User talk:Williamborg/archive2

Older discussions archived here. Everything except vandalizm will be saved.

Region?
We need to review the terms used for various types of regions of Norway, esp. the current erroneous term "landscape", but also landsdel and tettsted. See for instance Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Norway. -- Egil 16:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Agree. Would appreciate if you’d take the lead on proposing the approach. I’m of a rather retiring personality who finds some of the debates one must go through in the group dynamics of a Wiki sap my energy. It has taken me a while just to come back to Wiki – and I need to focus on making some contributions in uncontroversial areas for a while. Thanks! Williamborg 21:46, 14 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Nice job done by Egil! Since this is history, I'm moving it to there on the 24th. Williamborg 03:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Page Blanking
On 24-Jan, you blanked Sogndalen. Blanking pages is generally considered a bad idea. In cases of creating an article under a misspelling, it's better to redirect the misspelling to the correct article. You are probably not the only one who will make that spelling mistake. I've redirected this article to Songdalen. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 01:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree. More extensive response at JLaTondre's page. Williamborg 03:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I provided a link to the directions in my first post. They are at Redirect. If you still have questions, let me know. -- JLaTondre 13:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yep, you did. Thanks! Williamborg

Norweigan county maps
Thank you for the kind comments on the maps. I am doing a major project at work - drilling down each country to the 1st, 2nd, even 3rd administrative level, and updating a huge database (english names, local names, the works). When I got to the Wiki section on Norway, I noticed that there were so many counties without maps as a guide, so I wanted to help contribute to the articles. I appreciate all of the comments - and I will strive to improve the coastline detail (mine came from a database that was not quite focused on detail) and the alpha ordering in the future (I noticed how Norweigans actually alphabetize the Ø and å characters differently, so I want to improve the maps so the lists are in Norge alpha-order). I am open for doing district maps - the big thing will be the need for source data for me to use, no matter what language (as long as I can decipher the borders). Rarelibra 00:37 27JAN2006
 * You're quite welcome for the kind comment; it was sincere. Since the Wikipedia is a voluntary thing, I appreciate the work of folks like you who concentrate on improving basic information.  And as a visual person, I really value maps.
 * As a possible aid for your effort, I would recommend the German site at German map of Aust-Agder or Veiatlas Norge as possible sources. From the German site you can transfer to other counties of Norway as well. Or if you can’t get access, I’d be happy to print as a pdf & email to your. And if you’d like to post DRAFT versions on your talk page, I’m sure several of our active Norway contributors would be happy to review and comment. Williamborg 22:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Renaming districts
It's entirely possible that I haven't paid attention, but can you point me to the discussion about using the indefinite form for such places as Gudbrandsdalen? --Leifern 22:15, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No, I'm guilty of "going off half-cocked". Added a section titled Gudbrandsdal or Gudbrandsdalen to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Norway. In summary, I suggest we simply use the form on the Districts of Norway page to document our consensus usage. But, as always, i'm willing to be convinced it there is a better solution. Williamborg 02:21, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Fjord
Thanks. It just seemed to be getting unwieldy. By the way, I'm not sure I agree with how glacial origin is optional in your revision of our definition of fjord. I will try to prompt some discussion of this on the article's talk page. -- Avenue 10:38, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Noted. I'll discuss on the fjord talk page. Williamborg 13:54, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

A long time ago...
..we discussed the Vang church. And I told you I was sure it was the wrong Vang church? The right one is on the left side and the correct is on the right side. Uh.. The one on the right is whats left of my brain.. — John Erling Blad (no) 23:39, 23 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Probably why sailors use port and starboard.
 * Rather an interesting right church to port (although not as interesting in architecture as the 'wrong' one to starboard). Do we know when it was built and whether is has an interesting history? Williamborg 03:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * There are pretty decant litterature on most of the norwegian churches. Problem is, it is so many of them so it is necessary to limit the number to describe. And if you remove some of them from a list of interesting churches, other people adds them back in. Often without realizing the reason why they was removed in the first place. "Interesting enough to describe" often turns out to be read like "church in my neighbourhood". — John Erling Blad (no) 20:28, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Subpages
I noticed you have User_talk:Williamborg-1 and User_talk:Williamborg-2. This isn't the proper way to create subpages - those are the user pages for the (presumably non-existent) accounts User:Williamborg-1 and User:Williamborg-2. Subpages of your userspace would be something like User:Williamborg/subpage or User talk:Williamborg/archive. These are part of your user space and connect with it. You should move your subpages back into your own user space (click on the [move] button at the top of the page) and then tag the old pages for speedy deletion - otherwise someone registering User:Williamborg-1 might be very confused ;)

If you need any help or clarification, please feel free to ask me for help. Guettarda 18:36, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Excellent. Now I understand how it is done. Thanks - Williamborg 14:09, 3 March 2006 (UTC)

History of Jämtland
You have edited the text on Jamtlandic such that it now says:


 * "Jämtland was originally settled by fugitives from Trøndelag after Harald Fairhair united Norway in the 9th century, became part of Norway during the reign of Haakon I in the 10th century and remained part of Norway until the 17th century."
 * (Claimed source: Gjerset, Knut (1915). History of the Norwegian People, Volumes I & II, The MacMillan Company.)

Correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't history say that king Sverrir conquered Jämtland in 1178? How can he have conquered Jämtland if it already was a part of Norway? No, Jämtland had been an independent nation ever since 9th century when the trönds colonised the area, though being allied with Norway or Sweden at different periods throughout Viking age depending on what they found most appropriate.

BTW, I'll completely re-write the article on Jamtlandic so there's no point in adding stuff. I'll probably remove the history part completely, since it is quite likely that the theory of a tröndish migration to Jämtland is not very relevant (the migration probably consisted of some few households setling near people who they were acquainted with since generations), though the connection to Tröndelag is important.

Jens Persson jepe2503 [at] hotmail [dot] com (130.242.128.85 19:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC))

Norwegian geography articles
hi williamborg. i see youve been making a lot of articles about norwegian geography. did you know that you can use norway-geo-stub rather than geo-stub on them? :)  BL Lacertae -  kiss the lizard  06:11, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Nope... Williamborg 15:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Re: Population centres in Lunner
I see your point. Although there are other population centres in Lunner, such as Grindvoll and Oppdalen, they may not be as cemented and formalised as the rest. I guess I just wanted the sentence to read better. Alter/revert/change or delete at will! --Grumpy444grumpy 15:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Actually just checking to make sure you meant what you wrote. You did. Looks good to me. Takk - Williamborg 21:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Den vakre
"The term «den vakre» exceeds both my Norwegian vocabulary and my dictionaries. The name Frier comes from the old Norse and means «den vakre» or the watchman? Any help would be appreciated. Williamborg 23:27, 11 March 2006 (UTC)"
 * Not quite sure what you mean. What is the context? --Grumpy444grumpy 19:40, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I cannot for the life of me understand what the word "Frier" has to do with "den vakre". As your dictionary will tell you the word "frier" means something like "suitor" or "wooer", but I think this is a relatively modern word. I was thinking, though, if it is Norse, could it have anything to do with either of the gods Frey, Freya or Frigg? Just a thought. --Grumpy444grumpy 21:35, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I have checked out Oluf Rygh's book on placenames in Norway, and it turns out that the Norse adjective fríðr means free, lovely or beautiful. Problem solved? --Grumpy444grumpy 09:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Solved! and a fríðr solution at that! Thanks - Williamborg 16:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Drive for Swedish quality articles
Hello. This is in regards to the upcoming Wikipedia improvements Pushing to 1.0 and Stable versions, which have the intentions to provide stable versions of articles suitable for prints or publishing.

I've noticed you have written several articles about Swedish matters. If you feel some of these are decent enough to deserve recognition, you are encouraged to nominate them at Swedish Wikipedians' notice board/Swedish quality articles. In the end, our articles should be comparable to what is expected from the Encyclopedia Britannica. If it currently isn't, but you feel you have spent a considerable amount of time on it, you are still encouraged to nominate it, so that your work will be recognized and others can continue to improve on it. Don't be shy! :-)

Fred-Chess 11:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Most kind of you to suggest. But my focus has been on completeness (i.e., filling in the obvious gaps) rather than driving articles to full publication quality. I'll look over some of them to see if any are good enough for prime time - but am pretty sure I'll nominate few. Thanks - Williamborg 16:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Valdres Folkemuseum
I need someone to check out my english spelling in the addition to the article about Valdres Folkemuseum. Hopefully I found the right buildings! — John Erling Blad (no) 20:29, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Seter_2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Seter_2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:43, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Updated to include information not required when originally uploaded (or perhaps left off in my ignorance). Williamborg 01:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Greensted Church
I found a question on User talk:Wiglafs discussion page about this church, added by you. The correct reading of "and it is often classified as a stave church" is more like "and the palisade walls are often classified as remnants of a stave church". This to is wrong if you use a Norwegian description of a stave church. It is although right if you use a Swedish definition of a stave church.

The background is, in Sweden a stave church is a church with standing planks in the wall while in Norway a stave church is specific construction with standing staves (pillars) on top of a wooden frame. Sometimes scholars in Sweden uses risverkskyrka to avoid the confusion. In all there are three different constructions, probably with a lot of transitional forms. A palisade construction, a construction with earth bound posts and a construction with posts on top of a wooden frame. To make the situation even more unclear a palisade construction can be partly lifted from the ground and set on a wooden frame.

Especially churches with earth bound posts can be easily spotted during an archaeological survey and a palisade construction were all or parts of the walls are set in gravel. Such buildings are detected all over Europe, and according to Leif Anker "Europe are covered in post holes from Italy to Norway". As he says, "it is more interesting to investigate why the stave churches survived in Norway then to try to see them as a Norwegian-only phenomenon".

— John Erling Blad (no) 10:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Excellent discussion. Might I suggest it be added to the Greensted Church and stave church pages? Williamborg 15:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I think parts of the stave church article need a reorganization as it tries to describes to many concepts. Right now the Norwegian article both describes a stave church, a post church, palisade techniques, historical foundation, restoration, iconography, etc. At least there should be articles about wooden houses in northern europe with construction techniques for the various types. Then there should be an article about the findings of such buildings all over Europe, probably also with linking to iconography and tales from the various areas. The main problem with this is that parts of english Wikipedia seems to be more focused on the interpretation of the tales, iconography and buildings in a national romantic context then in a scientific context. — John Erling Blad (no) 00:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Agree that there is a tendency toward the national romantic - probably the result of having folks like me editing. I have to make a conscious effort to view things differently than as my grandmother described them - and that is sometimes hard. Williamborg 01:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't think your edits are a problem at all! :D
 * There are a couple of other articles. One is Palisade church the other is Hemse stave church. The later is an translation I've only initiated to avoid a red link. The interesting thing is that this church which is close to the most extraordinary such finding in Sweden isn't at display for the moment. I'll translate the Norwegian article unless you or someone else wants to do it. — John Erling Blad (no) 02:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Am currently working on Vestfronten på Nidarosdomen plus trying to work through the Buskerud municipalities, so I’ll defer to you on Hemse stave church, but I can see the Norwegian article is worth translating. I’ll watch for it. Williamborg 03:00, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Ah, Buskerud.. I'll see if I can take a tour and make some snapshots. Its just a little awkward way home. And I can take photos of some chuches along the road. — John Erling Blad (no) 03:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I'll watch for more of your excellent pictures... Williamborg 02:47, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:Trondheim elgeseterbru 1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Trondheim elgeseterbru 1.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.
 * See Image_use_policy. Images licensed only for use on Wikipedia are not acceptable. It should probably not be on the Norwegian Wikipedia either. -Nv8200p talk 15:16, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Blåfjella-Skjækerfjella
I reverted your change from no:Blåfjella-Skjækerfjella nasjonalpark Interwiki there, assuming it was an error. Egil 05:09, 31 March 2006 (UTC)


 * You are correct - wrong article changed. Williamborg 05:14, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

no:Wikipedia:Wiki for trygd
An article for translation? :D — John Erling Blad (no) 06:12, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate
I made an article for the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (Norges vassdrags- og energidirektorat) so that Norwegian lakes pages don't need to use a no: interwiki link when talking about the NVE any more. (It's actually less stubby than the Norwegian article, somewhat surprisingly!) Since you created the excellent List of lakes in Norway, I wondered if you knew where on the internet their lakes database is stored? An address would make it possible to accurately reference a lot of Norwegian lake articles.

On a similar topic, do you think it would be worth moving the discussion about different types/names of "lake" in Norway currently on the category page at Category:Lakes of Norway (explaining e.g. why Randsfjorden is called a fjord even though it's not a salt water inlet) into the list of Norwegian lakes? It seems more sensible to have it in article space somewhere, and that would seem to be the best place to put it. TheGrappler 01:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Out of the country for a week. Internet access a little sketchy. Will find site once back home. Williamborg 01:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Went ahead and made the change you recommended (amazing what you can convince me of when you are so courteous and complimentary) - in this case it was John Erling Blad's excellent work that I just quoted - but it was still thoughtful of you. Williamborg 02:07, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I realised that some of the lake names are actually Sami in origin, so I've added (and referenced, once I got my head around - took me ages to remember to put . If you have not already done so please also include the source of the image; in most cases the website where you found it.

Please signify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 15:10, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * In former days I transferred a number of "rights reserved" from teh Norwegian Wikipedia while translating their pages; they were then permitted by Wikipolicy. Things have become more disciplined. Since the original of  Image:``Buarbreen i Odda.JPG had rights reserved, it was removed from the Norwegian Wikipedia.  And so it must be removed on the English Wikipedia. C'est La Vie'' Williamborg (Bill)

My RfA
Just wanted to send a quick note of thanks for your support in my RfA. :-) I really appreciate it! Best, Irongargoyle 17:25, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Your monobook.js
In this edit, you have added code that render the page appear in the WP:CSD, I think you may want to fix the code. --WinHunter (talk) 11:53, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
 * From my little knowledge of coding I think it is this line (the  ❌  part especially): if(edsum.indexOf('')!=-1) return 'sp'; //override group de below causing the page to appear in speedy. --WinHunter (talk) 14:19, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

RfB With A Smile :)
