User talk:Willygofar

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Canterbury
Please do not strip out valid parts of an article like you did with HMNZS Canterbury (F421). Most certainly not without an edit summary explaining your reasons, and references to back up the changed claims. Thank you and happy editing. Ingolfson (talk) 04:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I have deleted your recent changes again. Please provide references (Wikipedia needs to be verifiable) and edit summaries (this is a community project, so we need to talk to each other if we disagree). Ingolfson (talk) 10:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi Willygofar and welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted your persistent edit because it is controversial and needs to be discussed first on the article's talk page. If you look at the tabs at the top left of any article, you will see a tab labelled "discussion". If you click on this it will take you to the article's talk page. This is the place where you discuss any edits that are likely to be controversial. So go here, click on "edit this page" and then set out your concerns. Cheers. --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:58, 20 March 2008 (UTC)


 * "You do not have the authority to include wrong press statements..." shows that you do not understand Wikipedia. "My" claims are supported by newspapers. "Your" removals are supported by... what? Provide references for the changes please, otherwise Wikipedia will stick with publicised sources. They may be wrong, but that is better than simply agreeing with anyone who wants to have something changed in an article because he says its wrong, and he knows it! Nothing personal, but that's the rules, and they exist for good reasons. If it is important to you that something you consider wrong is changed, please dig up something verifiable to back your claims. Ingolfson (talk) 04:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Canterbury
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Ingolfson (talk) 08:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I see you have again removed references, arguing misconduct on the case of the person whose references to you removed. In such a case, the burden of proof is SQUARELY on you. No references, no removal (we do not need the references in the article itself, but you will have to prove it before its acceptable to be removed). Ingolfson (talk) 06:30, 19 July 2009 (UTC)