User talk:Wilkistudent

Clayton High School
Hello, I recently removed edits to Clayton High School (Missouri) that were unsourced, and, as far as I could tell, not verifiable (I did a quick check of Google to see who Andreas Thyssen is). I noticed that you restored these edits by reverting me; if you do have a verifiable source to justify the inclusion of Thyssen, it's no problem and my mistake. However, the description of Thyssen seems to violate Wikipedia's Wp: NPOV policy in addition to what I saw as a verifiability issue. If there isn't a source to support the inclusion and the language, I will remove Thyssen again. Thanks. poroubalous (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:2012 Anand Reddi AMA Foundation Award.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:2012 Anand Reddi AMA Foundation Award.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:00, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Anand Reddi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anand Reddi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anand Reddi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC) ==Speedy deletion nomination of File:Prof Hari Reddi shared his knowledge of morphogenesis and tissue engineering of bone and cartilage at the Vice-Chancellor’s seminar.jpg==

A tag has been placed on File:Prof Hari Reddi shared his knowledge of morphogenesis and tissue engineering of bone and cartilage at the Vice-Chancellor’s seminar.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=575227328 your edit] to A. Hari Reddi may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
 * *Nicolas Andry Prize award from the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons in 1999.

Proposed deletion of Metabologen


The article Metabologen has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Neologism that does not meet our notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LT910001 (talk) 17:06, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Metabologen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Metabologen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Metabologen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LT910001 (talk) 09:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)