User talk:William Avery/Archive 1

Hello there, welcome to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Help or drop me a line. BTW, nice copyedits on Edmon Halley and tree. Cheers! --maveric149

Hi. You might want to link "Salisbury" on your user page to Salisbury, England as "Salisbury" is a disambiguation page. RedWolf 04:32, Dec 21, 2003 (UTC)

Artefact
Hey, just noticed you replaced "artefact" with "legacy" in Curry. I don't see what's wrong in using "artefact" to mean an inaccuracy borne out of chance and contrary to the the original/natural meaning (vide. OED 2nd Edn. 1989's entry on "artefact"). I'm not saying that "legacy" is wrong, but that it doesn't convey the meaning of inaccuracy that "artefact" does. Ambarish 07:40, 30 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I was looking at COD (2002 I think, don't have it to hand at work). It gave, as I recall, something man made (the sense in which archaeologists use it) and an error that arises from an experimental method (artefacts in a photomicrograph etc). (I hope an article on curry doesn't require usages found only in a larger dictionary.) The real problem is the idea that a loan word need necessarily have the same meaning in the borrowing language that it has in the donor language, and that if it doesn't then some kind of error or 'inaccuracy' has occurred. It is borrowed to fill a linguistic hole, and its meaning will be tuned according to the purposes of the borrowing language to fit that hole. i.e. a generic word was required for the relatively highly spiced Indian dishes which had no name in English and are now called curries; the word borrowed for this purpose may have meant sauce in Tamil, but the mismatch of meanings between the two languages is not an error or inaccuracy in either. This is why I also have a problem with calling it 'inaccurate'. It has a quite reasonably precise, if generic, meaning in English, which can in no way be beholden to its Tamil origin. Election 'candidates' don't have to wear white any more, do they? William Avery 13:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC)


 * I see that the argument is primarily about descriptivism vs. prescriptivism :-), but as I said, "legacy" is fine with me too. Thanks for your response. Ambarish 18:37, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Pedro Lozano article
Thanks for translating the article Pedro Lozano from the Spanish. I'll link to it from the PG catalog. And I'm pretty sure that in the name "P. Pedro Lozano" the initial P. is not part of a proper name, but rather short for "padre". Andrew Sly 17:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes. I just put it into the link to be consistent with the Gutenberg catalog. William Avery 11:34, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
 * PG catalog has been edited to remove the initial in the author heading. Shouldn't have been there in the first place. Andrew Sly 06:39, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Ok, regarding your message on my talk page. Yes, there are countless errors, inconsistancies, etc. in the PG catalog. For an email address to report them, see http://www.gutenberg.org/about/contact All new author headings and titles are added to the catlog automatically, which can create a lot of material to double check. As I type this, I've spent the last hour reviewing "newy posted texts" and have got myself caught up to PG#18303 that was posted Wed, May 3rd. Andrew Sly 06:50, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Downend
I noticed that you edited the Downend page. I feel that the title of "Downend. Bristol" is wrongly implying that the town is part of Bristol, rather than South Glos. What do you think? Fullerov 17:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * See my comments on the article's talk page, which is on my watchlist by the way. Be bold? William Avery 20:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * It wasn't so much the listing as a suburb of Bristol, as downend is definitely continous with Bristol. It was the title of Downend being Downend, Bristol in contrast to say Kingswood which is Kingswood, South Gloucestershire. I don't know how to change this Fullerov 21:40, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the help. Fullerov 16:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Avon as a county
Thank you for the helpful note telling us "I wonder what exactly is meant by "Avon" in this context. Avon (county) no longer exists." on Talk:List of King George V Playing Fields (Avon). Perhaps you woudl go the extra mile and tell me what the county name is? I have been working from pages I have researched onliune. I'm trying to catalogue 471 fields, and would appreciate the rest of the message, rather than just the question you raise Fiddle Faddle 22:02, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

No Rights reserved images
I have no information as to who the copyright holder is. sorry. I have no problem with you deleting or changing it. Lordb 17:42, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

A L E K O S
Hello William! Sorry for the delay in writing. I was a way for some time. The pics you are asking probably are of free use. You can find them in the www and precisely in the links I am providing. Since in most of the pics there is no notice concerning cpyrights, we can assume that there are not copyrighted. Instead, in order to be correct, I assumed that most of those are copyrighted and I gave sources and full explanation. Indeed, we need pics to enhance the article and the persoality of Alekos, the trial, his political action and the recognition of international community. The only pic that we can find explicitly a copright notice is the one in Plazzio Medici. Thankfully, the institute permits explicitly the use of all the info exposed in its sight for educational purposes (they even permit you to print them out via methodes of their own conception) provided a full sitation to the source is done. You can fnd the necessary info in the English version of their site (you can use the link I give). Please, do not hesitate to write me for any forther information you may require. (You can mail me in laonikos@gmail.com), best wishes, Laonikos 12:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This is possibly all well and good for the images uploaded for fair use on en.wikipedia.org, but commons.wikimedia.org should only contain images that are available under a free licence. You would need to produce the names of the copyright holders and evidence that they are willing to licence under a free license. Please consider the possibility that the websites where these images were obtained don't hold the copyright so couldn't help you. Please put any further comments in the correct section of the commons list of deletions http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Deletion_requests#Images_uploaded_by_user:Tarokun1005. William Avery 20:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Doveton Sturdee
Just thought I'd drop a note in appreciation of the improvement you've made to the Doveton Sturdee article (and the picture of him that brings the article to life). :) Euchiasmus 20:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

article mistake

 * Yowzah, thats a long image name! My mistake, i'll keep an eye out for them ones more closely. Thanks for letting me know! JoeBot 14:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 

Is this Pensford?
this pic certainly looks like Pensford to me. You can't see the River Chew as it's hidden in the trees. &mdash; Rod talk 12:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Imber
Thank you very much for the image of St.Giles on the Imber page. Do you know any ex-Imberites? Salisbury is close by, as I recall. This article is close to me since I saw the BBC documentary on Imber. They should certainly be remembered, and the actual refugees (or children thereof) can best tell their tale. Istvan 05:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Wiltshire
Thank you for your additions to Langley Burrell and Maud Heath's Causeway, articles which I created one wistful afternoon. I have been meaning to scan some of my old photographs, but never got round to it. Hornplease 21:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Henrystafforddukebuckingham restored.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Henrystafforddukebuckingham restored.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fred-Chess 12:30, 29 September 2006 (UTC)