User talk:WinchesterSid

Welcome!
Hello, WinchesterSid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Chhattisgarh have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. —Gazoth (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Please use meaningful edit summaries
Please use meaningful edit summaries. To describe a tendentious removal of sourced content as "Fixed a typo", as you did here and here, is highly misleading, and could be seen as deceptive. And the summary you use the most, "added content", is meaningless — it contains no information. Please see What to avoid in edit summaries: avoid misleading summaries and avoid vagueness. Bishonen &#124; talk 20:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC).

December 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Zero (2018 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. ''Diffs: We're not interested in editors' personal evaluations. If there is "severe criticism", you need to substantiate that, and we would use neutral phrasing, not hyperbolic language like "severe". Further, "negative and mixed" is not only unsourced, but it is absurd phrasing, since "mixed" already means "positive and negative". Similarly, phrasing like "mixed to negative" is widely shunned by multiple WikiProjects as being meaningless.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

May 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. &#x222F; WBG converse 10:51, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

January 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ronald Araújo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)