User talk:WilliamRichardEvans

Your submission at Articles for creation: Data Management Framework (October 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Data Management Framework and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Data_Management_Framework Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gbawden&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Data_Management_Framework reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Data Management Framework concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Data Management Framework, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Data Management Framework


Hello, WilliamRichardEvans. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Data Management Framework".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:03, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Data management, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. GermanJoe (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Please read also WP:COI, especially WP:SELFCITE. Wikipedia is no venue to popularize your own research. If this concept has been published in independent secondary sources, you may suggest edits referring to your own research at the articles' respective talkpages - to be reviewed by an uninvolved editor. But please do not spam such content into multiple articles yourself. GermanJoe (talk) 20:13, 8 June 2019 (UTC)