User talk:Willkirton/sandbox

William, I decided to review what you have for your revisions so far. Jbergmann5 (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Hedge Article Revisions Review
I think I agree with pretty much everything you had to add to the article on Hedge. It is one of the main tasks that we are covering for our page as well, as I think a lot of the smaller articles suffer for not having better organization. I think that once you go deeper into what Hedges are, you can better separate and organize the article based on how they are being used. One thing that I would like to see added myself is either a link to the page cooperative principle at the bottom, or have the mentions of "maxim of quality", "maxim of quantity", etc hyperlinked to their explanations on that page. I think that even if you don't change the wording of the explanations of the examples, as it sounds like you want to do, that by providing them with easy links to other wikipedia pages they are able to look and see what exactly that means. I think examples from other languages would be good as well, but I would be careful of biting off more than you can chew. Just the organization alone seems like it would take quite a bit of work. That being said, it would add to the article still, so if it doesn't end up being too much work, by all means!

Response to Peer Review
Hey Joshua! Thanks for choosing my article and contributions to peer review. I appreciate the extra input! I think what you said about adding link to the page for the cooperative principle may be really valuable, and maybe even adding how hedges aide in adhering to the cooperative principle. I did find some great examples of hedges in other languages so I feel eager to jump into that haha, but you're totally right about not biting off more than I can chew with this one. I'll keep all the things you mentioned in mind as I continue to draft my article. Thanks again! Jbergmann5 Willkirton (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)