User talk:William3080

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:William3080/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:William3080 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MatthewVanitas&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:William3080 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Orduin was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:William3080/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:William3080 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Orduin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:William3080 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Orduin  Discuss 01:21, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oxycodone, you may be blocked from editing. i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oxycodone&diff=646444638&oldid=646095644 and on Kim Il-sung: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kim_Il-sung&diff=prev&oldid=647465225 William Avery (talk) 08:22, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Slym Jimmy


A tag has been placed on Slym Jimmy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 21:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
Hello, I'm Wgolf. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to King L because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wgolf (talk) 21:46, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rae Sremmurd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 21:47, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jeremih, you may be blocked from editing. Wgolf (talk) 21:48, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Slym Jimmy


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Slym Jimmy, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wgolf (talk) 21:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

April 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Bibby. Wgolf (talk) 21:52, 15 April 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Materialscientist (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)