User talk:Willywill3x

Sandbox
Hi! I've noticed that you seem to have started an article in the WP:Sandbox and on your userpage. I'm not sure if you've tried using your personal sandbox or perhaps draftspace if you'd like to create an article. Happy editing! Me, Myself &#38; I (☮) (talk) 01:29, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of David Earl Williams III for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Earl Williams III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/David Earl Williams III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 04:05, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

As a public figure the page of David earl Williams III should not be deleted as he is a candidate for and known figure. He has been involved in 2 federal congressional races as all proper citations are in place to prove so. Willywill3x (talk) 04:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Repost of David Earl Williams III
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. JamesG5 (talk) 21:23, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Willywill3x. Thank you. JamesG5 (talk) 17:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)