User talk:Williamwells


 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style
 * Glossary
 * What Wikipedia is not
 * Assume good faith
 * Wikiquette
 * Sandbox (this page is for testing)

Your contributions
Dear Mr Wells,

I was interested to read your comments on circumcision. I thought they were quite reasonable. Unfortunately, a few users are adept at using policies such as 'neutral point of view' and 'no original research' as weapons in their culture war on behalf of their favourite cause. However, I can assure you that these people are just as liable as others to depart from the policies that they try to enforce on others. So their language, in turn, can be revised to ensure that the elusive 'neutral point of view' will be more closely adhered to. Michael Glass 02:07, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Shaggybevo
Please don't repost unless you can show in the article that the site meets the notability standards of WP:WEB. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 03:21, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Again, we don't post articles that are merely links to off-Wikipedia websites. Do not repost unless you are willing to take the time to create an article that meets WP:WEB and cites reliable sources per WP:V. Simply mouthing slogans like "we will not be censored" is a good way to get yourself blocked. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Williamwells for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Geez thats a laugh, just because a second of thousands of users stopped to try to lend a hand in editing an entry for this significant online presence, you stoop to accusing me of "sockpuppetry" - hard to do since I have been a member here for many years.

I am simply trying to make an entry for a fansite, one that is already referenced in an existing page for HornFans. I tried to make a more extensive reference in that page, then link it to its own entry, and between the two you deleted my entry.

I am not so fast as to be able to save everything locally each time I do this, so you are simply censoring my work. Give me a reasonable amount of time and I will create all links and provide the requisite substantiation for the entry. It will be included in the entry itself. I am not an anonymous puppet, relax, I really exitst, this entry is legitimate, and I will provide the required proof of this. Just give a guy a little time to edit please?? See the site yourself at www.shaggybevo.com, its not a joke, there are THOUSANDS of users and it has been in existence for many years. Dont take this personally, just give me a reasonable amount of time to properly make the entry.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 07:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shaggy Bevo
A tag has been placed on Shaggy Bevo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  ttonyb (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Shaggy Bevo
I have nominated Shaggy Bevo, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Shaggy Bevo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:34, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 18:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Now is your time.
You claim this a notable subject, great. The afd discussion allows our community at large to debate it's inclusion by our standards. It also gets you a bit more time to get things in order as far as your sources. I understand you feel it is very notable but thus far nothing has show as far as wp:rs goes to include it. I'm only one person though. More will comment Hell In A Bucket (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm Bagumba. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Kevin Durant. Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal Wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 00:45, 4 March 2014 (UTC)