User talk:WilkesJacob

Your edits
Hi Jacob, thanks for your edits. However, I've reverted them because short conjunctions and prepositions are generally not capitalised in titles (see the relevant part of the Manual of Style, which generally applies to all English texts). I've also reverted your edit to Ni Hao, Kai-Lan because you didn't explain it. Graham 87 14:35, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop capitalizing words such as 'of', 'the', 'for', etc
Please stop capitalizing words such as 'of', 'the', 'for', etc. in titles. Proper capitalization rules exclude these words. You were already warned (above) about this 2 days ago. Please see MOS:CT for more information. In part:

''For title case, the words that are not capitalized (unless they are the first or last word of the title) are:


 * Articles (a, an, the)
 * Short coordinating conjunctions (and, but, or, nor ; also for, yet, so when used as conjunctions)
 * Prepositions containing four letters or fewer (as, in, of, on, to, for, from, like, over, with, etc.) but see below for instances where these words are not used as prepositions
 * The word to in infinitives.

Thanks. Logical Fuzz (talk) 06:31, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Frank Dukes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your addition to List of Nicky, Ricky, Dicky & Dawn episodes has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Amaury ( talk &#124; contribs ) 06:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Metro Boomin production discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''This was an unsourced edit. Please find sources before adding this back.'' Lemongirl942 (talk) 19:52, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vinylz. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:35, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 23:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mike Will Made It production discography. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 23:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I have lengthened your block because you appear to have ignored the previous one as you have returned to the same form of editing. Upon your return, please provide sources.  If you don't, your next block will be longer, perhaps even permanent.  If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.--5 albert square (talk) 23:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Nard & B. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Stop!
You really must stop this. None of you edits have sources. None. This makes a huge mess, and diminishes the reliability of Wikipedia. You really must stop. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:04, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. 5 albert square (talk) 02:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * OK, as you have continued to add unsourced content despite my previous block, I have blocked you again. I suggest that you use this time out to read our policies, especially about providing reliable sources and also on why it is important that information is verified.  You have failed to engage with other users as to why you are not providing any reliable sources, therefore we do not know why you are not doing this.  Please start to engage in a conversation with, even though I have blocked you I have not revoked access to your talk page.--5 albert square (talk) 02:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Debmar-Mercury syndicated programs
Hello, WilkesJacob. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, List of Debmar-Mercury syndicated programs, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Xx236 (talk) 12:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of 20th Television distributed programs


The article List of 20th Television distributed programs has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
WNYY98 (talk) 05:42, 3 January 2017 (UTC)