User talk:William1193/William'sDraft

I read your paper and I'll start with the good. It had a neutral point of view, which follows Wikipedia's regulations. You also had good section headers. Now for what needs work. First the article didn't have any references to show where you got your information. In the editing of the article, after a sentence where you used a source, if you put it will automatically create a section at the bottom of the page and put a number in the text at the end of the sentence (at least it worked that way for me). Second I know this is a draft but it needs some serious work. There are a ton of run on sentences, misspellings, and sentences that don't make sense.