User talk:Williamelyse

Edit to Darin LaHood
Is there a reason you removed the portrait in Darin LaHood? You didn't indicate in your edit or in the tlak page so I reverted it.

--KNHaw (talk) 18:25, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm TAnthony. I noticed that you recently removed content from John Shimkus without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — TAnthonyTalk 18:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Kinzinger, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 18:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Randy Hultgren, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — TAnthonyTalk 18:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Illinois' congressional districts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''OK. It's obvious you're systematically removing portraits of Republican representatives. Stop it. Otherwise you're going to be banned as a vandal only account.'' KNHaw (talk)  18:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Mike Bost. — TAnthonyTalk 18:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Roskam. — TAnthonyTalk 18:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Rodney Davis (politician). — TAnthonyTalk 18:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Illinois' congressional districts, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — TAnthonyTalk 18:32, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * You may think "They're only photos", but explained removal of content with the intent of being disruptive is still vandalism. Oh, and this is super mature also. I can only assume you're a bored high school student, it would be great if you could contribute to Wikipedia productively, the participation would be appreciated. Thanks.— TAnthonyTalk 20:59, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. — Maile (talk) 21:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)