User talk:Willywonka888888

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rape of males has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rape of males was changed by Willywonka888888 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874264 on 2020-10-22T20:52:41+00:00

Welcome!
Hello, Willywonka888888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Rape of males did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. FeRDNYC (talk) 01:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
 * In particular, Wikipedia — both as a compendium of encyclopedic content, and as a community of volunteer editors guided by shared principles (those five pillars mentioned above) ­— has a bias (and an official policy) against any content being added to articles that constitutes original research, often just referred to by the shorthand WP:OR. Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought, nor a soapbox, nor a blog or social media site.
 * So, it's not in any way a matter how correct or valid your contribution may have been. I certainly agreed with everything you wrote, personally. (But that's not the point, is the point.) As an unreferenced, un-supported statement of what ultimately represent your personal views, it's just not the place. We don't editorialize in the main article namespace, no matter how much we've all been tempted to at one time or another. (Plenty of wikipedians have given in to that temptation, and fortunately we all have the rest of the community there to check our impulses.) -- FeRDNYC (talk) 02:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)