User talk:William Bowe

I am a PhD student in political science and publisher of the Australian psephological site The Poll Bludger, which is frequently cited in Wikipedia's more obscure entries on Australian politics. From time to time I find myself correcting errors and filling blanks in these entries, but for the most part my own site is all the outlet I need for this line of interest. I am also a regularly published rock music critic and will occasionally contribute on pop cultural matters when the inspiration strikes.

Speak to me
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_Bowe" Hi there. Sorry if this is the wrong page to be putting talk on to, but I was unable to find where else to. Your links and info for the 2006 SA election on poll bludger have been invaluable. One thing I had noticed though is that quite a few links on the district pages are broken. I would suggest going through the 47 district pages when you have time and click on the links just to see how many aren't working. Apart from that though, excellent job, keep it up! Timeshift 04:36, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The most common type of broken link I found is where the URL repeats one of it's paths... ie: on http://www.pollbludger.com/sa2006/norwood.htm Hartley links to http://www.pollbludger.com/sa2006/sa2006/hartley.htm which still appears to be there. Timeshift 06:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

RE: IP vandal
If a vandal ignores several last warnings, you can take it to WP:AIV (Administrator intervention against vandalism) where you can report the vandal. More information about how to do this is available on that page. Well done for fighting vandalism - if you want more information about this generally, go to WP:CUV. Wal ton  Vivat Regina!  08:56, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Drag City (drag strip)
A tag has been placed on Drag City (drag strip) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KnightLago (talk) 02:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Latest BludgerTrack has a seat error
Hindmarsh has a 1.9% Lib margin - http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2016/05/05/bludgertrack-50-6-49-4-to-labor-2/ shows a -2.4% LNP swing in SA yet SA seat tally remains unchanged with 6 Lib 5 ALP. Should be 5 Lib 6 ALP. Timeshift (talk) 04:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)