User talk:Windsor1992

Dominic Foppoli
Hi welcome to wikipedia, I noticed your edits at Dominic Foppoli. Do you yourself perhaps have a connection to Foppoli? It's a bit hard to work out what is going on with the article so I've started a debate at Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard to get more editors involved. Mujinga (talk) 11:54, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours to prevent further disruptive removal of material. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Missvain (talk) 15:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023
Hello, Windsor1992. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Dominic Foppoli, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. RetroCosmos (talk) 11:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


 * the material on the page is factually inaccurate and purposely negative and demeaning. most of the "sources' are from tabloid style articles which I believe are supposed to be banned from us. the main photo is stolen and manipulated . How do I get this changed if I can't edit it? Windsor1992 (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * With respect, the san francisco chronicle does not appear to be a tabloid to me. If there is a specific source you object please list it RetroCosmos (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)