User talk:Willll4

November 2015
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Rotherham United F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rotherham United F.C., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Gricehead (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lee Camp (footballer). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:36, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=710840350 your edit] to Rotherham United F.C. may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Third tier of English football ( Football League One since 2004)
 * Fourth tier of English football ( Football League Two since 2004)

Rotherham United Club Honours
Hi,

I noticed you repeatedly re-adding content to Rotherham United F.C. under the honours section. It has been agreed by consensus at the Wikipedia Football project That 3rd place finishes (even when they are club records) are not honours. You can see the definition of honours at: WikiProject Football/Clubs. Please do not re-add this information without seeking and obtaining an updated consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 22:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Whiston Wildcats


A tag has been placed on Whiston Wildcats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Logical Fuzz (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Rotherham United F.C.‎
I've reverted your addition to the lead of Rotherham United F.C.‎. I'm afraid you can't use a page of raw statistics as a source, construct a fact from them, and then base an opinion on it. That's original research. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:48, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Mirrors as sources
Hi - the source you recently added at Rotherham United F.C. for the Division Three North Cup win was a wiki mirror site. These cannot be used as Reliable Sources (see WP:MIRROR for more details). I have managed to find a different source to use, so that the content can stay. Cheers, Gricehead (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rotherham United F.C. with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:08, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Welsh Premier League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paul Harrison. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of english football clubs who have never graced the top flight for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of english football clubs who have never graced the top flight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of english football clubs who have never graced the top flight until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:56, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
JMHamo (talk) 07:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 12:27, 23 May 2016 (UTC)