User talk:Winhunter/Archive-Dec07

Good for Moldova
Good that now is procted. Even Users/Admins started to edit war there. But nobody exlained their edits on discussion. --Mulţam'--Cezarika f. (talk) 14:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Winhunter, I am not sure what is your role here, but if you have any time please go through the edit history on the Moldova article, the talkpage and my own talkpage. Also, remember that Cezarika f. is less than 24h out of a block due to wars on the same page. Thank you.Nergaal (talk) 14:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * You are also.--Mulţam'--Cezarika f. (talk) 15:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed that block was overturned. Though please take the arguments off my talk page and into the article talk page please. Thanks. --WinHunter (talk) 15:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It appears so, please report it to 3RR noticeboard and it will be further processed there. I will let another admin to decide on that matter since I protected the page. For the page itself if the talk page shows consensus to a particular version I will be happy to action on it. --WinHunter (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 19th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:55, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

moldova
Sorry, I left out of my mind that it must be soft-protected against anon socks. Please keep in mind that the whole bunch of Moldova-related topics is plagued by sockpuppetting. While regular editors may war a bit, they are mostly reasonable. But there are a couple of banned users who pop up periodically and rekindle the mess. `'Míkka>t 19:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)


 * please take a few minutes to read through the latest developments in the talk page. anonimu is the user that refuses to accept cerfified references that have been agreed on the talk page. I believe it would be much more fair and neutral if you would protect the article in the version chosen by illythr (the one that has the support by the most users). Thanks for your time.Nergaal (talk) 15:30, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * ah, I forgot: you protected the page right after a major revert done by anonimu. my point is that right before his edit, there was some consensous among the people on the talkpage.Nergaal (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * in fact if you pay attention to the last statement I left on the talkpage i am saying "since I know that 10h from now, Anonimu will have reverted many more than 2 of my references, I decided (I agree, probably hastly) to just have a 'neat' version from which him to 'trim down'" and is signed 8 minutes after anonimu had made the change. assuming I needed more than 8 minutes to wirte down my statement on the talkpage, I was really right - he did delete more than 2 references by that big revert Nergaal (talk) 15:44, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I do not know who's right and who's wrong in this since I am not familiar with the subject. However from the edit history I do notice that there are many users involved in this edit dispute. Protection is not an endorsement of the current version. --WinHunter (talk) 15:59, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It is just an endorsement for 7 days(or however the block lasts). At the end of the block, the users will restart the dispute from the blocked version since it has lasted for 7 days (all the work before the ban would have been useless). Nergaal (talk) 21:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I am wondering.. anyone tried stuffs listed in WP:DISPUTE? --WinHunter (talk) 05:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Races_and_nations_of_Warhammer_Fantasy
I took the liberty of recreating this redirect as a redirect to Races and nations of Warhammer Fantasy. Taemyr (talk) 10:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine, thanks for the info. --WinHunter (talk) 11:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Deletion of Riktam Technologies
Dear Sir/Winhunter,

Dear Sir, It is good to see that my article about "Riktam Technologies" has been deleted by you as per CSD A7 (was an article about a company or corporation that didn't assert the importance or significance of its subject..) while I am providing my arguments justifying the presence of the article in wikipedia in the article's talk page, and kept a hangon on the article top. It is good to know that you have deleted the talk page too. It would be really great and excellent if you could guide me to the mistake/error I have committed.

Dear sir, I would like to bring to your notice the articles about Satyam and AppLabs and Riktam which are listed in teh same vien in the List "List of Companies in Hyderabad" I was putting up lot of arguments that elucidate the importance and significance of Riktam Technologies.

Dear Sir, I being new to Wikipedia, might have forgotten to put double braced hangon and might have put a single brace hangon. It would be kind if you could reply to this post......

Thanking you, Aditya2you

Aditya2you (talk) 11:16, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
 * From what you have written in the article there is no assert of notability and no reference to support the company is notable. --WinHunter (talk) 09:50, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

restore salubria
Please restore the "salubria" page. I was not promoting any particular company. I made a reference to one, but I will remove that reference if this is an issue. I have no affiliation with the referenced company.

Thanks,

Sandy —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmossol (talk • contribs) 06:15, 25 November 2007
 * Please kindly advise the notability of this subject as it was not asserted in the article. Thanks. --WinHunter (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk page of non-existing page
Please do not delete useful talk pages, WP:CSD says: "This excludes any talk page which is useful to the project."--Patrick (talk) 13:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

See Template:On nl.--Patrick (talk) 13:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I do not believe the talk pages I deleted with this reason are useful. For those tagged with, I believe a better way to do it is create a list on a wikiproject instead of create a talk page with this template. --WinHunter (talk) 13:21, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * As I have now clarified on the doc page, on the non-existing page the color of the link to the talk page shows the latter's existence, which leads through that page to the info one is looking for.--Patrick (talk) 13:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I followed the suggestion on Template talk:On nl from another user, and there were no objections.--Patrick (talk) 13:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Do you think it would be better if you list those articles in WikiProject Germany and ask the participants there to create the article? --WinHunter (talk) 14:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I suppose this refers to a possible similar Template:On de. It is not a choice of one or the other, both can be done, and "What links here" applied to the template gives a useful list of wanted pages.--Patrick (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
 * My apologies, I actually want to meant WikiProject_Netherlands. If this template is endorsed by the wikiproject then I have no further objections. --WinHunter (talk) 23:27, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:52, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Need some advice
How can I report problem IP addresses or address blocks? One article on my Watchlist, Raiden Fighters 2, gets edited by a person in an IP address block resolving to AT&T Internet services in Monterey Park, California, USA. All edits by this anonymous user continue to add the same deliberately incorrect information, every time without any citations. The time interval between edits by this user range from four to 14 days. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. JudgeSpear (talk) 03:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:RFPP to get the page protected and WP:AIV for reporting vandalism. --WinHunter (talk) 04:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * I have not tried AIV, but their guidelines state that the user needs to have been warned beforehand, before I can pose a report. Unfortunately, this user has not been warned. Additionally, this user has a dynamic IP, so there are many possible talk pages for this user. I tried to leave a message on a talk page for that user, but to no avail. I already tried RFPP twice, and both times, my request has been declined because there is not enough recent disruptive activity to warrant a protection. They don't consider edits over the span of eight or so days disruptive enough. It becomes very annoying to continually revert this user's meaningless edits of intentionally misleading information. JudgeSpear (talk) 06:51, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Asking a question
My friend's article, Colorado Conservatory for the Jazz Arts, was deleted, and I'm wondering what happened. I mean, I don't really care about the article, and I don't care whether it comes back, but would it be possible for me to find out what the article looked like prior? Thanks!--Heero Kirashami 02:33, 2 December 2007 (UTC) (Oh, and if you can, post your response on my talk page, User_talk:Heero_Kirashami; it has that little "new messages" infobox, so I'll know when I get the response.)

Signpost updated for December 3rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 10:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

usernames
Hi, sorry to bother but I noticed you were checking newcomers' usernames. I don't know which the policy exactly is, and whether the case is relevant or not, but about this username, in Italian language "pippa" means male masturbation. I notice that his first contribution (now deleted) had the word in the title too. If bad words in languages other than English are unwelcome too, I could make other checks for Italian ones, if useful --g (talk) 15:21, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi there, I am really not sure about this one since I don't know Italian, please list it in Usernames for administrator attention for another administrator's review. Thanks. --WinHunter (talk) 19:08, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Bad speedy deletion
You speedy deleted the article Trick My Trucker, stating "Speedy deleted per (CSD A1), was a very short article providing little or no context." This is clearly not accurate as the initial article stated that Trick My Trucker was "a Reality TV Show on CMT" along with a further description. CSD A1 is for "very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article". I could theoretically imagine the article being speedied under CSD A7 (although it would be a stretch), but A1 was clearly not appropriate in this case. Kaldari (talk) 23:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes.. The original version should have been deleted as CSD A7 because there was no assert of notability. --WinHunter (talk) 01:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 10th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Regarding Furse (Family and Surname)
Please use the "move" function instead of doing a cut-and-paste move in the future. Thanks. --WinHunter (talk) 14:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Will do -- thanks for letting me know.

Showjumpersam (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)