User talk:Williambrighenti

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Inventory Price Index Computation (IPIC) Method


A tag has been placed on Inventory Price Index Computation (IPIC) Method, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Inventory Price Index Computation (IPIC) Method and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 03:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)


 * yes, you wrote, it, yes, its not copyvio, but it seems entirely devoted to promoting your services. Unless you can find references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, and write in such a way as not to look like an advertisement, it has no place on Wikipedia, & I've deleted it.     Please see  our FAQ  about businesses, other organisations, and articles like this.     DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Ordinary and Necessary Expenses
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ordinary and Necessary Expenses, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Ordinary and Necessary Expenses appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ordinary and Necessary Expenses has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 07:14, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I note that you are cpa-connecticut.com. Even if you do not link to your, website, any article from you will be viewed with suspicion as veiled spam. But in any case, the two articles you have submitted were likely to be rejected as being how-to guides and of interest in only one country. You said in September "I will not visit Wikipedia again". That was a good idea. Why did you change your mind? But if you stay, I suggest you work on improving existing articles about taxation. &mdash; RHaworth  09:15, 13 December 2009 (UTC)