User talk:Wimt/Archive/Apr-2008

Image
Hi. The user in question has been uploading much of the same collage over and over, and it was repeatedly deleted by administrators. Even in this collage, which he partly presented as his own work, he did not provide a rationale for using the Enescu picture - he claims that it is PD and that no author is acknowledged, by one of his variants was already deleted because of that Enescu picture and that failure to explain the inclusion. Dahn (talk) 08:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Response
In response to our conversation on IRC, I wasn't taking anything out on anyone. I was simply addressing the fact that every time I say something that seems moody, people try to make it sound stupid by doing exactly the opposite of what I said. You saw the diff from my talk. You may find it funny, but I regard it as unnecessary and point it out as such to get the message across that B.S. like this, I don't appreciate.

Again, see you in fifty years when either NotASpy dies or lightens up.  21 6 55  ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 20:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I didn't say I found it amusing, I did say I don't think he intended it to be offensive. As it is, I think this comment is completely needlessly inflammatory of you. Will (aka  Wimt  ) 20:24, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

'Nother response
Well, it didn't occur to me that lurking was still possible with a +b. Doesn't matter anyone, now that I've uninstalled Chatzilla and don't really plan on getting it again for obvious reasons.

As for his sense of humour, you're forgetting that in plain text, it's near-impossible to see the numour in the comment he made yesterday without any indication. Otherwise it would sound like a total flame, and it did. Therefore, my taking offense.

As for the "now ignoring thisuser" thing, I'll admit I didn't really know that. But now I do!

Fifty years: Huh, I was wondering why you deemed my message inflammatory and whatnot. The entire paragraph before was simply stating facts...

Leaving WP: Whaddareya, crazy?! After what happened in mid-March—and several days after my birthday, at that? No way, man, I'm sticking to wikibreaks.

Bottom line: Point taken, lesson learned. Sorry for coming across as though I thought you hated me. Never realized NAS's attitude was actually his sense of humour. That's plain-text chatting for you...  21 6 55  ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 15:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

PS: I remember two occasions in which I typed much more than you did, for exactly the opposite reason you stated. [shrugs]

The Point-One Cabal
If you haven't already any allegiance with any other cabals, you might want to check out my newly-formed cabal.  21 6 55  ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ? 19:43, 18 April 2008 (UTC)