User talk:WilliamF1two/March 2009 to April 2010

Fair use rationale for File:JordanEJ10.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JordanEJ10.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- Diniz  (talk)  19:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Jordan 194
Hi. When doing the infoboxes for racing cars, please use the template Infobox racing car using the example as a direct guideline. Many thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 16:28, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

2009 Formula One season
The race summaries are not needed as have not been used before. Please don't add them. Chubb enna  itor  18:13, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree with Chubbennaitor here. With these types of articles, we don't have a "definite" format for them yet, none of these types of articles have yet reached FA status, so its hard to get a gauge on what the layout should be like. You are welcome to start a new discussion on WT:F1 if you feel the need too. D.M.N. (talk) 19:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I looked in the 2000-2009 seasons as they are the most up-to-date seasons I know of. There is only one season out 60 you've shown me that it was used, so you should've discussed it's change or add. It was a drastic change that wasn't discussed. You came to me with harsh words on horrible issues and you don't seem to have a reason for me being rude as I didn't tell you off just said 'please don't do that'. I was accused very badly on a very bad day for me. I'm one of the most most respected people at my place of work and I got shouted at, for if you look up, something only one user found properly offensive which wasn't something bad. Now. I came in calmly and I just lost it because you did. Sorry if I got rowdy and you took offense. If it was backed in my quick look over as I hadn't seen it before so I was pretty sure it wasn't liable on the article. Thank you. Please remember to remain civil as you hadn't done your research on me. Chubb  enna  itor  20:16, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Account
Why have you got two accounts? Chubb enna  itor  13:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * What you do is get a new password emailed to you and use that then change your password. Chubb  enna  itor  13:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I'd go to the main help desk if I were you. Chubb  enna  itor  13:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The people would find a way. Chubb  enna  itor  14:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Incorrect
All incorrect. Read them thoroughly. Chubb enna  itor  17:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

April Newsletter
Chubb enna  itor  20:10, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (May)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  02:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (June)
-- Midgrid  (talk)  17:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (July)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  22:54, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (August)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  17:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (September)
-- Midgrid  (talk)  11:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (October)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  16:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (November)
Apologies for the slight lateness! – Cs-wolves  (talk)  00:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Constructor Formula One drivers
I invite you to comment on this. --Falcadore (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, when creating a new category, please put in a sentence or two of explanation as to what the category is, on the category page. Saves some of the confusion you are now experiencing. If it has to be explained to fellow Formula One edittors then the general public readers - who are Wikipedia's target audience and are those who should always be who you are writing for rather than fellow racing fans - will have no hope understanding what your are doing. --Falcadore (talk) 23:16, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Walter Wolf Racing
If someone drove for Walter Wolf Racing it doesn't mean that they drove for Williams. Yes Frank Williams was involved but the Wolf-Williams FW05 was actually a Hesketh. Please get your facts correct before doing these mass edits. Bjmullan (talk) 21:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, please remember that driving a Williams or a McLaren in a GP does not necessarily mean driving for those teams. Many drivers drove older non-works cars, having nothing to do with the factory team. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Point taken, but for the sake of the relevance of the category, they need to be restricted to the works teams. Someone tooling around at the back in a poorly-prepared, year-old McLaren or a heavily-modified Williams bears no relevance to the works team, and in the case of some like Kessel's Apollon-Williams, no real relevance to the constructor either. It would also open up anomalies like Brian McGuire's "self-built" car, which was, in fact, a Williams. It's open to problems if we don't just stick to works drivers. Bretonbanquet (talk) 23:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (December)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  11:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

2010 Australian Open – Men's Singles
Please don't add mid-set scores. Wikipedia isn't a live scoring. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  09:32, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (January)
-- Midgrid  (talk)  20:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

2006 Winter Olympics national flag bearers
Hi,

In the article 2006 Winter Olympics national flag bearers, your lead sentence is as follows:
 * "During the Parade of Nations portion of the 2008 Summer Olympics opening ceremony [...]."

Is this article about the 2006 or 2008 olympics? Further, do you plan on improving the list, or were there only two countries involved? -Zeus-u 23:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry, the lead sentence was an error. The corresponding 2008 article already exists. Obviously more than two nations took part, and I will add them when I have time. Thanks WilliamF1two (talk) 14:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, no problem, I was just a bit confused. Thanks for doing this. -Zeus-u 20:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (February)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  19:53, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

WPF1 Newsletter (March)
– Cs-wolves  (talk)  13:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)