User talk:Williambane91

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002) (April 22)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pindsvin_og_tigerbalsam_(2002) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pindsvin_og_tigerbalsam_(2002) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

User warning
Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Ian Fisher. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:10, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi i believe the subject i was writing about deserves an article, according to Romanian articles he is a well known actor. I don't understand it was hijacking? I'm new to Wikipedia and dont understand what that is, even though I read the links? Did I not create a new page for Ian fisher (actor)
 * Thank you Williambane91 (talk) 09:24, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Is the mistake I did - I did not have the headline as Ian fisher (actor) ? Please give advise I'm very interested in doing things correctly and respect all wikipedias rules. I'm most interested in doing famous singers and actors Wikipedia, and would like to do it the right way! So how do I make the correct page for Ian fisher (actor)
 * Thank you for your help, it's much appreciated 🙏🏻 Williambane91 (talk) 09:29, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book) (May 1) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Hannah_Arendt:_t%C3%A6nkning,_opdragelse_og_dannelse_(book) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hannah_Arendt:_t%C3%A6nkning,_opdragelse_og_dannelse_(book) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi
 * The book is used for educational use in Danish high schools. Therefore the book is subject of instruction at two or more schools!
 * https://www.folkeskolen.dk/paedagogik-undervisning/opdragelse-og-dannelse-filosofisk-set/1809800
 * https://www.information.dk/kultur/anmeldelse/2021/12/hannah-arendt-advarer-imod-goere-boern-helte-hoejere-sags-tjeneste
 * https://www.thiemersmagasin.dk/products/hannah-arendt-og-paedagogikken-9788771243741
 * Williambane91 (talk) 11:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Fine, in that case add to the draft adequate sources corroborating that. Drafts are only reviewed based on the evidence included there. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:15, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help and advise! Much appreciated 🙏🏻 Williambane91 (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002)
Hello, Williambane91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book)
Hello, Williambane91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hannah Arendt: tænkning, opdragelse og dannelse (book), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathrine Kohl (October 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathrine Kohl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kathrine_Kohl Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathrine_Kohl reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 08:38, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jacob the Baker (film) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jacob the Baker (film). Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 09:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kathrine Kohl (October 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kathrine Kohl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kathrine_Kohl Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kathrine_Kohl reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Curb Safe Charmer. I hope this message finds you well. I recently received a notice that the Wikipedia article for Kathrine Kohl was declined based on not meeting the notability criteria. I appreciate your dedication to maintaining the quality of Wikipedia articles, and I would like to respectfully express my disagreement with this decision.
 * The Wikipedia notability guidelines state that notability is determined by what reliable sources say about a subject. It is essential that the subject has been significantly "noted" in independent, reputable sources that are known for their fact-checking and oversight. I believe that the provided sources in the article sufficiently establish Kathrine Kohl's notability.
 * The article now includes additional citations from independent sources such as BT and Jyllandsposten that are some of the biggest newspapers in Denmark. The news articles,
 * highlight Kathrine Kohl's achievements and contributions to the fields of acting and modeling. These sources have a reputation for fact-checking and are independent of the subject, ensuring that the information presented is reliable and unbiased.
 * Furthermore, I have added more links within the article to relevant sources and articles that further emphasize Kathrine Kohl's notability. These links provide readers with easy access to additional information, enhancing the article's comprehensiveness.
 * The article also provides substantial information about Kathrine Kohl's early life, career, and notable works, all of which are supported by verifiable and independent sources.
 * Her contributions to the entertainment industry, along with her recognition and involvement in notable projects such as Jacob the Baker, further underscore her notability.
 * I kindly request a reevaluation of the article based on the reliable sources, verifiable content, and added links provided. I believe that Kathrine Kohl meets the criteria for notability as outlined in Wikipedia's guidelines. If there are specific concerns or suggestions for improvement, I am more than willing to address them to ensure the article meets Wikipedia's standards. Williambane91 (talk) 12:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob the Baker (film) (October 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SlySabre was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob the Baker (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Jacob_the_Baker_(film) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SlySabre&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Jacob_the_Baker_(film) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SlySabre (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Page creation
helpme

I'm currently working on editing Wikipedia articles related to a famous Danish person, and I'd like to ensure that the sources I'm adding adhere to Wikipedia's guidelines. The sources I'm using are from reputable Danish newspapers. However, I want to make sure I'm citing them correctly and providing the necessary information for verification. Could someone with experience in Wikipedia editing assist me in properly formatting and citing these sources in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines? I want to ensure that the articles meet the highest standards and can be published without any issues.

The Wikipedia notability guidelines state that notability is determined by what reliable sources say about a subject. It is essential that the subject has been significantly "noted" in independent, reputable sources that are known for their fact-checking and oversight. I believe that the provided sources in the article sufficiently establish Kathrine Kohl's notability.

The page now includes additional citations from independent sources such as BT and Jyllandsposten that are some of the biggest newspapers in Denmark. The news articles, highlight Kathrine Kohl's achievements and contributions to the fields of acting and modeling. These sources have a reputation for fact-checking and are independent of the subject, ensuring that the information presented is reliable and unbiased.

Furthermore, I have added more links within the article to relevant sources and articles that further emphasize Kathrine Kohl's notability.

Thank you in advance for your help! Williambane91 (talk) 19:55, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Page creation.
help me

I noticed that my recent Wikipedia article on [kathrine Kohl] was rejected due to concerns about their notability. I respectfully disagree with this decision and have taken steps to provide additional sources and evidence of her notability. I have updated the article with references from reputable sources and believe that [kathrine kohl] meets Wikipedia's notability criteria. These sources include jyllandsposten, BT.

Help adding these sources correct https://italiancomedyfestival.com/kathrine-kohl/

https://www.guldogure.dk/assets/dus2016_5.pdf

I want to make sure I'm citing them correctly and providing the necessary information for verification. Could someone with experience in Wikipedia editing assist me in properly formatting and citing these sources in accordance with Wikipedia's guidelines? I want to ensure that the articles meet the highest standards and can be published without any issues. Williambane91 (talk) 20:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The draft was declined, not rejected. "Rejected" has a specific meaning in the draft submission process- that a draft may not be resubmitted.  Declined means a draft may be resubmitted, as you already have. Please name the specific notability criteria this person meets. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm turning off these help templates. If you want help understanding the review criteria, ask at the WP:AFCHD.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 21:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your reply I appreciate all the help and guidance from talented wiki members as you.
 * "Kathrine Kohl meets the notability criteria on Wikipedia based on the following:
 * 1. **Significant Coverage in Reliable Sources**: Kathrine Kohl has received significant coverage in reputable Danish newspapers such as [BT, JP, gulogure, Italian comedy festival]. These sources provide in-depth coverage of her work as a model, actress, and film producer.
 * 2. **International Recognition**: She is recognized internationally as a sought-after photo model, which is supported by her participation in major advertising campaigns in the USA alongside prominent figures such as Gal Gadot and Denise Richards. She has been the cover model several times for gulogure
 * Notable Film Roles: Jacob the Baker, distributed by CAA showcasing her versatility as an actress. Senior Entourage, Pindsvin og tigerbalsam, where her performance received critical acclaim for her portraying a girl with diabetes.
 * Television Appearances: In addition to her film work, Kathrine has made memorable appearances on television. She appeared in music videos by famous artist ToManyLeftHands- trouble - commercial with Brian Austin green- OROGOLD - music video the blue van - Devine -, OROGOLD with Gal gadot
 * These aspects collectively establish her notability as a multi-talented individual with a noteworthy career in the fields of modeling, acting and film production
 * Williambane91 (talk) 21:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I am still not seeing WP:GNG or WP:NCREATIVE being met. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Pindsvin og tigerbalsam (2002)


Hello, Williambane91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pindsvin og tigerbalsam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:53, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

 * Hello, Williambane91,
 * If you have questions about article creation or Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it is much better to bring them to the Teahouse. You post a question on your own talk page, no one will see it because few editors have this page on their Watchlists. It's better to bring your questions to a forum where there are editors who are waiting to address any problems that come up for new editors. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jacob the Baker (film)
Hello, Williambane91. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jacob the Baker (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kathrine Kohl


Hello, Williambane91. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kathrine Kohl".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  14:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)