12:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Btw, can you read the Tibetan alphabet? Then you can copy-paste Dawa Dem's name from the BBS obituary to use in the infobox. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 12:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I somehow missed to reply to this, sorry about that. And sadly I can't read write Tibetan either. And while copy pasting doesn't really require any language skills, checking the BBS obituary, I couldn't find her name written in Dzongkha? Sorry for this delay and regards, TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 01:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * BBS has a full Dzongkha version of the page. That's why I asked if you could read Tibetan. And thanks for the 'star. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 02:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I applaud your superior source finding skills. This is the second time I'm checking the BBS page and I still can't find the link to Dzongkha version from the English version page. But yeah, isolating her name from that page shouldn't be too hard, I'll try to post it today. Regards, TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 02:47, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I see the Dzongkha bit. Where did you get it from? I've found this: འདི་ཡང་ instead. The Wiki article on Ashi also gives the Dzongkha version of Dasho, which is དྲག་ཤོས. In the BBS page, my version འདི་ཡང་ is found right after the word དྲག་ཤོས. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 03:32, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * No, no, sorry, I think you're right. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 03:43, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
 * After what happened with the Scots Wikipedia, I understand that that I shouldn't be writing languages I have zero understanding of with scripts I have zero understanding of. The spelling I pasted was given to me by another Bhutanese friend familiar with Dzongkha, so it shouldn't have any errors. Only prominent Wikipedia user, that I know of, with Dzongkha understanding is, currently inactive/not very active. But there are probably many Tibetan users available, so try to cross check with them. Regards, TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 04:07, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited SJK(C) Damansara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Dawa Dem
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Keiji Nishioka
Hello! Your submission of Keiji Nishioka at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm extremely sorry, I saw your message here but I subsequently forgot all about it. I see TryKid has solved the issue. Thanks for the promotion, and again, sorry for the delay. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 15:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dawa Dem
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dawa Dem you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jon698 -- Jon698 (talk) 16:02, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The wait icon on second criteria is for the overall verifiability, not copyvio/plagiarism. As Jon698 explains at the GA review page, the dates aren't cited in the infobox. Either the dates should be added in the main prose or just repeat the citations in the infobox. I would suggest the former. And of course the first one is self explanatory: expand the lead. Regards, TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 06:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Keiji Nishioka
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dawa Dem
The article Dawa Dem you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dawa Dem for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jon698 -- Jon698 (talk) 01:02, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on your first GA! I hope you keep contributing great things to Wikipedia in the coming days too. Regards, TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 01:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kusuma Hanumantharayappa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kusuma Hanumantharayappa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kusuma Hanumantharayappa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:27, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Not odd
Hi, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI,

In this edit at French language, you said you thought it was "odd" that France wasn't linked; but actually, that's per the style guide; see MOS:OVERLINK. It's not a big deal, and it's fine to leave it that way now, but I thought you might like to know about the "#What generally should not be linked" section of the Style guide on links. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 10:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your source. I am still learning, this will help. Regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 03:49, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Jaichand Page
Hello Kindly Place the Page Of Jaichand on Your watchlist There are guys who are removing High quality sources without explaining anything .2409:4051:4E8E:930C:4976:2E4:C125:5118 (talk) 15:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Dawat-e-Islami extensive talk and NPOV tag
You are more than welcome to discuss the issues outlined in the talk section of that article. Its easy to say I am violating a Wikipeida standard to prevent changes to an article that is grossly incorrect and biased. Zugzwangerone (talk) 04:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Zugzwangerone I warned you for inserting broken external hyperlinks into the lead of the article, not for its content. Now that you fixed it and added it as a citation I have no problem with the article, with which I have no real connection except an obligation to protect it from vandalism - an obligation which I have to every article on the encyclopedia. Since adding random external links in the body of the article is a common action of hit-and-run vandals, I had to warn you with a standard warning to make sure you weren't one. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 04:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

'''I have corrected the error and was in process of doing so as expediently as possible, --the error was in place no more than five minutes! The article's problems are listed in talk.'''

NPOV dispute [Elements sourced but misquoting the works by Thomas K. Gugler and reliance on Primary Sources] Thomas K Gugler, an anthropologist, presents Dawat-e-Islami from a NPOV. I have read and interpreted several of his primary research papers. Guglar research papers are cited arbitrarily throughout the entire article.

This Wikipedia article takes selections of Gugler's work out of context and it omits those sections which are of major importance in providing balance and objectivity to this subject.

Primary Sources

The article provides information on Dawat-e-Islami from Dawat-e-Islami and other outlets. Although this might be acceptable the information presented is without balance.

Gugler references are primary source research papers.

Sources Erroneously Quoted - Limited NPOV Sourcing Available in English, Quality of Supporting Articles.

Found incidents of articles which were quoted; when you check those articles they speak to different issues. In a search for acceptable sources, I found few-none A press release or press recognition about a Charity event may not meet the standard of a supporting article

The Section "Call to Righteousness"

May speak to the mission statement of Dawat-e-Islami but it does so from a perspective of passion. That section relies on a misquote of Gugler and should be incorporated in the first paragraph of this entry. Zugzwangerone (talk) 00:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Identifiable Sources

Book "Karachi: Ordered Disorder and the Struggle for the City - Chapter Jihad Comes to Town" Times of India https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/city-sufi-leaders-oppose-pakistan-based-body-meet-in-hyderabad/articleshow/67249546.cms Concerns regarding links to terrorism https://www.wionews.com/world/suspect-in-new-charlie-hebdo-attack-wanted-to-avenge-prophet-cartoons-330935 Article citing response regarding Charlie Hebdo https://www.rabwah.net/khatm-e-nabuwat-dawat-e-islami-linked-to-murder-of-ahmadiyya-muslim-asad-shah/ Glasgow Murder attributed to Dawat-e-Islami https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/pakistan-news/my-son-has-heart-of-a-lion-says-proud-father-of-pak-man-who-stabbed.html Indirect reference to Charlie Hebdo

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-france-security/paris-knife-attack-suspect-wanted-to-avenge-prophet-cartoons-video-idUSKBN26J1O5 Wearing a long tunic, the suspect said he was spiritually guided by Ilyas Qadri. Qadri is a Sunni cleric and the founder of Dawat-e-Islami, a non-violent organisation spread across the globe. Qadri says a person who commits blasphemy should be handed in to police, but if another individual were driven by their emotions to kill the blasphemer, the law should not apply.

Charlie Hebdo - NPOV lacking due to omission

So essentially the founder of Dawat-e-Islami is advocating that murder is justified should an apostate blaspheme his religion. This is a salient point both for this entry and the entry for Charlie Hebdo I was not aware of this until I started researching the topic looking for links.

Zugzwangerone (talk) 04:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zugzwangerone (talk • contribs)

Indigenous peoples
Hi,

I just wanted to give a heads up that I may have inadvertently reverted some of your editorial changes on the Climate change and Indigenous peoples, particularly as it relates to the capitalization of "Indigenous". In my experience, "Indigenous" tends to be capitalized as a proper noun (see, for example, recommendations in Elements of Indigenous Style). I was planning on doing some more edits on the page (mainly grammatical/stylistic), but will hold off on adjusting the capitalization if you're committed to lowercase.

Jordanbkinder (talk) 19:53, 30 November 2020 (UTC)Jordanbkinder
 * But I thought I left all Is capitalised for the word Indigenous? I only made the other words in the titles lowercase, because section headings should not normally contain capital letters. If I have inadvertently de-capitalised the word Indigenous you can go ahead and change it. Thanks and regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 04:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Revert
I'm assuming this was the edit you were trying to revert? Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Ah, no, I wasn't trying to revert that one (thanks for spotting and fixing it btw, I didn't see it on Recent Changes Patrol), I just thought that the name of the person leading the inquiry was not particularly relevant. If it was then let it be included. Regards Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 17:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Elements of Art
Hello i just got this message in my Notifs:

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Elements of art. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Specifically, changing American spellings to British, and vice versa, where such a change is not required according to the Manual, is strictly disallowed.

1. I did not deliberately edit this page in a 'unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand' way. Color is unusual as Colour is the correct spelling of this word. How is this this strictly disallowed when all i was trying to do was fix a spelling mistake on this page! Who gets to say the 'American English' is more right then the way it should be spelt?!? ChuckyDooDaa (talk) 04:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello! I did not actually mean to say that your edit was unusual or difficult to understand - the message I posted is a stock warning that is posted by a bot I use while reverting inappropriate edits. Coming to the actual issue of spelling, Wikipedia's Manual of Style prohibits the changing of British spelling to American and vice-versa in situations like this, as dictated in the section MOS:RETAIN. You are correct in that there is no form of English 'more correct' than another; therefore, in these cases, whatever existing style is there must be retained as the MOS requires. I have no personal interest in ensuring the retention of American spelling, being as I am a user of British spelling myself. Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 11:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

User:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI Thanks, sorry if that came out rude i was just kinda annoyed. I did some googling and a fair few pages say that America is the only country to primarily spell it 'color', and the rest of the English speaking world 'Colour'. Shouldnt this mean the majority of the spelling should be shown on Wikipedia, which is used all across the world, so it suits more people then just Americans? Thanks. ChuckyDooDaa (talk) 23:34, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
 * It is true that US and Canada are unique in their spelling among English-speaking countries, but it is American English that is the dominant form of English globally, that is, including non-English speaking countries (save for India, maybe). This is an important point, as many non-English speakers also refer to the English Wikipedia, as it is the most reliable among all Wikipedias. Additionally, even among the Anglophone countries, Canada and the US account for a large proportion of the populace. I hope this answers your questions. Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 06:01, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

@User:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI Thanks that makes sense i guess, i hope in the future i will be able to help Wikipedia in more productive ways. Regards, ChuckyDooDaa — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckyDooDaa (talk • contribs) 04:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * That's the spirit I wish everybody who makes edits here had! The bureaucracy and rules here might be frustrating to beginners, but as one stays on in the editing sphere, one realises just how important they are to preserve Wiki as an enyclopaedia. Unfortunately, as an unavoidable casualty, too many beginners are scared off by these rules; I am happy that you are not one of them. Happy editing! Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 14:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

@User:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI Another idea, Im guessing your not the head of Wikipedia, but i was thinking they should have seperate languages like: English(American) English(British) in the possible languages? Its hard to explain i hope you get what i mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckyDooDaa (talk • contribs) 22:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Oof, sorry for the late reply, I completely forgot. A separate BrE Wiki... I don't think that will happen, because the dialects are largely exactly the same. A few different spellings do not warrant a whole new encyclopaedia - you see, Wiki is not like a ready-made app where you can switch between different language versions of the same content; every single language has an independent Wikipedia of its own, with a different pool of editors and completely different content. I doubt they'd make a separate British English encyclopaedia - it would basically be a duplication of the whole existing English Wiki just for the sake of a few spellings. Another issue it would cause that once separated, the 'pedias will grow separately of one another, which would disturb intra-language uniformity, if you get what I mean. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 14:19, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

@User:Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI Ok thanks for explaining. Regards Chucky. Also the comment below this has f*ck in it and thats not very family friendly. @ChuckyDooDaa — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChuckyDooDaa (talk • contribs) 23:08, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * You're right, he's not very nice at all. He's been blocked, he abused a few others too. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 14:59, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Would you like me to mkae it censored? Its not very friendly for viewers, especially for younger people.
 * Would you like me to mkae it censored? Its not very friendly for viewers, especially for younger people.


 * Good idea, I removed it myself. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 08:59, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Keiji Nishioka
The article Keiji Nishioka you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Keiji Nishioka for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 16:41, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Keiji Nishioka
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Keiji Nishioka you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 02:21, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Congratulations on your second successful good article nomination. I'm grateful for you great work on Wikipedia and hope that you'll continue it. Best of luck and regards, TryKid&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 16:39, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I hope to be able to do this for a long time to come. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 16:43, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Nithyananda
Looks like you started editing this page. Please refer to the discussion in the section https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nithyananda#Self_styled on the use of the derogatory term "self styled". This is not a term of normal usage for any person. I have seen some good arguments mentioned earlier and have added an important point regarding his nominations. Acnaren (talk) 02:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

India sources
Hi Wilhelm! Re your Discord comment here, could we get those sources added to WP:RSP if they've been discussed enough at WP:RSN? PTI and The New Indian Express appear not to be on there currently. &#123;{u&#124; Sdkb  }&#125;  talk 18:36, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Talk:Fuller's Coffee Shop/GA1
Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI, since the original reviewer has not posted to this review since they opened the page, it's time to consider it abandoned. (I've said as much on the review page.) I notice that you did a review in their absence.

I would appreciate it if you would take over the review and complete it, including (if appropriate) final passage. If you aren't prepared to do this, please let me know and I'll find someone else to take over. Thank you very much. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * , I'll do it. Thanks for reminding me, I'd forgotten completely - I'm in the middle of a kind of content creation project, and also got involved in what was almost an edit war. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 06:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK review - Template:Did you know nominations/The Doctor and Student
Hi there. I have my QPQ review prepared, but there's one point I'd like clarification on before submitting it. The article I've reviewed (but not the nomination itself) contains an image of doubtful copyright status. Should this be raised as an issue in the DYK? The guideline only seems to cover the text of the article. Thanks again for your assistance! Tevildo (talk) 16:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , yes, it definitely must be raised as an issue. Copyvios must be filtered out at all stages. I suggest that you start the DYK review, and mention the questionable nature of the copyright status in the review. May I ask which DYKN it is? Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 16:42, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * The DYK is Template:Did you know nominations/Nyasaland Volunteer Reserve. I've published my review and informed the author - I hope that everything is still within process. Tevildo (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , I checked the review - it's all good. I agree, the image of Merriman must be removed if a free or truly PD version can't be found. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 17:31, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * No,, I've asked around, and it apparently isn't a problem. Keep the request for a better version of the picture on the review, but if they don't, or can't, provide another picture, just go ahead anyway. The licence, PD-US, is correct and would allow the picture to have any kind of text on it, without any repercussions. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 17:35, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2020 Sulawesi earthquake


A tag has been placed on 2020 Sulawesi earthquake requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"wrong and duplicate, same exists in 2021 Sulawesi earthquake"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ahmetlii (talk) 08:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Attara Kacheri
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Congratulations
Your DYK hook about the Attara Kacheri drew 8,320 page views (693 per hour) while on the Main Page. It is the one of most viewed hooks so far during the month of February and has earned a place near the top of the Best of February list. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 99.236.119.248 (talk) 03:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC) K'naan's birthday is Febuary 1st not whatever
 * User:99.236.119.248 Most certainly not. The Twitter citation on the article makes it perfectly clear.

I’m proud to have 3 bdays, my Somali one (Jan 1st) My I have no idea where Wikipedia got this shit one (feb 1st) and my real one (apr 16) Feb 2, 2018
 * It is not the best citation for a WP article but it does confirm that Feb 1 is definitely not K'naan's real birthday. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 04:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Merging schedule with Background
Why are you merging elections schedule with Background in 2022 Punjab Assembly Elections Alluburam (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC)


 * I have not merged any sections. I simply deleted the section on demographics. Please do not include the demographics section again. I have explained why at the article talk page, which I asked you to check in my edit summary. Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 10:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Discontent Content Issue 1
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2021 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Tern&#61;&#61;msdskd (talk) 13:44, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Discontent Content Issue 2
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter
The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:


 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
 * Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
 * Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
 * Bennington Flag.svg Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
 * Standard of Oliver Cromwell (1653–1659).svg Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
 * Transgender Pride flag.svg Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
 * Flag of the United Nations.svg Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Mz7 (talk) 21:46, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

About Manjappada logo
Hello, I fixed issue with logo licensing criterias I think. Can you cross check it. Thanks  Poppi fied  talk 05:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC) (talk)

Vasad
Hi, I edited the Vasad page. I didn't remove any content; I reorganized it. Some facts that were in "history" belong in "geography" for example.
 * My apologies, I did not examine your edit properly. Kind regards, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 15:34, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Meux's Brewery Company
Hello, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meux's Brewery Company, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Drayang
Hello, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Drayang, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Trouted
You have been trouted for: Romani people RafaelJC12 (talk) 04:35, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

After I edited this article, adding: "In many other languages, regarding cognates of the word, such as gitano, cigano and gitan, this perception is either very small or nonexistent." You reverted saying: "'this perception is either very small or nonexistent' - claim not corroborated by sources, one of which is a dictionary (!)"

My first objection to this is: Why is it a problem to use dictionary as a source? This page uses Merriam-Webster as its source number 4. I'm not sure why you don't think the other sources corroborate the claim. They don't explicitly restate what I said, but the manner in which the word is extensively used in those texts should imply its connotation. Similarly, I could argue that the word "negro" has very different connotations in English, Spanish and Portuguese by showing how the word is used in different texts. Not only the sources I cited but also the foreign Wikipedia pages I linked do exactly that. I'd also like to ask you whether or not you agree with the claim I made. I understand that, as far as I know, you might not speak Spanish, Portuguese or French, so perhaps you don't know from practice the connotations of these words.
 * You admit that They don't explicitly restate what I said. Then, per Wikipedia policy, you can't use them to justify your claim - because what you are doing is synthesis, assuming certain things and intent that are not explicitly expressed by the sources. Whether I personally agree with your claim or not is not relevant to this discussion. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 04:45, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Also, dictionaries are used to corroborate definitions. I don't contest that the French word indeed means "Romani", just that it does not state non-offensiveness the way your claim needs. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 04:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Indus River
Hi. This revert shows you did not check whether I was correct. That template is also used under the hidden nav boxes. 2A02:C7C:1018:6E00:4C92:78B1:B463:8E6D (talk) 10:40, 29 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Which is what confused me, because I was merely patrolling Pending Changes and could not see the hidden ones. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 10:41, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are able to, could you review the edits I’ve made since then? 2A02:C7C:1018:6E00:4C92:78B1:B463:8E6D (talk) 13:32, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I've reviewed them. Thank you for your edits! Cheers, Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse &#124; fings wot i hav dun 13:46, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Removing your votes at RfA
Please do not delete your vote at WP:Requests for adminship/Vami IV when you change your mind, as it is confusing to readers, particularly not if it entails moving/deleting other editors' comments. Just strike them and indent, adding a small comment pointing readers to what you changed your vote to. You can see examples on said RfA. 192.76.8.80 (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2021 (UTC)