User talk:Willthacheerleader18/Archive 1

Request for page deletion
I am representing the person who this page is about and the person wants to delete this page as it is damanging their reputation. I am requesting as you are the creator of this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alanoud_bint_Hamad_Al_Thani — Preceding unsigned comment added by Secondangel (talk • contribs) 08:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
 * How is this article "damaging" to "their reputation"? The article is well sourced with proper citations from major business journals and news outlets, which is where the information came from. Have you contacted those media outlets to inform them that their reporting was wrong? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:18, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

References to LDS Church name change reverted
Please provide context why you removed the name change I applied to the Saint Peter page. The name of the church referenced is the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. According to their public style guide, references to them as the LDS Church are incorrect. Also references to their members as Mormons are also discouraged. Here is the public style guide. https://www.mormonnewsroom.org/style-guide. Changes occurred on this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Peter. Revision number 874115708

Thank you for your help

Travismurdock (talk) 06:58, 17 December 2018 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia is an independent encyclopedia. Our concern is factual information, not pleasing institutions. However, you will see that the edits I made did not refer to them as LDS Church but Latter-day Saints. As for "Mormons" being discourage, I recommend reading Mormons, which states that members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are encouraged not to refer to themselves as Mormons, but gives no teaching on what those outside the Church are supposed to do. Mormonism also encompasses other bodies outside of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

Pontifical medal
I want to know the reason why you removed my edit. DizzinessOfFreedom (talk) 03:32, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * As I said, Breitbart is not recognized as a credible source. It also gave incorrect information. She was awarded a Pontifical Knighthood, being made a Dame Commander of the Order of St. Gregory and the award was not given to her in connection to her work for women's reproductive rights, but for her work as a government official. She happens to support abortion, which may have caused controversy, but that is not the same claim. If there is/was controversy regarding her award, this needs to be cited with credible references that are not from a political opinion and commentary website. As far as categories such as "Liberal theologians" and "Anti-Modernism" goes, those are orphaned categories. They are not connected to any other categories on Wikipedia. Furthermore, they are too vague. What is "liberal"? It has different definitions depending on the context, and who decides what a "liberal" theologian is? "Anti-Modernism" has the same issue. It's too vague. Is it Anti-Modernism in the Catholic Church? In Christianity? In visual art? In architecture? It's not specific and does not improve the quality of the article. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:39, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

It did not say in the article that the medal was given to her because she was an a pro abortion activist, but that it was given to a pro abortion activist. I cited another source. DizzinessOfFreedom (talk) 03:45, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Lilianne Ploumen is a Dutch politician who has done activism work regarding women's reproductive health. She is not notable because of her activism. There was no mention as to why the award was given or who she is, other than a "abortion rights activist". This implies bias. Catholic News Agency is a reliable source, but you didn't use the article to explain the backstory or the reason for the award, which would clarify the incident's supposed controversy:

"Responding to requests of clarification, Paloma Garcia-Ovejero, deputy director of the Holy See Press Office, said that “the honorific of the St. Gregory the Great Pontifical Order that Liliane Ploumen, then Minister for Development received in June 2017, during the visit of the Dutch Royals to the Holy Father, is part of the diplomatic praxis of the exchange of decorations among delegations during official visits between heads of state and government to the Vatican.”

It explains why/how such honours are given and that they are not endorsements and have no connection to any activism or pro-abortion policies Ploumen was behind. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:49, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

The source of Bishop Fellay calling him a modernist is in the article. It wasnt in the edition summary. You need to look first before making such claims. DizzinessOfFreedom (talk) 03:36, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
 * See above comment. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:39, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

IDB
Hi there. You've been adding a lot of International Debutante Ball entries to articles where, as far as I can see, they have no place being. I've reverted the adds on articles that I was previously involved with, but thought I should ask you what your position was before I reviewed the others. Cheers, Bromley86 (talk) 01:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I think, as long as we maintain their names on the article for the IDB, it is okay to remove it from their individual articles.--Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:05, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ebenezer Lutheran Church (Greensboro, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ebenezer Lutheran Church (Greensboro, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ebenezer Lutheran Church (Greensboro, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ssт✈(discuss) 14:41, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Lewisfield Plantation
I looked at your reference, http://wbtw.com/2014/02/04/get-ready-for-another-sc-reality-show-southern-charm/. The reference doesn't mention Katherine Dennis, Rembert Dennis, or Lewisfield Plantation. Wrong reference? Generic1139 (talk) 05:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed reference, thanks! --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Prince Philip
As was explained before on this article, you do not need to convert to be received into the Anglican church. You just turn up at the service and join in. It is not the same as more Catholic Christian denominations. DrKay (talk) 16:35, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * As I explained, that is not the case. People can and do convert to the Anglican Church from other denominations, as seen by many categories established on wikipedia. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You can self-identify as a convert, but you do not have to officially convert. That is the point. DrKay (talk) 06:45, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. You have performed four reverts within 24 hours on a biography of a living person. DrKay (talk) 16:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cozart-Coley House
Hello Willthacheerleader18,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cozart-Coley House for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  ~Mohammad Hossain~  03:15, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Re: Bronx Academy of Arts and Dance
Thank you for starting this article. I hope you don't mind, but I added the article to Wiki Loves Pride 2016/Results, which tracks new and improved LGBT-related content as part of an ongoing Wiki Loves Pride campaign. If you create or improve other LGBT articles between now and the end of June, feel free to update this page with your contributions. Thanks again! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:20, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Order of the Dannebrog
Hello Willthacheerleader18,

I was wondering if you could help me figure out some particulars concerning the Danish honour system, Order of the Dannebrog. According to its Wikipedia page, the class "Grand Commander" is reserved to "persons of princely origin", namely "Royals with close family ties with the Danish Royal House." However, I've found a source for the Danish vice admiral A. H. Vedel that lists him as a "Knight Grand Commander." I have not found anything explaining such a title. Could you help me research this end? It's possible the the actually title Vedel held was simply lost in translation by the producer of the source. Thank you for hearing me out! Indy beetle (talk) 08:29, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to the African Destubathon
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. I couldn't help but notice that you appear to be going through articles about US towns to see if they mention the name of the person they are named after, then you're adding the name to the infobox. The problem is, often the name listed in the article is unsourced, and could be incorrect. I reverted your edits to Hillsborough, North Carolina and Zebulon, North Carolina. Before continuing, could I suggest you go back and check all the edits you've made to be sure they are in fact correct and properly sourced? Thanks a lot. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * The information I added to the infobox was already sourced in the article, but per your request I have copied the (already provided) links and used them again as references in the infobox. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:44, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ballet Zürich
Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Willthacheerleader18, thanks for creating Ballet Zürich!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It could use a few more footnotes in the history section. Otherwise nice work!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.  Rob van  vee  13:44, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Delta Chi Xi
I see that you reverted my change to the infobox on the Delta Chi Xi page. The reason that I removed them is that an entry with a free label will not be properly displayed if there is not a label to go with it. So if a free_label value is added to indicate what those three things are, I'm just fine with it.Naraht (talk) 20:30, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

House of Cavendish
Hi I saw that you reverted my edit. The use of "House of" is exclusively reserved for Royal dynasties in English. I am in the middle of correcting a certain number of pages including the Cavendish family. Please read House of for more information. The term "House of" has unfortunately been made popular by the series game of Thrones. On my mother's side the family is descended from a certain number of aristocratic families and none use the term "House of". Once I have managed to move the Cavendish family page to its correct title I will correct this page. --Domdeparis (talk) 09:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indermaur, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tyrol and Mauer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to take a look at our first article
Hi! We are students writing an article on Tiler Peck as part of our class Academic Discourse and Writing at Tec de Monterrey. Since you are an experienced Wikipedian and have interest in these kinds of topics, we would like you to know if you could take a few moments to take a look at the article and give us feedback. Thank you for your time. --Fernanda Nova Rodarte (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to! Thank you for asking me. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 05:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians user group
I thought you might be interested in participating in the North Carolina Triangle Wikipedians user group. You can sign up here!--Pharos (talk) 21:54, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * In der Maur (family)
 * added a link pointing to Austrian


 * Pope Tawadros II of Alexandria
 * added a link pointing to Islamic State

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbo von Waxenstein (family), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sassona Norton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!
RachelWex 19:36, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Ansitz Nussdorf) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Ansitz Nussdorf, Willthacheerleader18!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Photo and map location would be nice..."

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Reversion of edit on Hope Cooke entry
You have not provided an explanation for your compete reversion of my edit of the Hope Cooke article. It would be polite and helpful for you to do so.

Tullyvallin (talk) 00:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Tullyvallin
 * You added information that was not cited nor was it encyclopedial. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 04:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Colbert family has been nominated for discussion
Category:Colbert family, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk) 18:28, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Prince Constantine-Alexios of Greece and Denmark
Hello Willthacheerleader18,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Prince Constantine-Alexios of Greece and Denmark for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Diako « Talk » 16:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Greensboro massacre
Hello Willthacheerleadrer18,

Regarding your recent edit at Greensboro massacre. Thought you might wish to see a discussion involving that subject. It took place on my Talk page, so it's unlikely you would know that it was being discussed. -

Per your revert, stating that I "want to develop the idea that white juries inherently favor Nazis and the Klan" is a mistaken view on your part... just like I might be mistaken to say that you are attempting to whitewash the article. -Location (talk) 22:15, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I assume good intentions on your part, which is why I said IF you wanted to develop that line of reasoning, it should be done in the body of the text. I do not assume good intentions on the part of the Chicago newspaper writer. He went out of his way to try to paint the jury decision (if not also the jury members) as racist. It is an inflammatory bit of writing. More yellow journalism than professional journalism. But you were only citing words from the article, which is quite fair in our world. But it does misrepresent the events. The "journalist" had only one reason to mention an all-white jury... to infer some form of racial prejudice. The article was rife with that innuendo, but came up short when it came to supporting facts. Both the jurors and the prosecutor who carried the case for the State support the contention that politics was the deciding factor. If you wanted to say that a Southern jury decided against communists, I think you would be on solid ground, with a good bit of supporting evidence. But all-white...? Why? Gulbenk (talk) 23:40, 10 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your thoughtful response. I re-read the Chicago Tribune article more carefully and while I don't believe it to be be yellow journalism, it is clearly an opinion piece and you are correct that it should not be cited the way I placed it in the article. (I did not notice the first time about that it was in the "Perspective" section.) It looks like Charles Madigan, who typically does have a left-of-center POV, thought that the jury should have decided the case differently and he drew attention to the view that many blacks - in context with other contemporary cases - viewed the system of justice as racist. And you are correct that the unnamed author for The New York Times used described the jury that way without any context leaving the reader in infer something from innuendo. I imagine a lot could be written on the various POVs regarding the jury and the verdit (e.g. it does appear as though jury may have disliked communists more than any like or dislike for the Klan). Anyway, my apologies. -Location (talk) 02:39, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

--  Willthacheerleader18,  If you have a different point of view, I would like to understand it. Gulbenk (talk) 01:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Carolina Thunderbirds
The reason I reverted your edits are 1)a very low level minor league hockey team's cheerleaders are not notable for the introduction (the team has not played yet, hence the lack of a body) and 2)your source is an dance class website that makes no mention of the cheer squad. The Thunderbirds' own website makes no mention of a cheer squad so I see no reason for it to be included here, even if you citation was better. (It would also be odd for as even most NHL/AHL/ECHL teams do not have a cheer team, they typically have "ice girls" which can be a dance team but often just come out at intermissions and sweep the ice and interact with fans.) I should also note that based on your edit content, region-based edits, and user name, if you have any affiliation with the organizations you are editing, you absolutely MUST read WP:COI. Yosemiter (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I did not contest your removel the second time, so I see no reason for this post. The website I used did indeed reference the team. However, I understand that it is not considered notable enough for an article. My username is from when I created this account over seven years ago. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Usually if I remove info twice, I try to explain why per WP:BRD, so this post was as much for me as it was for you. The source/dance class website had one mention for the Thunderbirds, but as I said, there was nothing there about the squad. A news article or a team article about the cheerleaders would have been better. Yosemiter (talk) 21:12, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Alice Naylor-Leyland for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alice Naylor-Leyland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alice Naylor-Leyland until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ymblanter (talk) 08:25, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Emma Thynn, Viscountess Weymouth) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Emma Thynn, Viscountess Weymouth, Willthacheerleader18!

Wikipedia editor RingtailedFox just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"The article looks very well written!"

To reply, leave a comment on RingtailedFox's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 20:42, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Oladipo Jadesimi) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Oladipo Jadesimi, Willthacheerleader18!

Wikipedia editor Abishe just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Happy Holidays text.png Hello Willthacheerleader18: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 06:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

To reply, leave a comment on Abishe's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Abishe (talk) 06:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Mary Constance Wyndham
Hi, I'm Abishe. Willthacheerleader18, thanks for creating Mary Constance Wyndham!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Happy Holidays text.png Hello Willthacheerleader18: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 04:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 04:31, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady Mary Charteris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Lady ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lady_Mary_Charteris check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lady_Mary_Charteris?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.--John (talk) 11:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Mandatory notice
--John (talk) 11:30, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady Mary Charteris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lady_Mary_Charteris check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lady_Mary_Charteris?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rudy Burckhardt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patrician ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Rudy_Burckhardt check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Rudy_Burckhardt?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

February 2018
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Laverne Cox. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  23:31, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Teun In der Maur
Hello, Willthacheerleader18,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Teun In der Maur should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Teun In der Maur.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Anna Wintour
While I have thanked you for this edit, I just realized right afterwards that one of the two sources used, Women's Wear Daily, is actually a credible and reliable one, and we should probably incorporate material from it into the article. Daniel Case (talk) 19:55, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Liam Riley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liam Riley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liam Riley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cssiitcic (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Lady Kitty Spencer


A tag has been placed on Lady Kitty Spencer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Edwardx (talk) 23:40, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

EJ Johnson
Hi Willthacheerleader18. I ran across EJ Johnson while searching for usage of celebritynetworth.com (which is generally unreliable for biographical per Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_207). Looking the article in more detail, it looks almost like it came from a previously deleted article, but I'm not seeing any log entries for past versions. Did you make it from scratch? --Ronz (talk) 03:58, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, I wrote it myself. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 04:22, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. You probably saw that I remove the jimmyjazz.com reference as well due to reliability concerns. Looks like there are plenty of far better ones to draw from regardless. Thanks for your work. --Ronz (talk) 04:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

More to it than meets "first glance"? Transfeminine
You reverted a revert of a complete text replacement of the previous article. Please note the ingratiating explanatory summary by that IP:
 * "there are only two genders milady"

Also please note that the replacement text in Transfeminine exactly(?) duplicates article Sex and gender distinction (which has been around in same form over a year), so methinks the IP was not "on the good side".

Also, the subject matter attracts vandals, as a glance at Sex and gender distinction history will show.

Also, plagiarism to or fro WP in ext page and, apparently, several others (on balance, they are 'quoting' WP?)

I believe very little at first glance here. 'Vandalism' as a judgement cannot be just what meets the eye, but what the page histories and user contributions reveal. Useful side effect of checking out the user contributions is cleaning up all the other badnesses executed, when indeed they are vandals.

Anyway, I'm going to revert your revert of the other revert of ... Arrgh! Shenme (talk) 02:26, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Disrespectful editing & for no reason.
Do not edit my information again, I have done my research me and 49 others discussed adding that info. Im a lieutenant in local law enforcement in NC and have also done my own personal research. Thanks Mwhitley2x (talk) 22:25, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I have no idea to what you are referring. If it is about information in an article you have contributed to then I would suggest you include a link to it. I would also like to remind you that no article on Wikipedia "belongs" to anyone, so any information is not "yours". All editors on Wikipedia can contribute to any article. Your rank in local NC law enforcement is irrelevant. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment I went back and looked through my edits to find what you were referring to and realized you are upset because I reverted an edit you made on Figure Eight Island. The information you added to the article was not cited with any references. On Wikipedia, material that has no credible source can be removed at any time from an article. I highly doubt you consulted 49 individuals about adding one sentence to an article. And even if you had, you should provide a reference with proper citation. Policy stands with me on this. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kitty Spencer has been accepted
 Kitty Spencer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! GRuban (talk) 03:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Kitty_Spencer help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Storm Model Management
Hello friend, I hope you are fine. You are right to point out that few of these models and celebrities are linked to the Storm Model Management through reliable, third-party sources. So I have removed all of those who aren't. Please don’t add again without reliable and authoritative third-party sources. I know you will agree, because just above on this page, your talk page, you wrote to another editor: "The information you added to the article was not cited with any references. On Wikipedia, material that has no credible source can be removed at any time from an article." Thanks and best regards, George Custer&#39;s Sabre (talk) 05:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carl von In der Maur
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carl von In der Maur you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 14:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

swapped them
I swapped the pages, now its your turn to go in the field. go! go! go! lol — usernamekiran (talk)  21:04, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * I restored everything. I apologise for the mess again. See you around :) — usernamekiran (talk)  21:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Ah! Sorry, I was away from the computer. No problem, it was an easy fix! Thanks again! :) -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:26, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Holy Trinity Anglican Church, Raleigh
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Holy Trinity Anglican Church, Raleigh, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 00:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Holy Trinity Anglican Church, Raleigh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Trinity Anglican Church, Raleigh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Anglican Church, Raleigh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  TT me 02:30, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of women's firsts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lauren Anderson ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_women%27s_firsts check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_women%27s_firsts?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello
you are amazing... editor🏅, you many created many royalty article. Thanks Emily Khine (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Just doing what I can. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 22:56, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
- MrX 🖋 11:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

You reverted a challenged edit on Melania Trump. That violates the editing restrictions which state: "You must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article." Please be careful and use the talk page to seek consensus for contested material. Thank you.- MrX 🖋 11:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lady Amelia Windsor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War Child ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Lady_Amelia_Windsor check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Lady_Amelia_Windsor?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Leah Guey listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Leah Guey. Since you had some involvement with the Leah Guey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Lady Ursula d’Abo.jpeg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:02, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Red Links
I will not stop creating the single Ligon Flynn Red Link in the Figure Eight Island article. Per WP:Red Link, there is no problem with having Red Links for articles that are either forthcoming or should be. Ligon Flynn actually happens to be a noted architect, with a distinctive architectural design imprint, a storied, award-winning career. A study conducted in 2008 showed that red links helped Wikipedia grow, and keep articles from being orphaned from the start. So please stop stripping the Red Link from the article. Thanks. 842U (talk) 10:36, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Carl von In der Maur
The article Carl von In der Maur you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carl von In der Maur for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Auntieruth55 -- Auntieruth55 (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Read this Message Please !
Why you Removed the Saint Infobox of Page Pope John XXIII Martin James A. Marquez (talk) 06:10, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I removed it because it was dubious. Pope John XXIII already has a Papal infobox which has information regarding his sainthood already. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:12, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Edit-warring at Rachel Yeoh and Michelle Yeoh (socialite). The edit-warring was all the more unacceptable because you posted a warning about edit-warring to the other editor involved, making it clear both that you are aware of Wikipedia's edit-warring policy and that the dispute in which you were involved was an edit-war. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Which only deepened the disruption and made you also an edit warrior. It is not up to admins to step into every content dispute. You need to articulate the steps to take short of seeking an admin intervention.-- <b style="color:black">Dloh cier ekim </b> (talk) 23:31, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul Frame for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Frame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paul Frame until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:05, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Antioch United Methodist Church (Roaring Gap, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antioch United Methodist Church (Roaring Gap, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antioch United Methodist Church (Roaring Gap, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:38, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/First Baptist Church (Madison, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:39, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of First Church of Christ, Scientist (Raleigh, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First Church of Christ, Scientist (Raleigh, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/First Church of Christ, Scientist (Raleigh, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Hillyer Memorial Christian Church (Raleigh, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hillyer Memorial Christian Church (Raleigh, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hillyer Memorial Christian Church (Raleigh, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:40, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Holy Trinity Episcopal Church (Greensboro, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Trinity Episcopal Church (Greensboro, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Episcopal Church (Greensboro, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Cathedral (Charlotte, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Cathedral (Charlotte, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Cathedral (Charlotte, North Carolina)& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —DIYeditor (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

deletion mania

 * imho, all 7 subjects just above are valid. Not merely my opinion; I ran careful WP:BEFORE searches and have added WP:RS to most of them.  But I'm gonna have to make time to, you know, do stuff people actually pay me to do for the next few days, so I do hope that you will do whatever you see is necessary to bring them up to snuff.  Cheers!E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you, and thanks again for all your help with improving the articles! I will do what I can as well. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Thank you!! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:14, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Your comment
since you are the only other genuine contributor there wanted to check from you on your conclusion. The only sources are self published. I have a strong feeling that this article is a hoax, Wikipedia rules are strictly applied to WP:BLP and even if there was a one off chance that this person is indeed genuine royal and not a hoax, notability is not WP:NOTINHERITED. So please re consider your !vote. If you are still undecided on taking a stand, you can ignore my comment, cheers. -- D Big X ray ᗙ  16:08, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Zachary Santangelo for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zachary Santangelo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zachary Santangelo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AniMate 03:30, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
 * {{u|Willthacheerleader18]]... so sad for these article... I don't know that Nomination because I'm no active on wikipedia at that time, Btw your are my idol...Once, you have rescue... one of my created royal article... So, love from Myanmar <3. Thanks Hninthuzar (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Charlie van Straubenzee) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Charlie van Straubenzee.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Reviewed, well done.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:36, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Princess Nora of Oettingen-Spielberg


The article Princess Nora of Oettingen-Spielberg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no evidence of notability, refs are essentially wedding announcements."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 05:03, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Princess Nora of Oettingen-Spielberg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Nora of Oettingen-Spielberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Princess Nora of Oettingen-Spielberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ... so sad for these article... I don't know that Nomination because I'm no active on wikipedia at that time, Btw your are my idol...Once time, you have rescue... one of my created royal article... So, love from Myanmar <3. Thanks Hninthuzar (talk) 09:23, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you ...
... for helping to keep Zu den heiligen Engeln! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
 * No problem! I'm glad I could be of service! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
 * @Gerda Arendt, thank you so much for the recognition! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 20:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)


 * A year ago, you were recipient no. 2097 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Using proper titles for Ethiopian royalty and nobility
Please adhere to the proper titles for Ethiopian nobility and royalty. H.I.H. is reserved for members of the royal family by blood not by marriage. Also, the male descendants inherit the title of prince but "princess" is not inherited nor is it automatic at the point of marriage, but rather it is bestowed by the emperor at his discretion after (1) a woman of the royal family comes of age or (2) when a woman is married into the family. This is solely at teh discretion of the Emperor. There are many members of the royal family who have not been bestowed the title and are direct descendants of a crowned monarch. These mistaken appropriations are the application of western views of monarchic structure to a much older Ethiopian monarchy. Please see the below information available on Wikipedia on "Ethiopian aristocratic and court titles" which outlines the proper uses of titles and honorifics.

Imperial and royal titles[edit] Negusa Nagast[edit]

Emperor Tewodros II of the Ethiopian Empire. The Negusa Nagast (Ge'ez: ንጉሠ ነገሥት nəgusä nägäst, "King of Kings") was the Emperor of Ethiopia. Although several kings of Aksum used this style, until the restoration of the Solomonic dynasty under Yekuno Amlak, rulers of Ethiopia generally used the style of Negus, although "King of Kings" was used as far back as Ezana.

The full title of the Emperor of Ethiopia was Negusa Nagast and Seyoume Igziabeher (Ge'ez: ሥዩመ እግዚአብሔር; "Elect of God"). The title Moa Anbessa Ze Imnegede Yehuda ("Conquering Lion of the Tribe of Judah") always preceded the titles of the Emperor. It was not a personal title but rather referred to the title of Jesus and placed the office of Christ ahead of the Emperor's name in an act of Imperial submission. Until the reign of Yohannes IV, the Emperor was also Neguse Tsion (Ge'ez: ንጉሠ ጽዮን, nəgusä tsiyon), "King of Zion"), whose seat was at Axum, and which conferred hegemony over much of the north of the Empire.

The Emperor was referred to by the dignities of the formal Girmawi (Ge'ez: ግርማዊ, gärimawi, "His Imperial Majesty"), in common speech as Janhoy (Ge'ez: ጃንሆይ janihoy, "Your [Imperial] Majesty, or lit. "sire" ), in his own household and family as Getochu (our Master in the plural), and when referred to by name in the third person with the suffix of Atse (effectively "Emperor", i.e. Atse Menelik).

All formal speech concerning the Emperor was in the plural, as was his own speech; Haile Selassie, for instance, referred to himself in the first-person plural at all times, even in casual conversation and when speaking in French (however this was not the case when he spoke in English, in which he was not fully fluent).[2]

Negus[edit]

Main article: Negus King Haile Selassie of the Solomonic dynasty. A Negus (Ge'ez: ንጉሥ nəgus, "king") was a hereditary ruler of one of Ethiopia's larger provinces, over whom collectively the monarch ruled, thus justifying his imperial title. The title of Negus was awarded at the discretion of the Emperor to those who ruled important provinces, although it was often used hereditarily during and after the Zemene Mesafint. The rulers of Begemder, Shewa, Gojjam, Wollo, all held the title of Negus at some point, as the "Negus of Shewa", "Negus of Gojjam", and so forth.

During and after the reign of Menelik II virtually all of the titles either lapsed into the Imperial crown or were dissolved. In 1914, after having been appointed "Negus of Zion" by his son Lij Iyasu (Iyasu V), Mikael of Wollo, in consideration of the hostile feelings this provoked in of much of the nobility in northern Ethiopia (particularly Le'ul Ras Seyoum Mengesha, whose family had resented being denied the title by Menelik), who were now technically made subordinate to him, instead elected to use the title of Negus of Wollo. Tafari Makonnen, who later became Emperor Haile Selassie, was bestowed the title of Negus in 1928; he would be the last person to bear the title.[3]

Despite this, European sources referred to the Ethiopian monarch as the Negus well into the 20th century, switching to Emperor only after the Second World War- around the same time the name Abyssinia fell out of use in favour of Ethiopia in the west.

Le'ul[edit] Le'ul (Ge'ez: ልዑል lə‘ul, "Prince") was a princely style used by sons and grandson of the Emperor. It conferred upon its holder the title of Imperial Highness. The style first came into use in 1916, following the enthronement of Empress.Zewditu

Abeto[edit] Abetohun (Ge'ez: አቤቶሁን abētōhun) or Abeto (Ge'ez: አቤቶ abētō) -- Prince. Title reserved for males of Imperial ancestry in the male line. Title fell into disuse by the late 19th century. Lij Iyasu attempted to revive the title as Abeto-hoy ("Great Prince"), and this form is still used by the current Iyasuist claimant Girma Yohannes Iyasu.

Ras[edit] Ras (Ge'ez: ራስ, translit. ras, lit. 'head', compare with Arabic Rais) -- One of the powerful non-imperial; historian Harold G. Marcus equates this to a duke. The combined title of Leul Ras was given to the heads of the cadet branches of the Imperial dynasty, such as the Princes of Gojjam, Tigray and the Selalle sub-branch of the last reigning Shewan Branch.

Bitwoded[edit] Bitwoded (Ge'ez: ቢትወደድ, translit. bitwädäd, lit. 'beloved') -- An office thought to have been created by Zara Yaqob who appointed two of these, one of the Left and one of the Right. These were later merged into one office, which became the supreme grade of Ras, "Ras Betwadad". Marcus equates the style to an earl.

Lij[edit] Lij (Ge'ez: ልጅ, translit. ləj, lit. 'child') -- Title issued at birth to sons of members of the Mesafint, the hereditary nobility. Men's military titles[edit]

Further information: Ethiopian military titles

Dejazmach (ደጃዝማች däjazmač, "Commander or General of the Gate") -- a military title meaning commander of the central body of a traditional Ethiopian armed force composed of a vanguard, main body, left and right wings and a rear body.[4] Marcus equates this to a count. The heirs of the "Leul Rases" were titled Leul Dejazmach to elevate them above the non-Imperial blood Dejazmaches.

Fit'awrari (ፊትአውራሪ fit’awrari, Commander of the Vanguard) -- a military title meaning commander of the vanguard of a traditional Ethiopian armed force. Marcus equates this to a baron.

Grazmach (ግራዝማች grazmač, Commander of the Left wing) -- a military title meaning commander of the left wing of a traditional Ethiopian armed force.[4]

Qenyazmach (ቀኛዝማች qəñazmač, Commander of the Right wing) -- a military title meaning commander of the right wing of a traditional Ethiopian armed force.[4]

Azmach (አዝማች azmač, Commander of the Rearguard) -- a military title meaning commander of the rearguard of a traditional Ethiopian armed force. This was usually a trustworthy counselor and the leader's chief minister.[4]

Balambaras (ባላምባራስ balambaras, Commander of an Amba or fortress) -- these could also be commanders of the guards, artillery or cavalry of a traditional Ethiopian armed force, basically a man entrusted with important commands.[4] Women's honorifics[edit]

Nigiste Negestatt - "Empress Regnant" (ንግሥተ ነገሥታት nígəstä nəgəstât) (in her own right) Literally "Queen of Kings," or "Queen of Queens," or "female ruler of an empire." Zewditu (reigned 1917–1930) was the only woman to be crowned in Ethiopia in her own right since ancient times. Rather than take the title Itege, which was reserved for empress consorts, Zewditu was given the feminized version of Nigusa Nigist to indicate that she reigned in her own right. She was accorded the dignity of Girmawit ("Imperial Majesty") and the title of Siyimta Igzi'abher (ሥይምተ እግዚአብሔር səyəmtä ’əgziabhēr, "Elect of God"). She was commonly referred to as Nigist "Queen". The 1955 Constitution of Ethiopia excluded women from the succession to the throne so this title was effectively abolished.

Itege (እቴጌ ’ətēgē) "empress consort". Empresses were generally crowned as consorts by the emperor at the Imperial Palace. However, Taytu Betul, consort of Menelik II, became the first Itege to be crowned by the Emperor at church rather than at the Palace. Her coronation took place on the second day of the emperor's coronation holiday. Menen Asfaw became the first Itege to be crowned by the archbishop on the same day and during the same ceremony as her husband, Haile Selassie. The Itege was entitled to the dignity of Girmawit ("Her/Your Imperial Majesty").

Le'elt (ልዕልት lə‘əlt) "Princess". Title came into use in 1916 upon the enthronement of Zewditu. Reserved at birth for daughters of the monarch and patrilineal granddaughters. Usually bestowed on the wives of "Leul Rases" as well as the monarch's granddaughters in the female line upon their marriages. The notable exception to the rule was Leult Yeshashework Yilma, Emperor Haile Selassie's niece by his elder brother, who received the title with the dignity of "Highness" from Zewditu upon the princess' marriage to Leul Ras Gugsa Araya Selassie in 1918, and then again from her uncle upon his coronation in 1930 with the enhanced dignity of "Imperial Highness".

Emebet Hoy (እመቤት ሆይ ’əmäbēt hōy, "Great Royal Lady") --Reserved for the wives of those bearing the title of Leul Dejazmach and other high ranking women of Royal blood.

Emebet (እመቤት, "Royal Lady" ’əmäbēt) --Reserved for the unmarried granddaughters of the monarch in the female line (they were generally granted the title of leult upon marriage), and to the daughters of the "Leul Rases".

Woyzero (ወይዘሮ wäyzärō, Dame) -- Originally high noble title that over time came to be the general accepted form of address for married women in general (Mrs.). It was still awarded by the Emperor on rare occasions in the 20th century to non-royal women, and sometimes with the higher grade of Woizero Hoy (Great Dame).

Woyzerit (ወይዘሪት wäyzärit, Lady) -- Originally high ranking noble title for unmarried women, now the general accepted form of address for unmarried women in general (Miss). It was sometimes awarded with the added distinction of Woizerit Hoy (Great Lady), but only to widows. Important regional offices[edit]

Bahr negus (ባህር ንጉሥ bahər nəgus, "ruler of the Seas") -- King of the territories north of the Mareb River, and as a result the most powerful office in medieval Ethiopia after the Emperor himself. As a result of the revolts of the Bahr negus Yeshaq and the self-determination of Medri Bahri in modern-day Eritrea in the later 16th century, this office lost much of its power. Although men are mentioned as holding this office into the early 18th century, they were of little consequence.[citation needed]

Meridazmach (መርዕድ አዝማች märəd ’azmač, "Fearsome Commander" or "supreme general") -- This title is related to "Dejazmach" or "Kenyazmach" above. Beginning in the 18th century, this came to denote the ruler of Shewa until Sahle Selassie dropped it in favor of the title of Negus. Later revived in 1930 in Wollo for Crown Prince Asfaw Wossen.

Mesfin Harar (መስፍነ ሐረር mäsfinä ḥarar) --Duke of Harar. Hereditary title created in 1930 for Emperor Haile Selassie's second son, Prince Makonnen. (The wife of the Mesfin was properly titled Sefanit, but was more commonly referred to as the Mesfinit). Upon the death of the Prince, his son Prince Wossen Seged was elevated as Mesfin Harar and would currently be second in line in the line of succession if Ethiopia were still a monarchy after Prince Zera Yacob.

Nebura ed (ንቡረ እድ nəburä ’əd, one put in office through the laying of hands") -- civil governor of Axum reserved for the clergy. Also called Liqat Aksum. Because of the historical and symbolic importance of this city, the rules of precedence promulgated in 1689 ranked the Nebura ed ahead of all of the provincial governors. Indeed, when the title was granted with Ras Warq (the right to wear a coronet), it was higher than even the title of Ras. Although a civil title granted by the Emperor, it was usually bestowed on a clergyman due to Axum's status as the holiest site of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church within the country.[5] The title of Nebure ed was also granted to the administrator of the Church of St. Mary at Addis Alem, founded by Menelik II west of Addis Ababa. However the Nebura ed of Addis Alem was much further down the hierarchy than the Nebura ed of Axum, and was not accorded the Ras Warq.

Tigray Mekonnen (ትግራይ መኮንን təgray mäkōnən) -- governor of the province of Tigray. Under the rule of Emperor Yohannes IV in the late 19th century, the Tigray Mekonnen briefly became responsible for the territories once controlled by the Bahrnegus, and became the most powerful governor of Eritrea. Wagshum (ዋግሹም wagšum) -- governor (or shum) of the province of Wag. The Wagshum was a hereditary title, and these rulers traced their ancestry back to the imperial family of the Zagwe dynasty.

Shum Agame -- Governor of Agame province of Tigray, and hereditary in the family of Dejazmach Sabagadis Woldu, a major figure of the Zemene Mesafint (Era of the Princes) period. Ras Sebhat Aregawi, a longtime rival of the family of Emperor Yohannes IV was one of the more famous of the Shum Agame. Shum Tembien (ሹም ታምብየን šum tambyän) -- Governor of Tembien district of Tigray. Emperor Yohannes IV was the son of Shum Mercha of Tembien. Jantirar - Title reserved for the males of the family who ruled over the mountain fortress of Ambassel in Wollo (now Debub Wollo Zone). The title of Jantirar is among the oldest in the Ethiopian Empire. Empress Menen, consort of Emperor Haile Selassie, was the daughter of Jantirar Asfaw. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.22.61.38 (talk) 02:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This conversation belongs on the article's talk page, not here. Your continous edits from various IP addresses has been nothing but disruptive. Wikipedia is not a source, so we do not base edits off of information in other articles, but from independent reliable sources. The sources used in the article back my edits. Makonnen also styles herself as H.I.H. Princess Ariana Austin Makonnen. Furthermore, the monarchy of Ethiopia was deposed and the last emperor is dead, so he is unable to "bestow" the title of princess. Is it up to the Crown Council now? If you can find a source that counters this information, then we can add it in. But for now, the sources contradict your edits. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:45, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.22.61.38 (talk) 02:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
 * This is my first time trying to use the "talk" feature. I didn't know that there was a difference between the article's talk page and this talk page. My edits have been few and far between, but I did inform others that references to valid outside sources and inside sources are being undone and wikipedia is ascribing rank in a way that is disrespectful to others.  There are many women who are BY BLOOD unable to use the title Princess because they did not come of age before the monarchy was deposed. In the absence of an emperor there are no new princesses. None of the wives of the men in the royal family have been bestowed the title of "Princess". There are instances that a woman may be referred to as "princess" as a courtesy, but this is in no way an official title. There are many people trying to dispel miunderstandings like this. The link that you cited is from a former employer who was provided the information from an outside source that likely got it from Wikipedia, which is the only place where she is referred to as H.I.H Princess Makonnen. The website that you listed as a reference will be corrected after the holidays, as the person responsible for such edits is off. We were assured that it would be corrected posthaste with the sincerest apologies for the confusion. Independent reliable sources are available that define the terms. http://www.ethiohistory.com/aristocratic-and-court-titles-in-ethiopian-history and http://enacademic.com/dic.nsf/enwiki/1222077#Women.27s_honorifics for example expressly define the term princess in the Ethiopian context as a bestowed title that is not passed automatically to people within the royal family, let alone those outside of the bloodline by marriage. Though the title has been said to be used casually by people referring to the spouse of a prince of the blood, the spouse is not actually a princess unless the title is granted to her. Is it up to the Crown Council now that the council is in exile and the monarch has been killed? No, the Crown Council will not nor has it taken on the role of bestowing monarchic titles onto people. Can you imagine the political implications if they were to do so? The sources are here and many others are available that identify what an Ethiopian princess is. Your application of the title is outside of the valid cited material here. Think of it this way. This is not the first man in the royal family to be married, yet none of the other women are titled as "HIH" nor "princess".  Mrs. Makonnen is a lovely lady, but she is no greater than the other wives in the royal family. She is only different because she is the first black American to marry into the family and so the American media paid attention to her. This doesn't give her the right to titles that other women who have supported the family as wives and mothers decades before her do not have. Passing reference to someone as a "princess" as a courtesy for the sake of her husband is not the same as claiming that this is her rank/title. Please stop referring to her as having the official title of Princess until a monarchy is reinstated and it can be bestowed by the appropriate party. This is the best way to ensure accuracy and respect for those who are in the family and have more of a right to call themselves a princess, but do not out of respect for the title and know that they cannot just assume titles because the West sees it as inherently theirs for the taking. I hope that you see my point.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.223.5.124 (talk) 04:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bethany C. Meyers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bethany C. Meyers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bethany C. Meyers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Melcous (talk) 22:52, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

BRD
Not clearly. It was added without sources and without explanation here. No albums to verify, so keep it out. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If I provide reliable sources (which his article already does) then I can add it as I see fit, thank you. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

DYK
I nominated an article of yours for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Victoria Loke. SL93 (talk) 11:55, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Wow! Thanks so much! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 13:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. The article has recently passed a DYK review. SL93 (talk) 17:46, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Greek Royalty
In reading the policies of Wikipedia, I think one of the underlying concepts is that the entries should contain fact and not fiction. The simple fact is that Greece has no royalty. Therefore, even having a category called Greek Royalty is fictive. The category could accurately be called former Greek Royalty and any entries there would then be factual as to the historical figures who occupied positions of royalty during the time that Greece had royalty.

I was, therefore, surprised to find entries giving titles to people such as “crown prince” or “crown princess” of Greece. This implies, by the definition of crown prince, that this person would be next to acsend to the throne. However, there is no throne to acsend to in Greece. While Pavlos was crown prince when he was born, he is no longer the crown prince because there is no longer a kingdom where he will ascend to the throne. I see the term “crown prince“ as a job description so I would be OK with his Wikipedia entry being titled former crown prince of Greece. Just as his wife is certainly not the crown princess of Greece. She was not even born into this title. She is simply married to the former crown prince of Greece. And their children could be accurately described as the sons or daughters of the former crown prince of Greece or, alternately, grandsons and granddaughters of the former king of Greece.

I would not expect Wikipedia entries to give people inaccurate titles. If someone was the CEO of IBM 30 years ago, his Wikipedia entry would certainly indicate he was a former CEO. This is no different.

To call people prince or princess also implies some sort of accreditation by the country their title is associated to. There is certainly no such accreditation forthcoming from the country of Greece. If the former crown prince wishes to use his Danish Royal lineage, where royalty still exist, that would be accurate. But the Greek titles are not. People can call themselves whatever they want but their entries in Wikipedia should reflect who they actually are. Willthacheerleader18 changed my edits to the entries stating that they did not conform to the policies of Wikipedia. I disagree. He said the titles are included as a courtesy. Encyclopedias are not designed to be courteous. They should be accurate. They should not propagate myths. And, just because “the press” uses the royal titles, as Willthacheerleader18 pointed out, is no good reason for Wikipedia to do so. Any press that covers these people is, frankly speaking, probably not representative of the highest level of journalism. He also gave examples of other people who use titles that are meaningless. I think his example is a good one but for the opposite reason of what he intended. All those fictive titles should be changed. If the people’s passports don’t say “Crown Prince of Greece” or “Christoph Prince of Schleswig Holstein” their Wikipedia entries should not either. To be a member of a defunct royal house is to be a member of nothing. The historical fact that these people’s relatives were royalty is important to note but for Wikipedia to continue to propagate titles generations after they lost their legal standing and meaning is inconsistent with the stated pillars of the organization. Since Wikipedia is the first place people tend to go these days for facts, they should get them. The use of “former” and “descendant of” are fine and accurate descriptions. This egalitarian organization should not be used as a PR tool for descendants of ousted royals to perpetuate mythical titles.

I have an educated opinion and Willthacheerleader18 does too. But I don’t agree that his is actually more valid than mine. I find it insulting to have my edits changed without a discussion. His opinion was interesting but in no way definitive.

Ajecon (talk) 16:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)


 * There is a category for Greek royalty just like there is for French, German, Russian, etc. even though these kingdoms and empires are also no more. As I stated on your talk page, Pavlos was crown prince at birth. No one will succeed him in that title, he was born a crown prince while the monarchy was still in power. If someone were a CEO of IBM, the article would refer to them as a businessman who served as CEO from a specific date to another specific date. I did not change your edits, another user did. I simply thought I should explain WHY they were changed, as that user did not reach out to you. You do realize the argument you are making against me (to a third party?) is on my talk page, right? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much!! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:27, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Wikidata
Halo Willthacheerleader18, saya lihat artikel-artikel Anda banyak yang belum di-interwiki-kan ke Wikidata & saya sudah meng-interwiki-kan ke Wikidata seluruh artikel yang sebelumnya belum di-interwiki-kan ke Wikidata tersebut. Mohon lain kali agar Anda sendiri yang meng-interwiki-kan artikel buatan Anda ke Wikidata karena hal tersebut dapat membantu orang untuk mengetahui apakah artikel tersebut sudah dibuat di Wikipedia bahasa Indonesia atau tidak.

Untuk informasi lebih lanjut mengenai Wikidata, silahkan lihat ini: Wikidata --Glorious Engine (talk) 05:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thomas van Straubenzee
Elliot2496 (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2019 (UTC) Thomas did not attend Eton school. He is an old Harrovian.


 * Elliot2496 I have moved your comment down to the bottom of my talk page for organizational purposes. I assume you are referring to information in the article for Thomas van Straubenzee. This conversation belongs on the article's talk page. I will move it there. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Kennedy deaths
I've been trying to correct the Carolyn_Bessette-Kennedy and John_F._Kennedy_Jr pages Please be aware that both John and Carolyn are alive and well and references to their death need to be updated — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rightlaugh paul (talk • contribs) 16:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Rightlaugh paul, This information is false. You have been warned already not to add this information back into the article. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Caroline Vreeland
Hey. I G7ed my draft of Caroline Vreeland because God know when I was ever gonna get around to it, so thanks for making that page. One less to worry about. Trillfendi (talk) 00:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No problem, Trillfendi! Happy to help! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Ekaterina Malysheva
Nicely done :) Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Oiyarbepsy! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:10, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Jos Charles
Just so you know, Jos Charles wasn't a Lammy nominee at the 28th Lambda Literary Awards, to which you added her earlier today — she got her nomination at the 29th Lambda Literary Awards, where her name was already listed under the appropriate category. You can see this list on their website if you need confirmation. Bearcat (talk) 15:21, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Bearcat, thank you for the clarification! My mistake. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

You just created this article with completely Bare URLs? I noticed you have over 20,000 edits in the mainspace. Have you considered using complete inline citations? A loose noose (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I usually go back later in the day and fill them back in, which is what I was planning on. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Chantal, Marina and Amelia
I think it's poor form to recreate pages that were deleted after a deletion discussion. Deletion review is used when 'significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page'. Celia Homeford (talk) 10:46, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Celia Homeford embarrassingly, I was unaware of deletion review so thank you for bringing it to my attention. From now on in creating articles that had previously been deleted after nomination and discussion, I will approach it this way. In fairness, it is now 2019 and Lady Amelia Windsor was deleted in 2015, Lady Marina Windsor was merged in 2017, and Chantal Hochuli was deleted in 2013. Since that time, as the articles' sources show, there has been significant coverage on all three subjects over the past few years. Regardless, you are right to inform me of deletion review. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Victoria Loke
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Knock Shrine
Please don't undo the revisions to the article without explaining your reasons. I have explained in detail why the revisions were necessary in the talk page. The next time you do it will be locked to editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JD143726 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Knock
I explained my reasons on the Knock Talk page. Banal sociological analysis that can be applied to ANY apparition should not dominate this page. I have also included a link by a prominent scholar on the eschatological significance of the apparitions for Catholics. Please respect this. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JD143726 (talk • contribs) 17:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tessa Ganserer at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 13:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your deletion
A comma does indeed belong here. This is commas 101. Why did you delete it? Without any edit summary, as well. Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mel_Tomlinson&diff=883861135&oldid=883859597 --2604:2000:E010:1100:21AD:F2D7:D68D:954C (talk) 09:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Thyra von Westernhagen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thyra von Westernhagen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thyra von Westernhagen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 22:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Changes to DOTY
Please read the guidelines and the many discussions on this subject on the relevant pages before making snarky comments when people undo your errors. Deb (talk) 08:51, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm aware. I suggest making appropriate changes to pages you police heavily. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Appreciate you actually notifying me this time of the nomination for deletion. You should sign these things though. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 13:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Amur senza fin
Hello! Your submission of Amur senza fin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Axem Titanium (talk) 06:29, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 06:44, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Willthacheerleader18, and welcome to Women in Red. I see you have already created a large number of women biographies but now that you are an "official" member of our project, I hope you will be inspired to create many more. You may find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any problems or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Tessa Ganserer
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for Tessa, and the many others! She is also featured on Portal:Germany. I would have loved this image to appear on the Main page today, instead of the horse: a woman smiling openly, and openly experienced. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:52, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Amur senza fin
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Queen Charlotte's Ball) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Queen Charlotte's Ball.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 12:09, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing it! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Queen Charlotte's Ball
Hello! Your submission of Queen Charlotte's Ball at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ___<em style="font-family:grafolitascript;color:#aa6ef4">CAPTAIN MEDUSA <em style="font-family:grafolitascript;color:#000000">talk   13:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll check now! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)

Support
Hello, I have created 24th in line of succession to the British Throne Samuel Chatto from redirect. please support this article. you know I'm who you are. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 17:18, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Caroline Vreeland) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Caroline Vreeland.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

--- <b style="color: DarkOrchid"> DOOMSDAYER 520</b> (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of St. Katherine Greek Orthodox Church (Burlington, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Katherine Greek Orthodox Church (Burlington, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/St. Katherine Greek Orthodox Church (Burlington, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 23:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church (Jefferson, North Carolina) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church (Jefferson, North Carolina) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/St. Francis of Assisi Catholic Church (Jefferson, North Carolina) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 23:50, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Queen Charlotte's Ball
Hello! Your submission of Queen Charlotte's Ball at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019
First off "singular 'they' pronouns" is not part of proper English in my view and clearly as the Wikipedia page for the 'singular they' also states that "It has been commonly employed in everyday English ever since then, though it has become the target of criticism since the late-19th century." Which seems to suggest I am not the only one, perhaps if you had decided to go to "English 101" as you so eloquently put it. Then you would've known that too. Also, I would like to add that the character in the show is not non-binary and in fact has transitioned into a male character and soooo maybe change that... Unless you think it is vandalism? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swobniarsodot (talk • contribs) 18:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
 * "in my view", exactly. Your view. It is part of proper English. It does not matter what your opinion on the matter is. More importantly, you violated Wikipedia policy. The article is about the actor themself, not the character, who has not transitioned into male but identifies as non-binary and uses singular they pronouns (not female pronouns, as you've insinuated), as the sources suggest. The information you added was not only incorrect, it was unsourced. You have already been warned by another editor for your edits, which appear to be vandalism, and you will be reported if you do so again. Wikipedia articles are not for you to express your opinion. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

"Watson plays the role of gender non-binary character Susie Theo Putnam" - these are your own words not mine. Which clearly says that the character NOT the actor is non-binary and he has transition from female to male... Swobniarsodot (talk) 11:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * My words? Those are the words in the article based off of the information in the provided sources. Click the links. If the character has transitioned, we need a source to back that claim. Wikipedia information has to be sourced. I am talking about the fact that you changed the pronouns of the actor themself, which were incorrect. You violated policy and were warned. Don't do it again. End of discussion.-- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:55, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

actually i changed that too.. Its pretty clear even in season one... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swobniarsodot (talk • contribs) 15:36, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Which was incorrect and has been reverted. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:08, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Lady Louise Windsor
A topic that you had commented on previously has come up again. Specifically, there is a new discussion here about using an Infobox royalty or nobility for Lady Louise Windsor. If you could possibly provide a comment there, that would be greatly appreciated. Thanks for your help! -- Blairall (talk) 01:27, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Mary Day (dance teacher)
Thanks for starting Mary Day (dance teacher). I can't find any reliable sources that verifies her middle name, Henry, or otherwise. If you can find a quality source, please add it or correct the article(s): hopefully the name isn't an invention of Wikipedia. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 23:38, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Queen Charlotte's Ball
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

DYK for Edward Windsor, Lord Downpatrick
— Maile (talk) 00:01, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Greetings
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. I wanted to thank you for your significant contributions to 2019 UNCC shooting. Could you please view this (at the bottom) and help me out to prevent this article from being locked due to edit warring. Thanks, EDG 543 (talk) 19:24, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarah Culberson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kposowa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sarah_Culberson check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sarah_Culberson?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Archiving?
Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you.

Nomination of Zoë de Givenchy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoë de Givenchy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zoë de Givenchy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 13:18, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

June events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Carlo von Zeitschel
Hello, Willthacheerleader18,

Thanks for creating Carlo von Zeitschel! I edit here too, under the username Lopifalko and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lopifalko (talk) 18:44, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alice Stanley, Countess of Derby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Countess of Derby ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alice_Stanley%2C_Countess_of_Derby check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alice_Stanley%2C_Countess_of_Derby?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Maria Breunner-Enkevoith
Hello, Willthacheerleader18,

Thanks for creating Maria Breunner-Enkevoith! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 16:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Alana Bunte for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alana Bunte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alana Bunte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 07:19, 9 June 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lei von Habsburg-Lothringen
Hello, Willthacheerleader18,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Lei von Habsburg-Lothringen, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click   button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 02:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Lei von Habsburg-Lothringen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lei von Habsburg-Lothringen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lei von Habsburg-Lothringen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 03:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

Wuna of Wessex
Please don't cite those awful websites. They are prima facie unreliable. Note how they don't even cite sources. There are a few sources on Wuna, and this one is from a very decent press. I happen to know a thing or two about Boniface, and there is no "Christian tradition" that has her as his sister. There may be a few late medieval rumors somewhere, but if that is so, those need to be cited properly, and not as "tradition", rather as legend. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:45, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Seriously. I don't want to warn you via a template, but this is serious. YOU are the one who should argue that your sources are in any way acceptable. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Threatening me when you are the one edit warring. Rich. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:BRD is just an essay, though it is a useful guideline. WP:RS, however, is a pretty serious content guideline. Drmies (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

July events from Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Charlotte of Monaco (1719 – 1790) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Charlotte of Monaco (1719 – 1790), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. <b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 07:16, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Whether Outline of Catholic canon law requires sources
There is a discussion of whether Outline of Catholic canon law requires sources to exist in articlespace here: User_talk:CASSIOPEIA.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Princess Marie-Françoise of Bourbon-Parma) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Princess Marie-Françoise of Bourbon-Parma.

User:Lefcentreright while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Lefcentreright (talk) 19:26, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Tobacco Road Dance Productions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tobacco Road Dance Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tobacco Road Dance Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 18:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Stmichaelangelchurch.jpg


The file File:Stmichaelangelchurch.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Princess Keisha Omilana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Keisha Omilana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Princess_Keisha_Omilana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MVaughnn (talk) 01:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

October Events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Caroline Daur
Hello Willthacheerleader18,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Caroline Daur for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 15:25, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello TomCat4680, I replied on your talk page, as you suggested, but it appears you deleted it. I cannot contest the deletion for the article because it was deleted in under two minutes of having been nominated by you. Is it possible to take this to AFD instead? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:45, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I didn't delete it, I only nominated it for deletion. User:Anthony Bradbury did the deletion. TomCat4680 (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * @TomCat4680, You deleted my post on your talk page, not the article. I could not respond to you on the article's talk page, as it was deleted. The article was deleted at 15:26 by Anthony Bradbury. You nominated it at 15:25. That didn't give me time to contest the speedy deletion. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you still think the person is notable enough for an article, go ahead and re-add it. I'll leave it alone, but someone else might re-nominate it for deletion. TomCat4680 (talk) 16:09, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * @TomCat4680 Thank you. Is there a way I can access a version of the article prior to deletion? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:10, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No it's gone. Just re-build it from scratch. TomCat4680 (talk) 16:30, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Or you could take your case to WP:DRV. ミラP 02:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! <b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b> (<b style="color:#009900">talk</b> / <b style="color:#009900">edits</b>) 16:39, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Nadja Malacrida
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Nomination of Jamie Chua for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamie Chua is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jamie Chua until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - ChrisWar666 (talk) 02:44, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

"Louise of Anhalt-Dessau (Q1876675)" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Louise of Anhalt-Dessau (Q1876675). Since you had some involvement with the Louise of Anhalt-Dessau (Q1876675) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 03:46, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

December events with WIR
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Draft:Charlotte of Monaco (1719 – 1790) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charlotte of Monaco (1719 – 1790), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Federer (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swiss-German ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Federer_%28surname%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Federer_%28surname%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Message from Project North Carolina
Hello Fellow North Carolina user,

I have reorganized and updated the content for the WikiProject North Carolina. I hope it is useful to improving collaboration.

User:G._Moore Talk —Preceding undated comment added 03:42, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Beatrix von Storch
You've been reverted twice now at Beatrix von Storch. Please follow WP:BRD and raise your concerns at the article Talk page. I see that you've been warned five times before about BRD; please take consensus seriously, and discuss your desired changes instead of trying to force them. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 21:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I understand, although I do not understand your removal of the actual legal name and a wikilink to another article during your revisions, so I have restored those. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 21:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Whether you understand or not, does not give you carte blanche to insist on your version, when two other editors have already called you out on it. I have reverted you again, and I'm requesting again that you observe WP:BRD and take your concerns to the article Talk page. You're not a newbie, you know that we seek to achieve consensus through discussion, and not force things via edit warring. Mathglot (talk) 21:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px; " class="plainlinks"> 豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune. このミラPはWillthacheerleader18たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！ フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE! ミラP 02:59, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

Cecil Chetwynd Kerr, Marchioness of Lothian
In the article about the Marchioness of Lothian, you note John Henry Newman as being "of Dalkeith". There was a similar reference in the article on St David's Church, Dalkeith. I'm not aware of any particular connection between Newman and Dalkeith, and the article on Newman does not suggest any - but have you come across a source that suggests that there was?George Burgess (talk) 15:56, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
 * While I have made edits and additions to the article, I am not the original author and I do not believe I ever added any information about Newman. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Sumika Boyrachasya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sumika Boyrachasya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sumika Boyrachasya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Usedtobecool ☎️ 08:22, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Kesewa Aboah
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

inneresting
David's public profile in Perth Western Australia some years ago was as a ''criminologist' and not 'psychologist'... JarrahTree 04:55, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Interesting. I just used what information the sources provided. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 04:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * ahah - that is a major issue with editing wikipedia... but then wont start that one, will never get off.. cheers JarrahTree 05:00, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Princess Mafalda of Bulgaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Valentino ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Princess_Mafalda_of_Bulgaria check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Princess_Mafalda_of_Bulgaria?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Miriam, Princess of Turnovo moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Miriam, Princess of Turnovo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 11:39, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Antonia Li for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antonia Li is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Antonia Li until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 03:38, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miriam, Princess of Turnovo has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Miriam, Princess of Turnovo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Miriam,_Princess_of_Turnovo help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Adelphia Plantation moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Adelphia Plantation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 02:52, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Bill Bishop bio
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bill_Bishop_(businessman)#Bill_Bishop_entry Alien-in-residence (talk) 07:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Tumurbaatar Enkhtungalag for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tumurbaatar Enkhtungalag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tumurbaatar Enkhtungalag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CAPTAIN MEDUSA  talk  10:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Victoria de Lesseps ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Victoria_de_Lesseps check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Victoria_de_Lesseps?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added links pointing to Bravo TV and De Lesseps
 * Alexandre de Lesseps ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alexandre_de_Lesseps check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alexandre_de_Lesseps?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to De Lesseps
 * Gloria, Princess of Thurn and Taxis ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Gloria%2C_Princess_of_Thurn_and_Taxis check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Gloria%2C_Princess_of_Thurn_and_Taxis?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Dilettante

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolina Santo Domingo has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Carolina Santo Domingo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Carolina_Santo_Domingo help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sulfurboy (talk) 06:54, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

DYK nomination for Carole Baskin
I'm not sure if Wiki gave you a notification, but I've been editing the article for Carole Baskin which you created and have nominated it for DYK. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Don't forget to share a Thanks ♥ ) 16:01, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , I didn't get a notification, but I saw on the article's talk page. Thanks for letting me know! :) -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Alexandre de Lesseps ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Alexandre_de_Lesseps check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Alexandre_de_Lesseps?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to De Lesseps
 * Victoria de Lesseps ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Victoria_de_Lesseps check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Victoria_de_Lesseps?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to De Lesseps

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:37, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey
"Black Barons" stays a userpage until you can get better sources than just 'what they say about themselves'. Check notability criteria at WP:MUSIC. Good luck. DS (talk) 17:14, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
 * If you take a look at the sources I used from their website, you will see they are PDFs from independent sources, mostly Swiss newspapers and magazines, talking about the band's career. The coverage is independent from the band. -- 17:59, 4 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 07:46, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 21:19, 6 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katelyn Clampett (April 14)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Katelyn Clampett and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Katelyn Clampett, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Katelyn_Clampett Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MurielMary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Katelyn_Clampett reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Carole Baskin
&mdash; Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Myka Meier for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Myka Meier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Myka Meier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Manujaineshwar (talk) 15:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Mary von Habsburg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary von Habsburg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mary von Habsburg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 17:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Category:Norman family has been nominated for renaming
Category:Norman family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:09, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of redirection
Hello, and thanks for all your contributions! I am just letting you know that I have redirected Boxley House to Madison,_North_Carolina, because it doesn't indicate how the house meets WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD. I found a few local news articles, but nothing that indicates the house is particularly significant. If you disagree, feel free to restore the article and let me know why you think it's notable. I am happy to discuss this further or take the article to AFD if you would appreciate more community input. Best wishes, Eddie891 Talk Work 00:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Category:Matthews family has been nominated for renaming
Category:Matthews family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:02, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Gottesmann Katalin
https://adtplus.arcanum.hu/hu/view/Tukor_1968_01-03/?query=gottesmann%20kati&pg=226&layout=r

Kérlek, nézzétek meg a magyar oldalon! (források: alul, például cikk a gyáros férjről.) E mail-ben keress meg? Köszönöm.

Nyárizápor (talk) 05:17, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * @Nyárizápor I am not sure what you want me to do.. If you want to add more information to her English article (Katalin zu Windisch-Graetz), then by all means. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 04:16, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarah Reeve Ladson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Charleston and Planter ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Sarah_Reeve_Ladson check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Sarah_Reeve_Ladson?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Centenary Methodist Church (New Bern, North Carolina)
Hi Willthacheerleader18, 10 years ago you asked a question on this page: Talk:Centenary Methodist Church (New Bern, North Carolina). Today I am pleased to give you an answer. Look there. - 79.194.231.9 (talk) 16:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 16:19, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020 at Women in Red
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Chantal, Princess of Hanover, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. PatGallacher (talk) 00:45, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

There is now an AFD discussion on Chantal, Princess of Hanover. PatGallacher (talk) 13:57, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I removed it because I contested the speedy deletion on the talk page, as I thought was protocol. Was that not correct? My apologies if so. Thank you for notifying me about the nomination for deletion. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:23, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Princess Sofía, Duchess of Calabria for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Sofía, Duchess of Calabria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Princess Sofía, Duchess of Calabria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 10:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Swiss socialites


A tag has been placed on Category:Swiss socialites requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:24, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Adelphia Plantation concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Adelphia Plantation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jan-Jaap In der Maur


A tag has been placed on Jan-Jaap In der Maur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  scope_creep Talk  07:36, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Adelphia Plantation


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adelphia Plantation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Alessandra de Osma


The article Alessandra de Osma has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Deposed monarchy cruft, Kingdom of Hanover ceased to exist with unification of Germany."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

October editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Opinion Sought
I wonder whether you have a view of this article: Alistair Macdonald-Radcliff Is the subject notable? It has been nominated for deletion.

Thank you so much.

Best regards,

Tillander 21:01, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Warning for blatant posting of fake, unreferenced and unexplained edits + disruptive editing
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Real Housewives of New York City, you may be blocked from editing. TheHotwiki (talk) 04:23, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
 * @TheHotWiki, Excuse me? I think you're confusing good faith with vandalism. Hardly a reason to threaten with a block. I didn't realize the information was not accurate. I also only performed one edit with which you disagreed with, and reverted. I never edit warred with you or objected to your reversion. Good grief. I suggest you sit down and take a chill pill. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 04:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Royalty notability
Greetings...you have a very good understanding of Wiki policies and have also voted at Afd's for many Royalty related articles. I would appreciate if you could provide your opinion at Articles for deletion/Tripura Sundari Ammani. VocalIndia (talk) 17:48, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Dabney Mercer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dabney Mercer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dabney Mercer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:18, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India Oxenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lifetime.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Oxeneberg family


A tag has been placed on Category:Oxeneberg family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 14:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Order of Prohibited Legitimacy has been nominated for listification
Category:Order of Prohibited Legitimacy has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - RevelationDirect (talk) 10:30, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Useful source
North Carolina Newspapers might help you with your research on historical NC women. -Indy beetle (talk) 05:47, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Ivy Getty moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ivy Getty, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 02:37, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ivy Getty (November 19)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ivy Getty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ivy Getty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ivy_Getty Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MurielMary&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Ivy_Getty reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

December with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Ways to improve Tatiana Hambro
Hello, Willthacheerleader18,

Thank you for creating Tatiana Hambro.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Notability would come from coverage of her career, and most of this section is sourced to coverage which does not meet Wikipedia standards."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 07:39, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

A New Year With Women in Red!
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:03, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Andrew Warren (fashion designer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Warren (fashion designer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Andrew Warren (fashion designer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Gottesmann Katalin
https://hu.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gottesmann_Katalin Szia! A Magyar oldalon más a szócikk. Sokáig ott élt, érdemes utánanéznetek! E mail-ben megkereshetsz! Nyárizápor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyárizápor (talk • contribs) 14:34, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

thepeerage.com
Hi, are you aware thepeerage.com has been deprecated? It looks like several other sources in Maria-Anna Galitzine are also very obviously not suitable for a BLP (like this blog). I will be going through and removing those refs and unsupported content. JoelleJay (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
 * No, I was not aware. Thank you for informing me. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Holly Glasser for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holly Glasser is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holly Glasser until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CUPIDICAE💕 15:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Katelyn Clampett
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Katelyn Clampett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 08:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Abbyjjjj96. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gigi Gorgeous, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 16:41, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Just one more month left of Women in Red's Women in Africa contest
Thanks for signing up to Women in Red's Women in Africa contest. An update, now that we're two months in: over 100 articles have been created in January and February! Please help make the final month of the contest a success too :) Dsp13 (talk) 14:35, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Katelyn Clampett


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Katelyn Clampett".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 17:32, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nats Getty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nats Getty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nats Getty until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 23:28, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

April editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Fay Webb-Gardner
The article on Fay Webb-Gardner may interest you. It was just created earlier this month and is in need of some good attention. -Indy beetle (talk) 08:49, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I will check it out! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Nice work
Thanks from Women in Red Victuallers (talk) 11:06, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Debutante Cotillion and Christmas Ball of Durham


The article Debutante Cotillion and Christmas Ball of Durham has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails the notability criteria for an event, especially WP:GEOSCOPE. Only secondary source is a local magazine (not in-depth coverage)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 00:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ivy Getty
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ivy Getty, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emma Manners, Duchess of Rutland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinnaird Castle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Catherine Maxwell Stuart, 21st Lady of Traquair
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16
The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021 .--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 03:01, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021 at Women in Red
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Cueva de las Manos Look over
Hi! Are you okay with looking over an article I've worked on: Cueva de las Manos? The Wikiproject monuments page doesn't seem to be active and I was wondering if you were interested. Thanks! Tyrone Madera (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Durham Debutante Society Logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Durham Debutante Society Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Fake Austrian nobility titles
Dear Willthacheerleader18

Can you please clarify why you reversed my edit of the wikipage of Alexander_Tschugguel?

Someone (I hope, not he himself?) keeps refering to him as a "Baron" and such, for which there is no source (I dare you to provide one!) and which is absolute nonsense because there is no contempory Austrian nobility. There cannot be. It has been abolished. By federal law. Please refer to the talk page for a explanation if you need it.

I and others have pointed this out repeatetly and even referenced the federal law in which nobility was abolished and the wielding of titles made punishable in the discussion page of this article. Seeing that you refer to yourself as Swiss, I assume you understand German and that you are able to read the orginial reference. There was even a brief explanation in the article history, so I assume it was intentional. Somewhat ironical, the law in question was even referenced in the original version as to say "Here is a source that proves that the previous sentence is factually incorrect".

So why did you reverse the edit? If you are convinced of his nobility, I challenge you to provide an explanation with sources that provide a legal basis for his titles (or a reference where he calls himself "Baron")or otherwise accept the edit.

P.S.: Please note that the acceptance of fake nobility is a political act as it questions the Austrian republic. Clearly, this is inappropriate for the wikipedia. Also I am not sure if you are in-partial to this issue given that you are clearly very fond of nobility articles. Nothing wrong with that in general - this just happens to be the wrong category.

Bonfineberer (talk) 15:30, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Redirects
If a name is worth including in the lead, it's probably worth making a redirect from it: I've created both Philip Cottington Ludwell III and Philip Cottington Ludwell to point to the two of them. Helps the reader who has the full name, and without the redirect some future careless editor might accidentally create a duplicate. Thanks. Pam D  19:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Anna von Wattenwyl
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Concepción Cochrane Blaquier for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Concepción Cochrane Blaquier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Concepción Cochrane Blaquier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 00:04, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Sierra Leonean Jews


A tag has been placed on Category:Sierra Leonean Jews indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 14:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent edits piping Categories...
I don't understand why these were changed, so maybe you can help me understand. Examples are this edit to George Washington Custis Lee where you changed and this edit where you changed -  to Henry Lee I. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 17:21, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Shearonink, I am trying to alphabetize the category by given names to make it more easy to navigate. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok....but when I click on these piped Categories it just takes me to the main Cat page...isn't the html ignoring that pipe to a specific sub-name? I confess, am still confused. Shearonink (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * No, it recategorizes them by first name instead of last name, so that they are no longer all in the "L" column. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * AH! So doing the piping in this fashion gets them in alphabetical order by first name, overriding the built-in order by last name. Brilliant! It's just being done "under the hood" in a fashion, slotting the article into the Cat page in an editor's chosen order. Thanks for the explanation, I'll remember that. Very useful for these huge family cats... Shearonink (talk) 18:05, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Donna Cori Gibson for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donna Cori Gibson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Donna Cori Gibson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 23:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Reya Benitez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Reya Benitez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Reya Benitez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 23:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Noor Pahlavi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noor Pahlavi, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Noor Pahlavi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

WIR nom!

 * nice work Victuallers (talk) 16:42, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Lynn Forney Young
You've indicated that she's a member of the United Daughters of the Confederacy, but I don't see a source for that in her article. Where'd you get the info? —C.Fred (talk) 19:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It's already sourced in her article. Look here -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 19:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Mary Custis Lee
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

August Editathons with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In der Maur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tanner.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Santa Monica High School, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 00:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Howard Krein for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howard Krein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Howard Krein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 17:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robert Scothrup Lee


The article Robert Scothrup Lee has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No indication of being notable. Private in the army and JP are not sufficient to pass WP:NPOLITICIAN nor WP:SOLDIER. Just an indivual. Refs are atrocious."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  scope_creep Talk  09:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Milana Abensberg und Traun for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Milana Abensberg und Traun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Milana Abensberg und Traun until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:31, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ruby Guest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruby Guest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ruby Guest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 23:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Category:Stewart family has been nominated for renaming
Category:Stewart family has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 01:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Nikolai von Bismarck for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikolai von Bismarck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nikolai von Bismarck until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hemiauchenia (talk) 05:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ginevra Csillaghy Fürstenberg for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ginevra Csillaghy Fürstenberg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ginevra Csillaghy Fürstenberg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:31, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Von Eschenbach family


A tag has been placed on Category:Von Eschenbach family indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk  16:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steve Breedlove, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rector.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Thilo von Westernhagen


The article Thilo von Westernhagen has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "fails WP:MUSICBIO"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sikonmina (talk) 04:37, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Zelda Fitzgerald under FA review
I have nominated Zelda Fitzgerald for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. As you edited this article in the past, your input there and further contributions to the article would be appreciated. — Flask (talk) 01:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:54, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red
Just a quick word from me, Willthacheerleader18, to thank you for creating so many interesting articles about women since you joined about three years ago. Your efforts represent a significant contribution to our efforts to chip away at the gender gap. Keep up the good work and let me know if ever I can be of any assistance.--Ipigott (talk) 16:03, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for the acknowledgment, I appreciate it! I absolutely will! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:21, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

LA Rams male cheerleaders
I was a Los Angeles Rams Cheerleader in the early 1980’s along side 16 other guys. I was on a LA Rams Cheerleader Poster poster and pictured in the LA Rams game football program. I danced and performed along side the the lady’s on the squad during halftime shows. Why was this never mentioned in any of the articles of new male LA Rams Cheerleaders? 2600:8802:400C:6500:152F:78A8:7A80:F8E8 (talk) 10:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Alexandra Tegleva
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

March editathons
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Schönborn
To my understanding, all nobility titles in Austria became illegal in 1919. She was born in 1920, so I'd conclude: none of these Freiin - Baroness things were still valid. I'm tired, may look tomorrow. I just wrote about Ladislaja Harnoncourt who was born early enough to be born with titles ;) - and still a comment in the DYK review mentions nobility fancruft. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia Horvath for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Horvath is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Julia Horvath until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Teemu.cod (talk) 12:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Lady Eliza Manners for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lady Eliza Manners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Lady Eliza Manners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pilaz (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Alexey Vasilievich Teglev moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Alexey Vasilievich Teglev, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  scope_creep Talk  00:22, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

De Silva family
Hi Willthacheerleader18, How are you doing? I see you created Category:De Silva family. However, I can't see the relationship between some of the members. For example, How A. E. de Silva is related to George E. de Silva? If you have a source kindly share? Cheers-- <b style="color: SteelBlue;">Chanaka L</b> ( talk ) 03:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited In der Maur, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Master of the hunt and Birnstiel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard Neville, 11th Baron Braybrooke& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pilaz (talk) 06:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Marie Angliviel de la Beaumelle


The article Marie Angliviel de la Beaumelle has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The subject does not appear particularly notable. This is only made worse by the dodgy-looking sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

April Editathons from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Daughters of knights has been nominated for deletion
Category:Daughters of knights has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Reywas92Talk 23:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

"Elizabeth MacLeod Sturges Leggett" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Elizabeth MacLeod Sturges Leggett and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 13:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Mallory McMorrow
Thanks for your solid expansion work on that article from a few days ago. I finished off the five-fold expansion so you're a co-nominator for the DYK! (BTW, ever consider setting up talk page archiving?) – Muboshgu (talk) 23:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:National Hockey League Ice Dancers


A tag has been placed on Category:National Hockey League Ice Dancers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 18:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Mallory McMorrow
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

June events from Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Conflict of interest policy
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Hipal (talk) 22:07, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in July 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Proposed deletion of Thomas van Straubenzee


The article Thomas van Straubenzee has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No *significant* coverage in reliable sources. The few non-primary sources included in the article are articles about the royal family not about van Straubenzee himself."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ITBF (talk) 13:07, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gaïa Jacquet-Matisse for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaïa Jacquet-Matisse, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Gaïa Jacquet-Matisse until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Kyra Kennedy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyra Kennedy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Kyra Kennedy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Alexey Vasilievich Teglev
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Alexey Vasilievich Teglev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in September 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your draft article, Draft:Alexey Vasilievich Teglev


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Alexey Vasilievich Teglev".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 00:25, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Princess Marie des Neiges of Bourbon-Parma
Thank you for creating Princess Marie des Neiges of Bourbon-Parma. You have created many articles, please address the Naked URL]s on this article any any others. Other editors might not do this for you. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Duke of Castro
Check the pages of the suitors of the House of Bourbon Two Sicilies of the Spanish branch and search on the web. If you search you will see that the titles of the daughters are false, because they are already assigned to someone. Check it out for yourself.--User:MariaAmaliaduchessadiParma — Preceding undated comment added 18:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Felix Indermaur moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Felix Indermaur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself.  Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 13:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Lucy de László
Valereee (talk · contribs) 12:02, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

thank you, that's a nice companion for TFA Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56, - third time went well --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Jennie Hallam-Peel moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jennie Hallam-Peel, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 18:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red November 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Princess Victoria Romanovna for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Princess Victoria Romanovna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Princess Victoria Romanovna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 15:11, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Kathleen Buhle. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;    (contact)   01:49, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red in December 2022
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Sally Breedlove for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sally Breedlove is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sally Breedlove until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. UtoD 12:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Merchandise nomination
Hello! I just found out that the Wikimedia Foundation runs these giveaways, and I nominated you for one! I really admire the articles on royalty and society that you build and think they make great contributions to the encyclopaedia. Lajmmoore (talk) 14:03, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
 * @Lajmoore Oh my goodness, thank you so much for the nomination! this just made my day!! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:40, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Rose Montoya moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Rose Montoya, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. <b style="color:Green; font-family:Times New Roman">Hitro</b><b style="color:#FF00FF; font-family:courier; font-size:small"> talk</b> 06:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Rose Montoya moved to draftspace
Thanks for creating Rose Montoya. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because Issues raised by first reviewer were not addressed before another reviewer moved it back to mainspace.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 14:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Natalie Mars


A tag has been placed on Natalie Mars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Natalie Mars. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Judith Josa Duckworth. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   06:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Carole Radziwiłł
Hi, she is only Radziwiłł by marriage, the category should contain only people with that birth name Marcelus (talk) 18:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Is that common standard on Wikipedia? I have never known a family category to only include birth members in it. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Category:Buildings and structures by association has been nominated for renaming
Category:Buildings and structures by association has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Brían Nguyen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brían Nguyen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brían Nguyen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. --IWI (talk) 16:39, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Daisy Taylor for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daisy Taylor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daisy Taylor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. gnu 57 20:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Riley Knoxx moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Riley Knoxx, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. Right now, the only in-depth sourcing is about the NBA gig, which makes it a case of WP:BIO1E. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 15:56, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Vandalism warning
Hello, I'm 217.11.128.41. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#x20;to Anthony Radziwiłł have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks.

217.11.128.41 (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * LOL are you serious? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:38, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Olga Ilyinichna Ulyanova. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   03:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Mary Sadler moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mary Sadler, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 10:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Cheer extreme logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cheer extreme logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add permission pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --<span style="font-family: monospace, monospace; color:#69C;">Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 07:55, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Felix Indermaur
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Felix Indermaur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Pullen House moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Pullen House, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 10:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Queen's Bath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kuai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Jennie Hallam-Peel
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jennie Hallam-Peel, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category
Hey! I hadn't seen that other incident of cyberbullying in my quick skim of the article to see if the category is warranted, thanks for catching that for me. Also, I know the conversation is over 4 years old, however I noticed in the section "References to LDS Church name change reverted" above I noticed that you stated "but gives no teaching on what those outside the Church are supposed to do". The reasoning is while the Church provides guidance to its members, we believe that we are not authorized to provide guidance for others who are not in the Church, but we can encourage the guidance suggested to us for others. If this doesn't make sense I'm sorry I'm not good at explaining these things ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 16:27, 27 March 2023 (UTC)

"Notable dancers" section on Kansas City Ballet wikipedia article?
Noted your addition of this section on the KCB wikipedia article and the link to the article on Ms. Mayfield. I reviewed her article. While she certainly has had an interesting career, from a Kansas City Ballet perspective I'm not sure having danced in the corps equates to "notable."

KCB actually maintains an "alumni" website (see https://kcballet.org/alumni/ ), there is one former dancer on the list with the first name "Maryhelen." Last name Hanson, perhaps her maiden name? The alumni list contains nearly 600 names! There are probably a few "notables" on the list but having just one name on the list seems inappropriate. I would propose we remove this section/link until such time as the current KCB artistic leadership has time to review and weight in on this subject. Ontomeister (talk) 22:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, Hanson is her maiden name. I forgot to add that to her article. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 01:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Great! I'll contact the KCB webmaster and see if they want to link her name in the alumni list to the wikipedia article.  I'll also reach out to the KCB Artistic Director Devon Carney and get his take on the concept of a notable section. Ontomeister (talk) 01:32, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Sounds good! Please keep me updated. Are you part of WikiDance? I am but I saw the project went inactive. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 02:09, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Os Bandeirantes moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Os Bandeirantes, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 10:30, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey
Love the work you've done on Women in Red, it's a passion of mine as well. It's clear you are a valuable contributor. We encountered each other before regarding my perhaps overzealous deletion proposals for some of your church articles.

I wanted to make sure you are aware of WP:COI and ask if you have any conflicts of interest with articles you have created or worked on that should be disclosed? You can place the  template on any affected pages.

As I see it this is a small matter and nothing that needs a big production made over it, or report to WP:COIN. It would be better for you to place the tags yourself, if it is accurate. If it is inaccurate, I apologize and again thank you for your work on WIR. —DIYeditor (talk) 19:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello again! Thank you, Women in Red is one of my greatest passions. I actually did not know how to declare a conflict of interest. I did start an article on one of my siblings (Katherine Indermaur), and then on a few ancestors.. (I'm not sure if ancestors are conflict of interest or not? One is Thomas Lygon. I also wrote most of the article In der Maur. A lot of my personal time is spent going through family archives, and I like to use that where I can to expand articles. Are distant relations/ancestors off limits? Even in my sister's article, I do my best to come across neutral and only present the facts.) so I will go disclose that now. Do I place this tag on the article itself or on the talk page? Thank you for clarifying this for me! I'm sorry for any misstep on my part. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 23:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * It goes on the article talk page (instructions at Template:Connected contributor).
 * As to how close of a connection, Any external relationship—personal, religious, political, academic, legal, or financial (including holding a cryptocurrency)—can trigger a COI. How close the relationship needs to be before it becomes a concern on Wikipedia is governed by common sense. For example, an article about a band should not be written by the band's manager, and a biography should not be an autobiography or written by the subject's spouse. There can be a COI when writing on behalf of a competitor or opponent of the page subject, just as there is when writing on behalf of the page subject. As far as I'm concerned it's no problem for you to edit articles about ancient ancestors if the COI is disclosed, but I am not an expert in this topic. You could ask at WP:COIN if you wanted.
 * I think one of your church articles may have a COI as well. Thanks for you attention to this and happy editing! —DIYeditor (talk) 00:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willie Person Mangum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardscrabble.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Fram (talk) 07:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:BLPCRIME: "For individuals who are not public figures; that is, individuals not covered by § Public figures, editors must seriously consider not including material—in any article—that suggests the person has committed, or is accused of having committed, a crime, unless a conviction has been secured." Fram (talk) 07:49, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

And this was just a blatant, unacceptable BLP violation. Do NOT accuse people of being criminals when they are only charged or arrested, but not convicted. Fram (talk) 07:51, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * This was not an attack article. I've been writing articles on Wikipedia for over ten years and I have never once been accused of such before. I believed the subject notable, as a socialite who was arrested and charged as was cited in the article. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 07:57, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * You labeled her literally a criminal in multiple articles, without any conviction (just arrest and charges). I hope you haven't been doing that for over 10 years either. Fram (talk) 08:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * A misunderstanding, as I did not realize that is a BLP violation. And while I welcome any critique on editing that is not constructive or beneficial to Wikipedia, I will say I do not at all appreciate your attitude and tone. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 08:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * As I said above, I believe you are a well intentioned, constructive, and good faith editor. You probably simply have not run into these larger policy issues (BLPCRIME, COI, RSNP). Still, all three are issues that will raise the hackles of experienced editors and many will find it surprising that one didn't know of them, or feel that one should have known of them intuitively. People will become confrontational over such issues pretty quickly. —DIYeditor (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Do not use tabloid-quality sources to write articles about people suspected of crime. See WP:RSNP for some of the sources you used (like Sportskeeda). —Kusma (talk) 10:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I was not aware, thank you! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jennie Hallam-Peel


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Jennie Hallam-Peel".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:37, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Beccaynr (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Bigna Francis-von Wyttenbach moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bigna Francis-von Wyttenbach, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 11:25, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Margaret Severin-Hansen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Weiss.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Patrice E. Jones moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Patrice E. Jones, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 11:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Tisch Jones moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Tisch Jones, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  <i style="color:blue">TT me</i> 11:30, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination for deletion of Template:Bulgarian princesses by marriage
Template:Bulgarian princesses by marriage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DrKay (talk) 16:24, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Matilda Simon, 3rd Baron Simon of Wythenshawe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thepeerage.com is deprecated; also see WP:SWYRT ミラP@Miraclepine 17:03, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Altherton family


A tag has been placed on Category:Altherton family indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 03:13, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vestera family


A tag has been placed on Category:Vestera family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 04:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Clementine Krauss. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   15:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Jeanne de Montagnac. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   16:15, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Princess Nora zu Oettingen-Spielberg. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   06:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Lord Max Percy. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   07:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Nothando Hlophe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nothando Hlophe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nothando Hlophe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Oaktree b (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Riley Knoxx
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Riley Knoxx, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Kathleen Buhle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathleen Buhle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kathleen Buhle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Zaathras (talk) 00:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jonathan Melton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Melton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jonathan Melton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sandy Georgia (Talk)  22:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Heartstopper
Thanks for starting Kizzy Edgell! I was going to work on it tomorrow! Coincidentally, I expanded Tobie Donovan from a redirect and started an article on Wasia Project and Adiescar Chase. TJMSmith (talk) 03:23, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kylan Darnell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kylan Darnell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kylan Darnell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. <b style="color: #AB2B2B;">{ [ ( jjj</b> <b style="color: #000000;">1238 ) ] }</b> 21:45, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mary Sadler
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Sadler, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pullen House
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pullen House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pullen House has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Pullen House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Pullen_House help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:44, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Riley Knoxx


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Riley Knoxx".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 15:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:President Generals of the Daughters of the American Revolution
Hello, Willthacheerleader18,

We don't create category redirects like article redirects. Please look at the code on this page so should you need to make a category redirect in the future, you'll know the correct wikicode to use. Thank you. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 04:07, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you!! -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 21:35, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

The Countess (trans woman)
Hey. I was wondering if you had additional sources for The Countess (trans woman)? Right now its citations are to two book reviews and a Twitter thread, the latter of which isn't really a reliable source and also makes assumptions about gender identity that aren't supported by the other source (and make the (trans woman) disambiguation, and the pronouns used, at odds with the reliable source.) Beyond that, I'm concerned it doesn't meet notability standards on the basis of the sourcing provided. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 19:21, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

A simple question
Are your recent edits (e.g. ) to the Immaculate Conception Catholic Church (Durham, North Carolina) article being made in compliance with Conflict of interest guidelines? AndyTheGrump (talk) 03:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I believe so..? That's why I stated in the edit summary that a conversation should take place first between editors before such a large and well-cited section is removed. The news about incident between the school and Durham politicians was in the national news. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 11:39, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi Willthacheerleader18 - I was also coming here to talk to you about the COI guidance. I actually wondered whether you were aware of the existence of the guidance - please can I ask you to confirm that you have read it, particularly the parts about the requirement that you disclose your conflicts of interest when making edits about subjects that you are personally connected to. You do not appear to have email enabled, so I can't reach out to you privately about this, but there is some discussion of your editing taking place on another website (I'm not going to post a link to it here), and what I have read there does give me concerns. If you would like more detail about that, you would be welcome to e-mail me directly (you'll need to enable email to do this). Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  12:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hello! Yes, I have read them (not initially but was pointed to them by another editor after writing the article Immaculate Conception Catholic Church (Durham, North Carolina)) and I already declared my connection to the church on the article's talk page after writing the article. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Is that the only article you have ever edited that you have a personal connection to? The off-wiki discussion would seem to suggest that there are more, but I do not see any 'connected contributor' templates on the talk pages of those articles. Also, do you not also think that, since you have disclosed a conflict of interest with regards to that particular article, you ought to be using the talk page to propose changes rather than reverting other editors on it directly? Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  12:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * No, I have declared myself as personally connected on a few talk pages after I was made aware of COI policy here and here. This was actually discussed further up on my talk page (which is a bit of a mess, sorry) with (I tried to link that discussion down here but am not sure how to). Yes, I should not have used the reversion template as a discussion, and should have used the talk page initially. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * If those are the only people that you have written about with whom you have a personal connection, then you have satisfied that part of the guideline's recommendation. I see a number of other articles on your userpage about people with the same surname as those two, but that may be a coincidence and they are not related. Do also note, however, that the COI guidance strongly discourages you from editing such articles directly; these series of edits seems innocuous enough, but it would probably have been better to handle it through an edit request. Now, I see that your recent revert to Immaculate Conception Catholic Church (Durham, North Carolina) has been reverted - please do not reinstate it again, you can discuss the matter on the article's talk page but you should allow editors who do not have a COI to determine whether or not the content should be reinstated. Best wishes. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  13:23, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, by the way, you can link to a particular section of a talk page using the hash character. I did a Ctrl+F to find the discussion with DIYeditor, and I was going to tell you that you could like to it like this: User talk:Willthacheerleader18. Annoyingly though, that doesn't work since there's another section on this page with the same title to the browser just takes you to the first one. You could consider archiving this page - there's instructions for that at WP:ARCHIVE, but I'm afraid I am not an expert at setting it up (a very helpful person set mine up for me many years ago). Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  13:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * In User_talk:Willthacheerleader18 (this link is ambiguous, Willthacheerleader18 should set up archiving) I was trying to be moderate in admonishing you about COI. I think you do have a COI on some of these articles and should be careful about editing them. —DIYeditor (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I've been looking into this a bit more. You've recently made this series of edits and [this one]. Do you believe that those were made in compliance with WP:COI (and potentially WP:PAID)? Look, you've been very open so far, and I'm not trying to give you a hard time here or accuse you of deliberate malfeasance - you just need to be more careful in this area. If you choose to edit in areas where you have a personal or professional connection, you need to disclose that, every time. I hope that makes sense. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  14:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes, there are many articles with the same surname (Indermaur/In der Maur/ von Indermaur, etc.) But the closest relationship to any of them that I am aware of, besides the two which I already disclosed, is a fourth cousin twice-removed that I have never met. And I only know of that relation by our family tree records, not because I've ever had any contact with said person (Robert Indermaur). It's a large, old family and I am not personally connected to any besides the two previously mentioned. I am a part of WikiProject Switzerland so I was excited to write and expand coverage on Swiss people. I understand, and I will not make edits like those linked above again. Am I still allowed to make edits to other Indermaur articles that I have no personal connection to? I understand regarding ICCC as well. Thank you for the additional information on linking the discussion and archiving, I believe it is time for me to archive my talk page as I don't think I ever have before. I will look into that. Addressing your next point, no worries I understand that you are doing your job and want to be as diligent as possible. No, I do not believe that the edits I made to the Suicide of Tyler Clementi and Brian Sims are WP:COI and they absolutely were not WP:PAID— I have never recieved compensation for my writing and editing on Wikipedia nor would I ever accept it. My only connection there is that I began working for the foundation named after Tyler Clementi last Monday as an administrative assistant. I got an email that was sent out to all members of the foundation, that Brian Sims (a celebrity and LGBTQ+ advocate that, as a transgender woman, I have been following for quite some time) had joined the foundation's board of directors. It was also added to the foundation's website. Upon seeing that I, excitedly, added it to Wikipedia seeing as the article already listed other celebrities who had been affiliated with the foundation. I would not have thought that to be a WP:COI otherwise I would have disclosed it. Is that a violation of WP:COI? I have never met Sims nor was I instructed to do anything on Wikipedia. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Well speaking for myself, if a famous person were to be appointed as a governor at the school where I work, I would consider myself to be too closely connected with the subject to either record the fact at the article about my school, or to edit the article about the famous person; I'd leave that for someone else to do. Use your best judgment, but if in doubt, leave it to someone else or at least declare the connection when making the edit.
 * The stuff about distant family members is probably fine - if you don't know them personally, don't worry about it. Your openness about the ones you are connected to does you credit, and it goes a long way to convince me that there is no attempt on your part to do anything improperly. Best Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  15:48, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * That makes sense, I think that's a good rule of thumb for me to use moving forward in my editing. I apologize for any inconvenience that I've caused, and I will re-read through the WP:COI if I'm in doubt and see if it's something I can ask another editor to do instead. I wouldn't need to declare my connection when editing a page on, for example, my alma mater or the city I grew up in though, right? I feel like those are far enough removed institutions for it not to be considered a conflict of interest? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 00:15, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi. I've been watching this conversation, so hope you don't mind if I jump in here with some examples which might help answer your question.  I mostly write about the history of the Bronx, which is where I live.  I don't feel the need to declare a COI for most topics that I edit.  I did, however, for Harlem Yacht Club, because I'm a member of the club. RoySmith (talk) 01:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with Roy on this. Writing about the city where you live - sure, no problem at all, loads of people do stuff like that. Writing about your alma mater? Not a problem in the general sense, but it would start to get a bit nearer the knuckle if you were to write about the department where you studied, and I would certainly suggest staying away from people like professors who taught you, or people you were in classes with you who went on to become famous/notable. Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  13:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julia Livingston Delafield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fieldston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Jane Norton Grew. User:Loriendrew, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  20:42, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * please see WP:paywall RoySmith-Mobile (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * My comment was a suggestion to add some non-paywalled sources. The article was still positively reviewed and curated.-- ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  21:43, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Jinny Widowski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jinny Widowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jinny Widowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Reywas92Talk 15:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Sylvia Swayne for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sylvia Swayne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sylvia Swayne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Adelphia Plantation


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Adelphia Plantation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 03:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Izza (singer) moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Izza (singer). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Oaktree b (talk) 01:16, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Felix Indermaur


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Felix Indermaur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 16:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Pullen House. User:JackFromWisconsin, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JackFromWisconsin (talk &#124; contribs) 14:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Känel family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Känel family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:De Muralt family has been nominated for deletion
Category:De Muralt family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Frisching family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Frisching family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Del Ponte family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Del Ponte family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:54, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Röist family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Röist family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 13:55, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Schulthess family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Schulthess family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Brawand family has been nominated for merging
Category:Brawand family has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 14:02, 7 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Sommaruga family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Sommaruga family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 12:26, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Roger family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Roger family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:30, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Grimoard family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Grimoard family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Van de Weyer family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Van de Weyer family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Wilson family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Wilson family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Waller-Bridge family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Waller-Bridge family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Gualthérie van Weezel has been nominated for deletion
Category:Gualthérie van Weezel has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Beaton family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Beaton family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:De Chair family has been nominated for deletion
Category:De Chair family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Lee family of Alabama has been nominated for deletion
Category:Lee family of Alabama has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Macarty family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Macarty family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Morehead family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Morehead family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Parsley family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Parsley family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Resor family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Resor family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Ravenel family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Ravenel family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Siegel family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Siegel family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:30, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Spelling family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Spelling family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Oelrichs family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Oelrichs family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Bragg family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Bragg family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:33, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Booth family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Booth family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:34, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Doughton family residences has been nominated for merging
Category:Doughton family residences has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Peterson family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Peterson family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Brimley family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Brimley family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Wives of younger sons of peers and Category:Wives of knights have been nominated for discussion
Category:Wives of younger sons of peers and Category:Wives of knights have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether these proposals comply with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the categorys' entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Goodlett family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Goodlett family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:50, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Fuller family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Fuller family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:01, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Austerlitz family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Austerlitz family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Lanigan-O& has been nominated for deletion
Category:Lanigan-O& has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Teglev family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Teglev family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:15, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Simon of Glaisdale family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Simon of Glaisdale family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Stewart family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Stewart family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:57, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Hodges family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Hodges family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:36, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Stone family (North Carolina) has been nominated for deletion
Category:Stone family (North Carolina) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:28, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Hoey family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Hoey family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:53, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bigna Francis-von Wyttenbach
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bigna Francis-von Wyttenbach, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Abercron family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Abercron family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Von Rad family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Von Rad family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:36, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Patrice E. Jones
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Patrice E. Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Adelphia Plantation. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   01:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Von Doblhoff has been nominated for deletion
Category:Von Doblhoff has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Vetsera family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Vetsera family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Engerth family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Engerth family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Zeitschel family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Zeitschel family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 04:07, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Nasi family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Nasi family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:57, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Csillaghy family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Csillaghy family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:33, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Laroche family has been nominated for merging
Category:Laroche family has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:40, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Bleichröder family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Bleichröder family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Evangelical churches in Kansas


A tag has been placed on Category:Evangelical churches in Kansas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 02:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sylvia Swayne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Runoff.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tisch Jones


Hello, Willthacheerleader18. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tisch Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit  14:21, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:American Jews from Mississippi


A tag has been placed on Category:American Jews from Mississippi indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗ plicit  15:03, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Margaret French McLean. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   05:12, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Holden family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Holden family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:10, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Willthacheerleader18. Thank you for your work on Leo-Ferdinand Henckel von Donnersmarck. User:Seawolf35, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Seawolf35 <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">T--C 01:46, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:42, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hi Willthacheerleader18, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! –&#8239;Joe (talk) 10:19, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * I am afraid that I have removed the "autopatrolled user" right because you have created dozens of new pages that have been deleted, so keeping them from being easily reviewed doesn't seem wise. -- 23:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC) BCorr &#124; Брайен 23:33, 22 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Category:Du Barry family has been nominated for deletion
Category:Du Barry family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 21:27, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:De Saint Phalle family has been nominated for deletion
Category:De Saint Phalle family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:De Romanet family has been nominated for deletion
Category:De Romanet family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:De Montagnac family has been nominated for deletion
Category:De Montagnac family has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:20, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Princess Marie Gabrielle de Lobkowicz


The article Princess Marie Gabrielle de Lobkowicz has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, none of the sources are about her (at best she gets a passing mention), and nothing in the article suggests that she has actually been in the spotlight at any time, instead seemingly avoiding all publicity."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Loyse de Pury


The article Loyse de Pury has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sources are either not independent, not reliable, or not indepth (everything else, basically). Fails WP:BIO."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:36, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Loyse de Pury for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loyse de Pury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Loyse de Pury until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fram (talk) 15:49, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Naomi Biden
Hi, If you have time, can you check recent edits to the above account? Thanks Denisarona (talk) 08:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Ologashevillenc.JPG


The file File:Ologashevillenc.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused image, there is no freedom of panorama for 3D artwork in the US."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 11:00, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Nomination of Laurie Buckhout for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurie Buckhout, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Laurie Buckhout until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anna Watson (cheerleader)


The article Anna Watson (cheerleader) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I imagine that a story of a bodybuilding college cheerleader got some attention from blogs in 2012 but there has been no sustained coverage of this article subject. Looks like momentary notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 07:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Category:Portrayals of the Virgin Mary in film has been nominated for renaming
Category:Portrayals of the Virgin Mary in film has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas van Straubenzee


The article Thomas van Straubenzee has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No real evidence this individual meets criteria of WP:NBIO. Being a godfather to a royal does not confer notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 14:37, 7 February 2024 (UTC)