User talk:Winged Blades of Godric/Archive 11

Talk:Identitarian movement
Hi - you started to close the discussion on White supremacy here, do you still intend to close it? Doug Weller talk 13:39, 2 September 2017 (UTC)


 * --Thanks for reminding.Entirely forgot about the issue.Will be closing it within 2-3 days (once I get my hands on a PC):) Winged Blades Godric 03:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)  Winged Blades Godric  03:33, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Doug Weller  talk 12:54, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
 * --}✅.Again, regrets for the delay.Cheers:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 11:53, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Continuing...
Hi Godric, re: this query, if Brad-Pitt-fan or Obamaisgod wanted to edit those respective articles, there's no clear policy in place to sanction them from doing so just on the basis of their usernames. TrueInsan, per my reading of the username policy, does not appear to be a violation. If there's a specific part you'd like me to look at again, please tell me. If TrueInsan is directly related to the subject, and is deeply emotionally tied to the subject as a religious adherent might be, then they might be strongly discouraged from editing per our conflict of interest behavioral guidelines, but they are not de facto barred from editing so long as their edits don't contravene other policies. If they were writing about how fantastic Singh is or editorialising about his criminal conviction, they'd be violating our NPOV policies, which would be sanctionable. But so long as they're editing with integrity, there's not much to do administratively. Hope that helps, even if unsatisfying. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Moot as the editor is indefinitely blocked. Doug Weller  talk 12:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Yes
I was thinking that too. Got an itch in the old AfD finger eh? ;) :) &mdash;  fortuna  velut luna  18:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

For the most awesome username ever!
What the header says.

 Whispe ring  03:06, 6 September 2017 (UTC) 
 * --Thanks:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 11:51, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Hot Chicken Takeover
I disagree with your unilateral move to draft of this page, especially since I under an unfair editing restriction so I can't move it back. If you really don't like it, go to AfD. No one wis likely to improve it in Draft space. It's already not promotional and well referenced. Legacypac (talk) 16:42, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * --✅--Regards:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 13:04, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Rv WP:DAYS exemption guideline
Hi Godric, I noticed you reversed my edit regarding the DOY-guideline. You accompanied it with the comment I already addressed on my talk page to Deb about the issue...Any issues about my actions take to AN. Where can I find it? It is not on this talk page.Emiel (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Mill 1, thanks for stopping by! Please view the intended thread at my alt. acc. t/p at User talk:Godric on Leave.I have no opinions on the merit of the arguments, except that it's a bit extraordinary and given that the phrase change was executed in a perfect policy-based manner, it's time for you to regain a consensus via the RfC which will prob. settle the debate for a long long time.Regards:) Winged Blades Godric  09:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Pinging. Winged Blades Godric 09:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thx for the ping. Don't let my edit count fool you; I'm quite a novice in the field of project discussions. I must say this discussion (so far) has been an interesting experience indeed!

pp
It was just a short 30min protect to keep trolls away. You edited 30 seconds after the protect was lifted. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 16:35, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

--Phew! 30 seconds?! I sneaked in right after the protection ended! Anyway, keeping track of times (the edit history of any page is displayed in local time while logged actions are always in UTC!) from mobile devices is a bit troublesome.By the way, I feel that it's best to plain ignore and revert stray oppurtunistic comments.For an example take a look at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tensor product of representations (2nd nomination).Cheers:)  Winged Blades Godric  16:48, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Sidharth Slathia
Hi, just want to ask you that can we take Sidharth Slathia to AFD? It has been deleted several times in the past and seems to be a promotional stunt by a fan.-Umair Aj (talk) 09:38, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

00:21:57, 22 September 2017 review of submission by 65.152.183.234
I saw that this article was rejected for not having good enough sources, as detailed in the Notability (music) guidelines number 1. I agree with this judgment. However, the guidelines state the band "may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria" and criterion 6 does apply to the band "Mr Epp and the Calculations". Two of the members, Mark Arm and Steve Turner were later in the "notable" bands Mudhoney and Green River. I edited the links for Steve Turner and Green River so that they link properly to the specific musician and band articles instead of the more general listing of all articles about those names. This is my first time doing Any editing, so thank you for reading, and considering. 65.152.183.234 (talk) 00:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * WP:GNG trumps WP:SNG. Ultimate criterion is that whether it passes notability on it's own. The criterion were devised since most bands which passed which passes these criterion usually manages to clinch GNG. Regretably, this fails.Regards:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:55, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Hard to close?
Greetings Winged Blades! A few days ago you indicated that you intended to close Talk:Donald Trump, and the RfC has remained in a "pending close" state since then. Are you having trouble closing the discussion or did you just need more time? Or a gentle reminder? In any case, thanks for your diligent work handling so many close requests! — JFG talk 15:55, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * --Thanks for the reminder and your appreciation.Please see my reply to Melanie about the same issue at the t/p of my alt-acc. Winged Blades Godric  16:05, 22 September 2017 (UTC)


 * i.e. at User talk:Godric on Leave. Winged Blades Godric  16:06, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds great, thanks. And many good wishes for your intense studies! (My son just started on a similar path, so I can relate to what you're going through...) — JFG talk 16:09, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Heartfelt thanks:)Regards- Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:52, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hi WiBoG, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 22:35, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * --It was a pleasure to support your candidature. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 08:53, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

Alt-left
I find your attempts at closure on Talk:Alt-left to be inappropriate per WP:BADNAC #2. Please leave situations such as these to an administrator. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 15:19, 23 September 2017 (UTC)

---RMs, RFCs etc. can be closed by a non-admin irr. of the nature of the call.I will be posting the close within 4-5 hrs. of me writing this, sans any extra ordinary situation and you are obviously free to adress the merits of my close at here or at AN for any review (if necessary).As a rule of thumb, BADNAC is typically obeyed in closing XFDs et al.And personally I feel it is better to adress the close by it's merits rather than the nac suffix.Regards:)  Winged Blades Godric  10:11, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * I can't stop you, and I have no intentions to. I was merely stating my view and suggesting that you refrain. — nihlus kryik   ( talk ) 10:16, 26 September 2017 (UTC)


 * If you acknowledge that it's probably going to fall under WP:BADNAC, why are you still closing it? And why did you tag it as 'closing', then leave it in that state for two days, effectively preventing anyone else from closing it even though you lacked the time to do so yourself?  Closing tags aren't supposed to be used that way.  Please revert yourself and stop trying to close it; it just seems strange at this point, and (especially given the controversial nature of the topic and the close) it'd be much better to hold off until an admin can handle it. --Aquillion (talk) 12:05, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * In all sincerity, that was not a bad NAC. Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


 * --I have closed the disc.If you have any queries, feel free to approach:) Winged Blades of Godric On leave 16:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)