User talk:Wimvandorst/archive07

File permission problem with File:Joel-Azara-2000.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Joel-Azara-2000.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 08:11, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 21:14, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 16:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:Lauri Vaska.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Lauri Vaska.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 09:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 17:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Whitby
Do you realise that the article is currently at GAR and your edits are inappropriate? The review has requested the lead be expanded not shrunk. Will you please return the article to the state it was in before your edits. Thank you.--J3Mrs (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * No, it is not. The GAR is on hold (see talk) and the article is listed on the GOCE wikipage with a request for copy-editing.  Wim van Dorst  (talk)  22:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC).


 * Hi Wim. Thank you for helping out on the Whitby article. However, there has been some confusion because you presented a Peer Review when the main contributors requested a copy-edit. The contributors then found your edits and advice conflicted with the advice within the GAN regarding the GA criteria related to WP:Lead. I feel your edits were done in good faith, though for future reference it would be preferable not to present your comments in a Peer Review format, and it would be useful to look at the nature of the request, and if a GAN is mentioned, to look at what the GAN reviewer has said to ensure there isn't a conflict of advice. If you find yourself disagreeing with the reviewer, it would be better to bring that up either on the GAN page, or directly with the reviewer. Editing and giving advice which contradicts that of the reviewer is going to create some distress with someone at some point! At this point it's all water under the bridge, and a typical Wikipedia storm in a tea-cup, but it does help to be made aware when one's actions are causing some confusion and distress so one can take steps in future to avoid drama. Keep well.  SilkTork   ✔Tea time  15:11, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * discussion continued on talk:Whitby.  Wim van Dorst  (talk)  07:29, 12 October 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 02:54, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of International Paint


A tag has been placed on International Paint requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 20:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of International Paint


The article International Paint has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 20:15, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about International Paint
Hello, Wimvandorst, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/International Paint whether the article International Paint should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving International Paint, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Sparthorse (talk) 16:23, 12 November 2011 (UTC)