User talk:Winhunter/Archive-Jan07

User:IdontlikeDanDRic
I believe this user may be from IP 129.96.234.230 as as soon as that IP was blocked after I reverted some edits, he vandalized my user page, then vandalized one of the same pages as the IP address had, then embarked on a 22 minute spree of random vandalism. Dan D. Ric 03:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 18th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:ANI
I have replied to you. &mdash; Nearly Headless Nick  {C} {L} 07:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Chadbryant Sockpuppet
Here is another Chadbryant sockpuppet USER:Wile E. Bowels DXRAW 22:23, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Bot
A page-move regexp was a bit too general. Should be fixed now.  Voice -of- All  16:53, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

RHB(AWB)
I've signed in the userpage confirming it is me. RHB 16:12, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

IIPM
I've left a message for you on the request for unprotecting the IIPM article page. Regards, Mrinal Mrinal Pandey 12:33, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

My Request for Adminship
 

Thanks for your support on my successful Request for Adminship  (final result 78 Support /0 Oppose / 1 Neutral) I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. I will be slowly acclimating myself to my new tools over the next months. I am humbled by your kind support and would certainly welcome any feedback on my actions. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Once again, many thanks and happy new year! All the best, Asterion talk 16:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Non-commercial CC images
In fact, all those images are clearly under non-commercial licences if you look at the original pages from which they were taken; the uploader mistagged them. Please take some care before mass reverting good-faith edits which are in fact correct: Thanks. cab 07:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) http://www.flickr.com/photo_zoom.gne?id=147417058&size=l
 * 2) http://flickr.com/photos/uninspired-clicks/158748171/
 * 3) http://www.flickr.com/photos/52227042@N00/91794536/
 * 4) http://www.flickr.com/photos/willywhopper/161861659/
 * 5) http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickyates/115752906/
 * 6) http://www.flickr.com/photos/34616027@N00/173687565/
 * 7) http://www.flickr.com/photos/mickyates/115752880/in/set-72057594087112576/

Bad IP
Hi, I'm writing you to inform that I've blocked 71.234.9.178 also on meta. Please note that your own block on en.wikipedia is set to expire on next Jan 16th. Ciao, M/ 18:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

User:Fattdoggy's block
You recently blocked User:Fattdoggy indefinitely. I had a look through his edit history, and it seems pretty benign, mainly sticking to his own userpage or adding templates to blocked users. He has also made the [occasional useful edit]. As far as I can tell, his block has been mostly for his experimentation with the DEFCON template. I feel that an indefinite block is too harsh, and that with WP:ADOPT or similar guidance, User:Fattdoggy could become a useful member of the community.

Oh, I'm not a sock before you ask (Special:Contributions/LukeSurl)

--00:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

User Fattdoggy
I believe that User Fattdoggy had made edits in good faith. I request that you remove the indef block to a more reasonable block. This being said, if there are edits that I am unaware of, other than the edits to Wdefcon, please let me know and I may be in support of this block. I have been trying to help this editor out. I may be wrong about good faith edits, however, I feel that I have the right to assume it! Thanks again for any comment on this situation. Even if you choose not to unblock this editor, I would much appreciated why an indef block is appropriate? Thanks again! -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 05:35, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

I believe this edit to rock music was him trying to add emo to the list of musical genres (we should Assume good faith no?). It also seems harsh to block somebody for trying to talk to Jimbo, however silly his suggestion. From what I see, this is a naïve but ambitious user, who just needs some guidance to point him in the right direction. LukeSurl 12:40, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for January 8th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

A very Californian RfA thanks from Luna Santin

 * This has been long overdue, I'm afraid. See you on the wiki. :) Luna Santin 12:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Request for Wii unblock
About a week ago you locked the Wii page after I made a that request cause of edit wars, well now the edit war has cooled down and the block is no longer nessesary, I figure since you were the one that blocked the page it only seems right that you unlock it. --Dctcool 00:09 17 October 2006 (UTC)

American Legion Baseball in Wisconsin 2000 Champions
Why did you delete this article?

User:Tudur
I was horrified to see that you had blocked Tudur from editing, what did he ever do to you, how would you like it if he blocked you. He is a personal friend of mine and has informed me of his deep concern towards your negative attitude. Thanks for reading Oogieboogie

Signpost updated for January 15th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

protection
Thanks for adding the protection template to Template:Rating. i forgot about that. David D. (Talk) 15:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 17th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

smelly socks
to block the rest of his/her sockpuppets see: Suspected sock puppets/85.178.128.251.-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 07:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

speedy delete notice
huh? I'm not really sure what the point in that would be. -- Ned Scott 06:09, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No harm of leaving it there a couple more days. --WinHunter (talk) 10:58, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

My apologies for licensing the images found on Orca (Supercar), I'll be sure to not do that again. 125.63.139.146 (talk) 01:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 26th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)