User talk:Wilshire01

Wilshire01, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

May 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lichfield Gospels has been reverted. Your edit here to Lichfield Gospels was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://viscenter.wordpress.com/2010/06/28/next-stop-for-vis-center-humanities-research-england-and-spain/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:39, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi !  We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

--

Lichfield Gospels
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lichfield_Gospels, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackstache (talk • contribs) 04:14, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lichfield_Gospels. Blackstache (talk) 22:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Blackstache, please read Wikipedia policy and guidelines on copyright and contributory copyright infringement. Also, in the history on the Lichfield Gospels page, I have given a link to the contract between Lichfield Cathedral and the University of Kentucky. It states that the Creative Commons Licensing is for images from digitising "the manuscripts." Not for other items. Wilshire01 (talk) 06:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Codex Totomixtlahuaca
hi there: I saw you had been editing this and since I don't know how/if you bookmarked it, I thought I'd let you know that I'm taking it off the cleanup-after-translation list, since the english is now fine. I'm going to put an expand-Spanish template on it because the es.wikipedia article is longer and presumably has more information (and sources). And thanks for working on it; imho Wikipedia needs more articles like this Elinruby (talk) 12:41, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Wilshire01! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 03:03, Friday, January 27, 2017 (UTC)

Notice
Your recent editing history at Lichfield Gospels shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Softlavender (talk) 08:12, 24 February 2017 (UTC)