User talk:Willietell/Archives/

Archived talk
Guidelines WP:ARCHIVE doesn't give a date for last revision guideline, so I took a look at archiving bots. None of them had timelines except for User:MiszaBot/Archive_HowTo which appears to run on a 31-day cycle by default. Since that talk hadn't been edited in 29 days when I archived it (nor since), it seems like this is a reasonable length for archival. If no one's said anything for a month, conversation is dead. If anyone wants to pick up, he can link to the archived talk and start anew or copy/past his own comments. I don't see unarchiving as being necessary or desirable. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:31, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I understand your reasoning, its just that, considering the subject, input to threads sometimes carries on for extended periods, and 30 days is rather short for the topic. Still I guess its not a major thing.  Will it automatically archive the talk page or was this a one time thing? Willietell (talk) 03:38, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Archiving I did it manually--it's not automatic. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:18, 12 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello Willietell, you could try automatic archiving via bots. I use this one . There is a documentation on that as well. It is working. goodbye. ♥ --FaktneviM (talk) 09:36, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Civility warning
I take great exception to your comments about me on the talk page. There is no "collusion" between me and any of the other editors on that article or any other. The article is simply on my watchlist because at one point or another, I got involved in a discussion about the blood transfusion section (professional interest, and I have long been an editor on science and reliagion articles). Nobody recruited or canvassed me. If I revert you, it's because I sincerely think you're 1) edit-warring against consensus; 2) misinterpreting sources; or 3) factually incorrect, as you were with your concept of "rendering". I do the same for any other editor who acts similarly. If everybody is against you, you should consider the possibility that you just might be wrong, instead of dreaming up silly conspiracy theories and attacking the integrity of your fellow editors. Please apologize on talk page. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 07:12, 12 May 2012 (UTC)