User talk:Wingwrong

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Comfort women are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. See these edits on 3 Sept and 9 Sept:, . Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Comfort women
Use the term "whore" again and I will ask for you to be blocked. "Whore" is offensive and absolutely unnecessary. Use the term prostitute or comfort women. Second, stop soap-boxing and trying to push your extremely fringe point of view or, again, I will ask that you be blocked. As I've told you before, you don't get to decide that one type of evidence is not good simply because you don't like it. That article is barely teetering on the edge of neutrality as it is...but the idea that there was no forced prostitution in Korea falls under Wikipedia's rules on fringe topics. It is a position that is not taken seriously by historians even in Japan, except for the most right wing nationalist black-van groups. Please confine yourself to suggestions for improving the article based upon what Wikipedia defines as reliable sources, or find a different website where you can discuss express your personal opinions on the subject. Qwyrxian (talk) 09:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm Japanese. Sorry, I don't know that "whore" is slang. I used "Google Translation". I care to never use it.Wingwrong (talk) 06:28, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I was a little strong--I should have realized you aren't a native English speaker. Thanks for understanding for the future.  Qwyrxian (talk) 06:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

I've just reverted your new edits there. Including any sort of interpretation of documents falls under what Wikipediia calls original research, which isn't allowed. Similarly, you can't take 2 different sources and put them together to imply something that neither of them says individually. Perhaps those sources might be useful, but not the way you pulled info from them. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:39, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
 * That blog is Sankei-Shinbun Official blog, and that article wrote by Rubi Abiru of Sankei-Shinbun's reporter.And there are just a few newspapers that wrote "force" in the world. Prior to that, Mr.Abe speak English? Who are translation to English ? Mr.Abe never said "force" and "sex slave". He always say only "comfort women". Don't be forge!Wingwrong (talk) 08:59, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

User page
Your user page is starting to cross the line towards WP:POLEMIC. We allow users a lot of freedom on their user page, but calling South Koreans enemies and trying to justify racism are a bit too much. Could you please consider removing some of the more extreme statements? Also, given your very very strong feelings, its probably best if you don't try to contribute to articles on Japanese politics, foreign relations, etc. (including Comfort women), because it sure seems like you can't do so neutrally. The last part is just a suggestion, not a requirement, but it's good to know when a certain topic is too personal to allow you to edit properly per WP:NPOV. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
 * icWingwrong (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for 24 hours for violating the article parole on Liancourt Rocks. Please see the special rules about reverting at the top of the talk page. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Your edits on Talk:Comfort women
Your edits on the "Comfort women" page are disruptive. Please stop. The talk page is not for your political arguments. Also, your English is too poor make meaningful contributions towards improving that page. If you can't speak English properly, you should not try to work on difficult topics like these.

If you continue with these kinds of edits, I will have to block you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive agenda editing promoting historical denialism on Comfort women. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The simple reason is this: blocks may be used to prevent disruption on Wikipedia. The fact that you have been told over and over again not to attempt to use Wikipedia as a platform for espousing your own views, in some sort of attempt to WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS is why you were blocked. As I've said before, it's pretty clear to me that your obsession with trying to insert the fringe Japanese nationalist position into articles about Japan, despite there not being support in mainstream sources, is a problem and, ultimately, is disruptive. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for answer. There is a newspaper article, there is also a Japanese official documents. Yet, No way, it was unexpected that had been considered "fringe". I do not want to think that Americans are all that's the case. But, I was disappointed. It's like a joke. It is blocked by that reason, it is impossible to present a legitimate article on Wikipedia.Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 15:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * All I can say is this: the best chance you have to remain unblocked after this one expires is to stop editing topics related to the Japanese politics, history, conflicts, etc. Try something else. If you want to continue to focus on Japan, try Japanese cities, pop culture, sports...something other than this topic. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I knew there is a much bigger problem in English Wikipedia. I cannot afford to worry about such a thing. Now we consider the means to raise the problem with the politicians or large organization.Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 02:21, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I guarantee you that if you keep trying to edit these same topics, and don't make a complete change in attitude, you will be blocked again. My guess is that the next time, you'll be blocked indefinitely. So, it's really up to you. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:42, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thank you for care. But I was really disappointed to Wikipedia. So, I do not write anymore for a while longer. I wanted to write more many things. But this is no longer equal to the agitation. They said to "WP:GAB" to me any number of times. But whether appropriate where the item, they did not teach me. But I do not think that I write and are also applicable to any of them. Then, I heard them any number of times. But they don't teach me finally. So future, I will be blocked for the same reason. So I never write when I know the reason.
 * Americans should learn from the Japanese Wikipedia. Also a disgrace for the Japanese, Japanese doesn't conceale. Your word was the most easy to understand. Thank you, and Goodbye. Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 13:44, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ウィキペディア日本語版は、日本中心になりがちです. それに、郷に入っては郷に従えっていう言葉もありますし、英語版ではローカルルールに従うべきです. Japanese Wikipedia usually has bias in favour of Japan. And You need to obey local rules in English Wikipedia. --水樹美月 (talk) 07:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * コメントありがとうございます. でも、私がブロックされた理由は「日本中心的だから」ではないですよね. アメリカ軍慰安婦のことを書いた韓国の新聞社の記事をトークページに張って、「この話題はここでいいのか？」と聞いただけでブロックされたわけですから. 「アメリカ人にとって不名誉な記事は真実であっても隠蔽する」というのがローカルルールだというのなら、従いましょう. Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 13:26, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
--  李博杰  &#124; —Talk contribs email 07:18, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent tendentious editing, especially for persistent offensive advocacy for denialism on Comfort women. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:06, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

AN notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 09:43, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Since you're blocked, you can't respond there directly, but if you want to add something to the discussion you can put it here and someone will copy it over for you. Qwyrxian (talk) 11:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The Japanese government has consistently denied that "comfort women were forced by the military." In fact, Korean never present Physical Evidence. That is all. I'm not a denialist. I'm "evidence-supremacist". Would be required by the Wikipedia exactly?Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 16:23, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Comfort women's question
If you say comfort women thought it was a slave, please answer the following questions. At the very least, please think.
 * 1. Why there is no PHYSICAL EVIDENCE ? At first, please submit the "PHYSICAL EVIDENCE" instead of "hearsay　/　testimony　/　novels".
 * The Japanese government's LATEST official response is "There was no evidence of forced by the military in the government data."(軍の強制連行の証拠ない　河野談話で政府答弁書, March 2007)


 * 2. Why is not there orphans Mixed Japanese and Korean?
 * Immediately after the United States occupied Japan, rape occur frequently in Japan, half-breed called "GI baby" was born more than 7,000. During the Vietnam War, the Korean military rape occurs frequently, half-breed called "Raitaihan" in Vietnam was born tens of thousands of people.
 * As a result, the Japanese government was forced to establish a comfort station for the U.S. military.
 * However, the problem does not exist half-breed between Japan and Korea. On the contrary, for the military comfort women was idol. Take over the debt of comfort women, many Japanese soldiers were married her.

If you do not put out the answer to these, but it's just racism. Please do not complicit in racial discrimination by Koreans. I do not think I want to fight with Wikipedia. I only cannot forgive Fut.Perf of denialist. Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 18:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Please note that you may not use your talk page to continue the dispute. If you try to do so, someone will probably remove your talk page access. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:47, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Dispute! Where is "dispute"? There is only "oppression". I tell you just in case, I've never denied the existence of comfort women. I was just denying "forced by the military." Do you still call me denialism? It is "rejection of the discussion". It's too ridiculous. Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 04:47, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you Qwyrxian, Phoenix7777 and more. I don't come here anymore.

But I'm impossible. I found the history that Japanese famous professional editing the "Comfort_women" 6 years ago. But even he had been called denialist and eliminate.

Does not make sense to come here anymore. Japan need to consider different approach. I'm sorry in poor English. But many Japanese is more poor. Therefore, I was forced to so. To write in English only this much, I have taken 30 minutes. I'm tired.

Someday, I hope to spread the Korean despicable forgery the world. See you.Wingwrong ★ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 05:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)