User talk:Windows95Fanatic1995

Welcome!
Hello, Windows95Fanatic1995, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Epic Movie did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Introduction to referencing
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:03, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Battlefield Earth (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Box-office bomb. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 05:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2023
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Avengers (1998 film) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  00:55, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Avengers (1998 film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Jalen Folf  (talk)  00:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to The Avengers (1998 film), you may be blocked from editing. Jalen Folf  (talk)  01:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Edit summary
This is mainly a request, but is there a way you can make your edit summaries more informative about your edits instead of just ""? This kind of edit summary can confuse other editors as it doesn't exactly inform them of what you did until they see the changes. Jalen Folf  (talk)  07:00, 11 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Again, despite my request here, you are still repeating the same message in your edit summary. Please stop doing this and consider being more informative about your edits in the edit summary. Jalen Folf   (talk)  05:13, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inadequate, inaccurate, or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  22:41, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. firefly ( t · c ) 14:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Just to add to the above - you have been warned on many occasions against inserting synthesis or content from your personal point of view. After NinjaRobotPirate's warning above you went on to make two such edits. In addition, every single one of your edits has the totally useless summary of I made this using a page editor, which tells other editors nothing about your change. You were asked about that in February and yet gave no response. On Wikipedia, communication is required. It's expected that we all explain why we make the edits we do, particularly if others may disagree, and also that we respond in a reasonably timely fashion to queries about our editing. Please bear this in mind when the block expires - if you continue editing as you have been, you risk being blocked indefinitely. firefly  ( t · c ) 14:07, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing.  Mike  Allen   16:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article.  Mike  Allen   15:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing all of the same unacceptable editing practices which led to the previous block. This block may be removed by any administrator if you post an unblock request which persuades them that you will not continue in the same unacceptable ways. The purpose of the block is not to prevent you from ever contributing to Wikipedia again, but to try to get you to respond to the concerns that have been expressed, since so far you have never shown any response at all. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. JBW (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)